andrade Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

psychology being investigated

A
  1. memory
  2. attention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

background

A

Doodling may impair performance by taking concentration away from the
primary task.

But, doodling can improve concentration:
– on uninteresting tasks
– increases arousal and alertness and reducing daydreaming, which
decreases concentration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

aims

A
  1. To investigate whether doodling while listening improves attention/
    concentration.
  2. To investigate whether doodling while listening improves recall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

research method

A

laboratory experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

research design

A

independent measures
design (and random allocation).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

data collection techniques

A
  • Monitoring task: Participants listened to a pretend telephone message about a
    party, including names of people and places
    – They had to write down the names of people who attending the party (monitored information).
  • A surprise memory test.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

independent variable

A

whether the participants were allowed to doodle or not while listening to the pretend telephone message.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

dependent variables

A
  1. Monitoring
    – accuracy: number of correct names (out of 8)
    – performance: correct names minus false alarms
  2. Memory for:
    – monitored information: number of correct names recalled (out of 8) after
    false alarms were deducted
    – incidental information: number of correct places recalled (out of eight)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

sample

A

Size: 40 (35 women and 5 men); doodling condition: 20; control condition: 20.

Demographic: 18–55-year-olds; members of the University of Plymouth participant
panel.

Sampling technique: opportunity; participants had just finished another experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure

A
  1. Participants sat alone in a quiet, dull room and were given a sheet a A4 paper.
    Either:
    – printed with rows of shapes to shade (the exp. group).
    – lined with no shapes (the control group).
  2. They were asked to listen to a 2.5-minute audio recording of a pretend telephone message
  3. The message mentioned:
    – 8 people who would be at the party
    – 3 people and a cat who could not come (lures)
    – 8 place names
    – a lot of irrelevant information.
  4. Both groups had to write down the names of the people coming to the party on the paper.
  5. One minute after listening to the tape, there was a surprise memory test.
    Participants had to write down:
    – names of the party-goers
    – place names
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

controls

A
  1. heard the same 2.5-minute tape in the same room
  2. were given standardised instructions before listening to the tape
  3. counterbalancing: Half the participants recalled the names first and the other half recalled
    places first (avoid order effects)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ethical issues

A
  1. Deception: Participants were told that they did not need to remember anything on the tape
  2. Informed consent could not be given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

results

A
  1. (monitorin accuracy
    -mean names correctly written down: doodlers: 7.8, control: 7.1
    -monitoring performance score: doodlers: 7.7, control: 6.9
  2. recall performance
    -total recall for doodlers was 29 % higher than control
    -doodlers remembered both types of information better than the control group.
    -both groups remembered monitored information better than incidental
    information.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

conclusion

A
  1. Doodling improves concentration during boring listening tasks.
  2. Doodling improves memory, even for information we have not intentionally tried
    to store.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

evaluation

A
  1. Reliability (S)
  2. Validity
    -experimental method and design (S)
    -operational definitions (W)
    -confounding variables (S)
    -use of lures (S)
  3. Objectivity (W)
  4. Generalisability
    -generalising beyond the sample (W)
    -generalising to everyday life (W)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

issues and debates

A
  1. Individual and situational explanations:
    -attention/memory is affected by situational factors eg. doodling
    -cognitive performance is not always fixed
    -that parents/teachers/employers need to be aware that small changes in a
    situation can improve performance.
  2. Application to everyday life
    -Benefits of doodling should be communicated to employers/teachers, etc.
    -It should not be assumed that people who doodle in classes/meetings are not
    concentrating.
    -People who find it hard to concentrate could be offered paper to doodle