ac1.1: describe processes used for law making Flashcards
government processes
the majority of laws made in england and wales are made in parliament in a process of consultation, debates and voting. for a new law to be created it must go through certain stages
stage 1
green paper
sets out ideas for the new law, it’s just a proposal here
stage 2
white paper
the formal proposal, its known as a bill and is presented in parliament
stage 3
first reading
the name and aims of the bill are read out in parliament, a vote is taken to see what mp’s think
stage 4
second reading
there is a debate on the features of the bill, another vote is taken
stage 5
committee stage
a chosen group of representatives look closely at the bill. they’ll address any issues and suggest appropriate ammendments
stage 6
report stage
the committee reports back to parliament, mp’s then vote on the amendments made
stage 7
third reading
after the bill has been debated and amended the mp’s have one final vote
stage 8
house of commons/lords
stages 3 to 7 are repeated in the other house
stage 9
royal assent
the monarch signs the bill, this however is only symbolic and they cannot refuse. the bill is now an act of parliament and becomes a law
judicial processes
when a judge makes the law instead of parliament. there are 2 ways this can happen: judicial precedent and statutory interpretation
judicial precedent
- a law made by judges in the courts, when a judge makes a decision in a case it becomes a law and then must be followed in the future in similar cases
- this is done to ensure the law is applied consistently
- lower courts must abide by decisions made in higher courts
donoghue v stevenson (1932)
- 2 friends went to a cafe and 1 drank a bottle of ginger beer that had a decomposing snail in it
- she fell ill and sued the manufacturer
- the court decided that the manufacturer owed a duty of care (neighbour principle), which founded the modern day law of negligence
daniels v white (1938)
- the claimant bought a bottle of lemonade that had corrosive metal in it
- the case of donoghue v stevenson was used when suing for compensation
- even though the cases were different, it was ruled as sufficiently similar for the purpose of a precedent
statutory interpretation
- judges in the superior courts like the court of appeal and the supreme court are called upon to interpret words and phrases within a stature
- there are certain rules that can be used to make the interpretation