(Abby) research methods(CP2) Flashcards
what are co-variables
- the 2 variables in correlational study’s which have been measured
what is correlational analysis
- describes the relationship between two co-variables in statistical terms
describe a positive correlation
- where high values on one variable are associated with high values of the other variable or low visa versa
describe a negative correlation
- high variables on one variable is associated with low variables of another variable
define a scatter diagram
- a visual representation of (a graph of) a correlational relationship
how is the strength of a scatter diagram determined
- the straightness of the line of dots
how is the direction of a scatter gram determined
- the slope of the line of the dots
what is a correlation co-efficient
- any number between +1 and -1
- informs us of the strength and direction
what numbers are weak, moderate and strong correlations
weak- 0.0- 0.3
moderate- 0.3- 0.7
strong- 0.7 +
what are perfect correlation coefficients
+1 and -1
what are some strengths of correlational research
- allows the identification of relationships between variables when it is difficult for practical reasons or unethical
- if a relationship between 2 variables is indicated, this can be a starting point for stimulating future research
- it is scientific meaning it tends to be objective and easily replicable using quantitative data
what are some weaknesses of correlational research
- because there is little control over variables it does not allow cause and effect links to be established
- there may be a 3rd unknown variable
- the 2 co variables may not be measured in a valid manner
- correlations can be misused -> huge claims can come from just a relationship
what is the difference between a research method and a data collection technique
- research method doesn’t have an IV and a data collection technique does
define observational research
- focuses on the observation of a persons freely chosen behaviour
what are the 2 types and observational research and define them
- naturalistic -> spontaneously occurring behaviour is studied in its natural setting and the environment has no manipulation from the experimenter
- structured -> some of the variables including the environment are controlled, can be in a lab setting, still aim to capture freely chosen behaviour but the situations may be set up
what are the positives of naturalistic observation
- observers remain covert so behaviour is normal meaning ecological validity is high as results are more generalisable
- gathers all data that would happen in a real life situation so validity is high as data gathered is very rich
- useful for the study of behaviour in situations where ethical considerations prevent manipulation
what are the negatives of naturalistic observation
- remaining hidden can be an issue for researchers, participants may become aware and alter there behaviour, threatening validity
- many extraneous variables meaning replication can be more difficult and lower reliability
- cannot establish cause and effect links
- ethical considerations concerning deception, consent and invasion of privacy and right to withdraw
what are the advantages of structured observations
- allows for more control over the environment which means easier replication and therefore higher reliability
what are the disadvantages of structured observations
- lacks ecological validity as behaviour can be artificial if the participant becomes aware they are in a study
- cannot get a causality between the IV and DV
define participant observations
- observer becoming part of the group being studied with or without their knowledge
what are the positives of participant observations
- potential for more meaningful observations as the observers will have a better understanding, data gathered will be more rich and detailed than any of method
- high ecological validity is likely as people should continue about their business in an everday manner
what are the disadvantages of participant observation
- researcher may get to involved and become less objective, affecting the validity
- lots of ethical issues raised such as deception
what are non-participant observations
- observers that are not part of what is being observed, they may sit apart or may observe via video link or a one way mirror
what are the advantages of non-participant observations
- accuracy of the data is likely to be very high, increases validity
- objectivity will be a lot higher
what are the disadvantages of non-participant observation
- observer may have little understanding of what is happening, lowering validity
- ethical issues raised such as invasion of privacy
what are overt observations
- participants are aware they are bring observed and know all aspects of the study- so fully informed consent has been given