9. Development of Self and Peer Relationships Flashcards
The Self- Concept
- An organized set of beliefs about oneself, including personality traits, physical characteristics, abilities, values, and roles
- Rudimentary self-concept emerges around 18 months as evidenced by children passing rouge test
–> Children also start using “me” pronoun and calling themselves by name around this age
Gender and the Self-Concept
- Gender is usually first characteristic present in children’s self-concept and is central to their sense of self
- 2.5 – 3 years old: form basic gender identity
–> Start identifying as boy or girl and can label others as boys or girls
Gender Socialization
- Process through which children learn about the social expectations, attitudes, and behaviours associated with girls and boys by internalizing the messages received about gender from caregivers and wider society
- Parents of day-old infants describe newborn girls as softer, less strong, more delicate, and quieter than newborn boy
Baby X Studies
- Studies in which researchers label the sameinfant as a “boy” or a “girl” and then observe how adults interact with the infant
- Infants labelled as “boys” rated as bigger, stronger, louder and more likely to be encouraged to be active
- Infants labelled as “girls” received more talk and nurturance
- Suggests that caregivers’ perceptions of differences between male and female babies are due to their own associations with gender, rather than actual gender differences
More Subtle Gender Socialization
- Study: How does gender shape parents’ expectations about motor skills?
- Method:
–> Parents of 11-month-olds estimated the steepest slope their infants could safely crawl down without falling by setting the angle on a mechanical sloping walkway
–> Infants then tested on their actual crawling skills down slopes of different angles - Parents of girls tended to underestimate their infant’s crawling ability but parents of boys more accurately estimated their ability
- When tested on their actual skills, boys and girls did not differ on the slopes they could safely crawl down
- Suggests that gender differences in motor skills only exist in parent’s perception
More Subtle Gender Socialization Contd.
- Toy purchases
–> Boys have more toy trucks and girls have 5x more pink toys by 12-months-old - Play
–> Parents present boys with more physical challenges than girls
–> More likely to offer girls more help - Language differences
–> Parents are more likely to use emotion words with girls than boys in early childhood
–> Emotion understanding thus develops earlier in girls - Division of household chores
–> Homes in which parents take on more traditional gender roles in completing chores are communicating gender roles - Media exposure
–> More TV viewing by preschoolers associated with them more likely saying that people see “boys as better than girls”
Self-Socialization
- Once a child identifies with a gender, they actively seek out gender-related information and conform their behaviour to this info
–> Highlights children’s own role in their gender development - 3-5 year olds: rigid, gender-stereotyped behaviours
–> Preference for toys and clothes that are consistent with gender identity
–> Preference for same-gender playmates
–> Cross-cultural *Due to lack of gender constancy
*Understanding that gender remains the same regardless of superficial changes to appearance or behaviour - 6 years old: Rigid, gendered behaviour relaxes because gender constancy is achieved
–> Accept more non-gendered appearance and toy preferences in themselves and others - BUT as children get older, they acquire more complex ideas and expectations about gender that include traits, roles, abilities, etc.
–> Incorporate these into their self-concepts and adjust their behaviour accordingly
–> E.g., girls are quiet and well-behaved; boys are active and good at sports
Implications of Gender Identity
- Gender is a central characteristic that organizes children’s self-concepts
- Adherence to gender stereotypes can unnecessarily limit children’s development in educational aspirations, social development, and emotional expression
- Extent to which a child shows gender-consistent behaviour is associated with level of peer acceptance
–> Even though children increase their gender flexibility with age, they tend to reject peers who do not behave in typically gendered ways
–> Greater engagement with peers of same gender is powerful way that gender stereotypes and identities are reinforced
Towards Gender Neutrality
- When parents have more egalitarian views and behaviours, children tend to have less traditional gender-role attitudes
- Gender neutral parenting: conscious parenting practice to encourage children to explore and express themselves in a way that is not defined by traditional gender roles
–> Common in WEIRD countries
–> E.g., not enforcing gender-specific colours, avoiding gender-specific language, encouraging all activities
Gender Development in Cis vs. Transgender Children
- Sex: assigned at birth usually based on external genitalia
- Cisgender children: Children who identify with their assigned sex
- Transgender children: Children who don’t identity with their assigned sex
–> Tend to show strong identification and preferences aligned with current gender in a way that is very similar to cisgender children
–> Research suggest that transgender identity is not a result of parent socialization and instead seems to be internally driven
Self-Concept is a Social Construction
- Children’s self-concept develops primarily by internalizing others’ perceptions of them
–> Direct: others describe a child a certain way and the child incorporates that description into their self-concept
*E.g., being told they’re good at math
–> Indirect: how children are treated
*E.g. caregiving experiences shape internal working models
Self-Concept in Early Childhood
- 3-6 years old*Gender is central to self-concept
- Concrete, observable characteristics that tend to focus on physical attributes and physical activities
- Unrealistically positive and confident
–> Result of cognitive limitations
Self-Concept in Middle Childhood
- 7-12 years old
- Describe self using personality traits and inner qualities
–> E.g. “I’m shy” - Self-concept is more balanced and accurate
–> Includes weakness but still positive overall - Changes in self-concept from early childhood due to:
–> Increased cognitive ability to think about multiple qualities simultaneously
–> Greater engagement in social comparison and more strongly influenced by the opinions of others
Self-Concept in Adolescence
- 13-18 years old
- Can think of themselves in increasingly abstract ways
–> “I’m extroverted, because I’m talkative, friendly, and energetic.” - But also…
–> More intense concerns about social acceptance which heavily influence self-concept
–> Egocentrism:
*Especially in early-mid adolescence
*Assume that their thoughts and feelings are more unique than they really are
*“You don’t understand me!”
*Imaginary audience: belief that everyone is very focused on their appearance and behaviour
–> Aware of differences in behaviour in different social settings leading to confusion and many questions about identity
Forming an Identity
- Forming an identity is the primary psychosocial task of adolescence/ early adulthood
- Identity is formed through a process of:
–> Exploration: questioning of parental and societal values and experimenting with various facets of identity
*Including appearance, hobbies, traits, friends, courses, etc.
*Viewed as important and healthy for identity development
–> Commitment: consolidation and acceptance of who one is as indicated by the choices one makes
Marcia’s Identity Statuses
- Typical trajectory: Diffusion –> Moratorium/Foreclosure –> Achievement
Identity Diffusion
- Lack of exploration of options and no commitments made
–> Due to lack of interest in own identity or indecision
–> Common in children
–> If persists into late adolescence/adulthood, associated with feeling disconnected, being easily influenced by others, and little sense of purpose
Moratorium
- Active exploration of various roles but no commitments yet
–> Brought about by awareness of multiple selves and exposure to different identity options
–> Feelings of confusion and anxiety are normal at this status
–> Important phase for identity achievement
Foreclosure
- Commitment to a life path without having explored alternatives
–> Due to:
*Parents making decisions for teen without their input
*Teen strongly identifies with a parent and wishes to follow in their footsteps
–> More likely in teens who are obedient, have a low level of tolerance for uncertainty, and have authoritarian parents
–> Potential problem is choosing an identity that is not a good fit
*Can lead to lower life satisfaction and a struggle to maintain the commitment - Most teens are in moratorium or foreclosure
Identity Achievement
- Completed phase of exploration and commitment to an internally driven identity
–> Associated with most positive mental health and social outcomes
–> Usually achieved in early adulthood
–> Biggest gains in identity are in post-secondary schooling due to greater exposure to different lifestyles, beliefs, and career options
Criticisms of Marcia’s Identity Status Theory
- Research into identity statuses conducted in WEIRD samples
–> Typical progression and outcomes may differ in non-WEIRD societies - Identity development is a continuous process, not limited to adolescence
–> Life events in adulthood can restart the process
–> E.g., losing a job
What is play?
- Voluntary activities done for inherent enjoyment
- Play looks different depending on a child’s age
Non-Social Play
- Play that doesn’t involve the participation of peers
1. Unoccupied play: child briefly watches things around them, but nothing holds their attention for long- Birth –3 months
2. Solitary play: child is focused on their own activity and is uninterested in playing with others - 3 months –2 years old
3. Onlooker play:child watches other children’s play - May ask questions, but won’t join in
- Begins around 2 years old
- Birth –3 months
Social Play
- Play that involves participation of peers
- Parallel play: children play next to each other, possibly doing the same activity, but do not interact much
–> Begins between in 2-3 years olds - Associative play: children play together, engaging sometimes, but have different goals
–> Begins between 3-4 years olds - Cooperative play: children play together and are working towards a common goal
–> Begins 4+ years old - Progression onto more advanced forms of play doesn’t mean that children no longer engage in less advanced form of play
Play is Critical for Learning
- Social-emotional development
–> Learn to cooperate
–> Develop theory of mind - Cognitive development
–> Practice problem-solving
–> Learning about the world through trial and error
–> Develop language skills - Motor development
–> Unoccupied play fosters motor skills
Importance of Play
UN recognizes a child’s right “to engage in play and recreational activities appropriate to the age of the child”
Friend
A person that’s not a relative with whom an individual has an intimate, reciprocated, and positive relationship
Children’s Choice of Friends
- Most important factors in children’s friendships:
1. Similarity- Age
- Acceptance by peers
- Personality (e.g. cooperativeness, shyness)
- Level of negative emotions
- Academic motivation
2. Proximity - More likely to become friends with kids who are physically near by
- Especially important for younger kids
Gender and Choice of Friends
- More likely to be friends with kids of the same gender
–> This preference emerges around 3 years of age
–> Peaks around age 13 - Age 13: Time with different gender friends increases, especially for girls
Ethnicity and Friendship
- To a lesser extent, children tend to be friends with peers of their own racial/ethnic group
- Children who enjoy meeting kids from different ethnicities tend to be more popular, have more friends, and seem to be more socially skilled in general
–> Associated with more positive attitudes towards other ethnic groups in the future
Developmental Trajectory of Friendships
- 1-2 years old:
–> Show preference of some children over others
*Touch them more often
*Smile more at them - 2-3 years old:
–> Developing more complex social behaviours
*E.g., imitating peers’ behaviours, cooperative problem solving, turn taking
*Emergence of parallel play - 3-5 years old: Kids have a concept of friendship
–> Most kids have at least one friend
–> Friendship defined as playing together
*Best friend = peer a child plays with most
–> But friends also have more conflict than non-friends
*More likely to cooperate to resolve conflict than non-friends
–> Emergence of preference for same gender peers (3-4 years of age) - 6-8 years old: Define friendship on basis of shared activities with peers
–> E.g. “He’s my friend because we both like to play soccer.” - 9 years old-12 years old: Definition of friendship expands to include trust, care, and help
- Adolescence: Friendship primarily defined by self-disclosure and intimacy
–> Friendship takes on central importance
–> Age 13: start having more friends of different genders
Girls’ vs. Boys’ Friendships
- As children get older, gender differences emerge in what they want out of friendship
- Girls (vs. boys):
–> Desire more closeness and dependency in friendships
–> But comes with more worrying and stress about friendships - Girls and boys show similar levels of conflict and stability in friendships
Sociometric Status
- Sociometric status: degree to which children are liked vs. disliked by peers
–> Measured by having children anonymously nominate peers in their class that they like (positive nominations) and peers in their class that they dislike (negative nominations) - Each child is classified into one of 5 status groups:
–> Popular
–> Rejected
–> Average
–> Neglected
–> Controversial
Popular Kids
- 11% of kids
- Liked by many peers and disliked by few
- Tend to be:
–> Socially skilled
–> Good emotion-regulation skills
–> Assertive, but not aggressive
–> Tend to have factors that give them high status
*Attractive, athletic, have popular friends
Rejected Kids
- 13% of kids
- Liked by few peers and disliked by many
- Tend to have fewer positive social skills compared to peers
Rejected-Aggressive
- 40-50% of rejected kids
- Tend to show high levels of hostility, threatening behaviour, physical aggression, and delinquency
- Vicious cycle: Aggressive <2–> Rejected
Rejected-Withdrawn
- 10-25% of rejected kids
- Tend to be socially withdrawn, timid, and socially anxious
- Frequently victimized and feel lonely, isolated, depressed
Vicious cycle: Withdrawn <–> Rejected
Controversial Kids
- 7% of kids*Liked by many but also disliked by many
- Characteristics of rejected-aggressive and popular kids
–> Aggressive, disruptive, and prone to anger
–> Compensate for this with many positive social skills like being cooperative, sociable, and funny
Neglected Kids
- 9% of kids
- Don’t receive many nominations
–> Not liked or dislike
–> Neutral/ not noticed - Less social and less disruptive than average children
- But not at risk for negative outcomes
–> Simply prefer solitary activities
–> Can be socially skilled in more structured activities
Average Kids
- 60% of kids
- Moderate number of likes and dislikes
- More social than rejected and neglected kids, but not as social as popular and controversial kids
Stability of Sociometric Status
- Sociometric status more likely to change from year to year
- Average and rejected status most stable
–> Popular status tends to be stable within a given school year
Importance of Friendship
- Provides social validation and support
–> Especially important during transitions
–> Kids tend to rely more on friends than parents starting in adolescence
–> Chronic friendlessness is associated with increased loneliness and depression
–> Friendship buffers against negative experiences
Friends Buffer Against Negative Experiences
- Study: 10-11 year olds reported on their negative experiences over the course of 4 days
–> After each experience, indicated:
*Self-worth: how they felt about themselves
*Whether best friend was present or not
–> Measured salivary cortisol as an indicator of stress reaction - If best friend was not present, more negative experiences associated with increased cortisol and lower self-worth
- But not if best friend was present
Importance of Friendship
- Provides social validation and support
–> Especially important during transitions
–> Friendship is associated with less loneliness and depression
–> Kids tend to rely more on friends than parents around age 16
–> Friendship buffers against negative experiences - Fosters development of positive social skills
–> Builds cooperation, theory of mind, conflict resolution skills
–> Childhood friendships are “practice” for adult relationships
Longitudinal Benefits of Childhood
- Study: Friendship assessed at age 10 and then follow-up at age 22
–> At age 10, kids who had a best friend (vs. those that didn’t) were seen as:
*Less aggressive
*More popular/ well-liked
–> At age 22, those that had a best friend at age 10:
*Were more successful in university
*Had better family and social lives
*Had high self-esteem and less anxiety & depression - Shows that having a close friendship in childhood has both short-term and long-term benefits for social and psychological well-being
Implications of Being Rejected
- Rejected, especially aggressive-rejected, status in childhood is associated with a variety of negative outcomes :
–> More aggression
–> Delinquency in teens
–> Substance abuse
–> Continued unhealthy relationships into adolescence and adulthood
–> Low self-esteem
–> Less education and limited work success
–> Crime in adulthood
Falling in With the Wrong Crowd
- Deviancy training: negative peer pressure wherein peers model and reinforce aggression and deviance by making these behaviours seem acceptable
–> Kids that have aggressive/ delinquent friends are more likely to also become more aggressive and delinquent themselves
–> Can begin as early as age 5
–> Similar effect with alcohol and drug use
Choosing the Wrong Crowd
- But also selection effect:
–> Children choose peers that are similar to them
–> Implies that kids choose and contribute to “the wrong crowd” - Vicious cycle: Aggressive Kids <–> Aggressive Friends
Secure Attachment with Parents
- Secure attachment promotes social competence with peers
–> Secure internal working model means that kids expect interactions with peers to be rewarding thus fostering more social engagement
Parental Monitoring
- Monitoring: parents keeping track of their children’s activities, friends, and whereabouts
- Looks different depending on the age of the child
–> Young children -> parents actively decide on activities
–> Adolescence -> parents have general knowledge of friends, activities, and whereabouts but exert less control over activities - Important at all ages, especially during adolescence
–> Young children with parents who organize more extracurricular activities tend to be more socially skilled
–> Teens’ whose parents have high knowledge of their social lives are less likely to engage in substance abuse
Parental Emotional Coaching
- Parents teach kids how to effectively manage emotions to interact with peers and handle conflict
- Study: Parental coaching buffers the level of stress associated with problems in friendships for kids 7-9 years old
–> Suggests that relationships with parents may have stronger link to mental health than peer relationships
School Interventions
- School interventions aim to improve children’s peer relationships by enhancing their emotional development
- Example: Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS)
–> Aim to change how rejected children interact with peers
PATHS
- Kids ages 4-11
- Learn:
–> to identify emotional expressions
–> think about the causes and consequences of different ways of expressing emotions
–> strategies for self-regulation
PATHS Outcomes
- Children that participate in PATHS (vs. control) show:
–> Improved emotion understanding and regulation
–> Increased social problem-solving
–> Decreased externalizing behaviour (aggression, acting out)
–> Decreased depression
Social Media Use
- 4.8 hours: Average number of hours a day a US teen uses social media
Benefits of Social Media Use
- Staying connected with what’s going on in friends’ lives
- Space for self-expression
- Finding similar peers
–> Enables social support and a sense of belonging
–> Online social supports seems to be especially important for marginalized youth
Potential Harms of Social Media Use
- Correlational studies show that higher social media use by adolescents is associated with:
–> Higher anxiety
–> Higher loneliness
–> Higher depression
–> Lower self-esteem
–> Poor body-image
–> Poor sleep
–> Attention difficulties - Negative association more pronounced for girls (vs. boys) and more pronounced for younger teens (12-14 years old)
- Important limitation = Correlation does not equal causation
Causal Evidence for Social Media Harms
- Method: Longitudinal study over 2 years of adolescents 12-15 years old
–> Examined effect of social media use on mental health, adjusted for pre-existing mental health problems - Results: Adolescents who spend more than 3 hours per day on social media faced 2x the risk of mental health problems, especially internalizing problems
Why is high social media use problematic?
- Exposure to harmful content
–> Unrealistic beauty standards
*Social media induced body comparison is strongly associated with body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in teen girls
*Internal research concluded that Instagram is engineered towards greater social comparisons than other apps, like TikTok and Snapchat
–> Maladaptive behaviour
*E.g. exposure to self-harm or restrictive eating content normalizes it and promotes similar behaviours in users
–> Hate-based content - Disruptions to healthy behaviours
–> E.g. sleep and physical exercise
–> 1/3 of girls 11-15 years old feel “addicted” to social media
Social Media and the Teen Brain
- Adolescents are likely more prone high social media use due to developing limbic system
–> Heightened reward processing in limbic system in adolescents (vs. kids or adults) likely leads to heightened sensitive to the positive and negative effects of social media
Frequent Social Media Changes and the Teen Brain
- Method: Longitudinal study over 3 years in 12-13 year old
–> Reported on social media use
–> Completed a social reward task in an fMRI scanner each year - Results: Teens who engaged in more frequent social media use showed increased amygdala activation over time in response to social rewards
–> Compared to typical decrease in sensitivity - Suggests that frequent social media use may be associated with brain changes to social rewards and punishments
APA Recommendations
- Adult should monitor kids’ social media use, especially in early adolescence (10-14 years old)
–> Age-appropriate social media limits
–> Discussions with kids and coaching around social media use - Adults should model a healthy relationship with social media
- Kids should receive social media literacy training