9. Qualitative Methods Flashcards

1
Q

Qualitative data

A

Data without numerical properties, typically classification or categorization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The anti-naturalist view (of social science)

A

Since the methods of social and natural science differ in so many ways, the social sciences cannot and should not follow the methodology of natural science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The naturalist view (of social science)

A

Since social since shares the goals of natural science, the social sciences can and should follow the methodology of natural sciences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Simulation theory of interpretation

A

We reuse our own cognitive mechanisms to simulate other people’s mental states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Theory theory of interpretation

A

We construct a theory of mind just like a scientific theory, using collective evidence and revising hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Belief-desire explanation

A

An agent’s action A (instead of B) is explained by her desiring some result X (and not Y), and her believing that A will bring about X (and that B will bring about Y)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The intentional stance

A

Attributing mental states like beliefs and desires to an agent A (a human, an animal or even a machine), assuming A to be rational, and using this to predict the actions of A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mixed method (of data types)

A

Using qualitative data both in its own right and as raw material for generating quantitative data of one or several properties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case study

A

A study characterized by using a small number of cases that are chosen for some specific reason and display the same outcome.
The study typically does not involve experimental manipulations.
The goal of the study is to understand a specific case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Multivariate study

A

A study using a large number of cases, chosen from population randomly or in other ways representatively.
The values of the dependent variable vary across observation points.
The study involves or tries to mimic experimental manipulation.
The goal of the study is to identify and understand general patterns characterizing a population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Analytical narrative

A

A kind of case study where a narrative is presented to clarify the important actors and main decision points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Qualitative comparative analysis

A

Analysis of cases performed in order to learn about necessary causes and thus better understand the boundaries of the underlying population.
The results can be applied in a multivariate analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Process tracing

A

A kind of case study that emphasises cause-effect relations in a single case vs. Cause-effect relations as mean effect size in the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The methodological individualism principle

A

Allgood social theory is reducible to individualist accounts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ontological holism

A

Social norms are things that exist, but they don’t exist on the individual level.
Instead, they are social entities, irreducible to individual qualities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Methodological holism

A

Claims, in contrast to ontological holism, that social norms can be reduced to individual qualities, but only on a case-by-case basis.
Social scientists aim at describing in general the relation between social norms and human behaviour.
A case-by-case relationship only gives us specific historical narratives, and we do not want to trade explanatory generality for methodological individualism