8. Quality mgt Flashcards

1
Q

Effects of poor quality

A

Higher transformation costs (rework, scrap, etc.)
Higher warranty costs (returns, repairs, etc.
Loss of sales (short term)
Loss of reputation (long term)
Lawsuits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Quality Mgt Process

A

Alarm bell - investigate - prevent
Checksheets - Root Cause Analysis, Fishbone Diagrams - Process Failsafes Checklists
Pareto Analysis
Scatter Diagrams
Control Charts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

chart of quality cost

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can quality be improved

A

Quality can be improved if money can be moved out of “failure” costs and into “control” costs (no “new money” needed).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Control cost

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what control cost is a traditional view

A

increase appraisal= quality ^ cost ^
Deming view increase process quality= quality ^ cost v

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Prevention failsafes 5 measures from Honda clip

A

-Doors taken off at start of assembly process
-Plastic “film” placed on car exterior at start of assembly process
-Materials used in design of product
-Magnetic “Label” template for location / level
-Ring & watch guards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Failsafing

A

Creating a control condition where the
customer or employee can only take the correct action while performing the process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Checklists

A

Checklists are effective and efficient
 Formalize previous lessons learned
 Shares Best Practices
 Improvement is typically immediate and significant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Quality Mgt Philosophies

A

-Six Sigma
-PDCA Cycle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Six sigma

A

Goal: to reduce process variation (errors) to the point where only 3.4 defects per million are produced by a process that involves a
high volume of manufactured units or service transactions
- Framework to evaluate bus. processes and reduce waste

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happens where is high process variation

A

defects occurs regulary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DMAIC

A

Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Six Sigma Black belt certification allows

A

Lead process improvement project and team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PDCA Cycle

A

Developed by Walter Shewart (1891-1967)
Plan - the improvement (obj/specifics)
Do- implement the improv. plant
Check- Act results vs planned results
Act- adjust so actual meets planned results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Quality Certification

A

-ISO 9000
-ISO 14000
-ISO 26000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

ISO

A

International Organization for Standardization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

ISO 9000

A

-series of international generic mgt systems standard
-Purpose: to facilitate international trade by providing a single set of standards that everyone recognizes.
-They are process standard - quality view
-Requires thorough documentation of processes- can be expensive & time cons.

19
Q

ISO 14000

A

-Primarily concerned with environmental mgt regarding what the org. does to minimize harmful effects on env. and achieve continual improvement.
Advantages
-Positive public image and reduced exposure to liability
-Good systematic approach to pollution prevention through the
minimization of ecological impact of products and activities
-Compliance with regulatory requirements and opportunities for competitive advantage

20
Q

ISO 26000

A

-Guidance on social & environ. responsibilities
-Not a certification but a voluntary guidance to move org to good intention to good action
deals
1. Organizational Governance
2. Human Rights
3. Labour Practices
4. The Environment
5. Fair Operating Practices
6. Consumer Issues
7. Community Involvement and Development

21
Q

Which certification has over 500,000 org in 180 countries

A

ISO 14000 WHILE ISO 9000 has over 1.1 million organizations in over 170 countries worldwide

22
Q

Quality Control Graphical Tools

A

A. Pareto Analysis
B. Scatter Diagrams
C. Cause-and-Effect Diagrams (Fishbone)

23
Q

Florence Nightingale

A

Founder of nursing & pie charts

24
Q

Pareto Analysis

A

Distinguishes the vital few (80/20 rule)
Gather data on freq. of various events
Ranked in decreasing order of importance
Graph displays histogram(bar chart) of freq.
line graph of cumulative freq.

25
26
Scatter Diagrams
Plot data points and visually interpret the results
27
Root cause Analysis - Fish bone Diagram
AKA Cause-and-Effect Diagram and Ishikawa Diagram  Keep asking ‘why?’ to determine the root cause of a problem
28
Statistical Quality Control(SQC)
into acceptance sampling & statistical process control (SPC) Acceptance sampling -A form of appraisal -acceptance or rejection of goods which already exist  Process Control - A form of prevention -sets standards to indicate when adjustments should be made while the service or good is being produced.
29
Statistics & measures for quality control
Study of numerical data to better understand the characteristics of a population or process.  Measures of “Central Tendency”  Measures of “Dispersion” Central Limit Theorem
30
Measures of Central Tendency
Sample mean xbar = sum x/n m rep samples n rep observation , timres Grand mean Xdouble bar = sum of X bar / m
31
Measure of Dispersion
Sample Range = largest X - smallest X Sample sd = s= sqrt(x-x bar)^2/n-1
32
CLT
If we calculate sample means, x bar ’s, rather than just individual observations, then for large n the distribution of the xbar 's will tend to normality.
33
Sample Errors
Type 1 error Type 2 error
34
What error is type 1
Producer risk
35
Operations Strategy & Sampling Errors
Want to avoid Type 2 error - high quality making control tight = type 1 error avoid type 1 error - reduce costs making control loose= type 2 error
36
Control Charts
to make inferences about the state (in control versus out of control) of the process on the basis of one or more statistics of samples drawn from the on-going process
37
Diff in in a state of control vs out of control
In control Out of control The variations are only by random fluctuations (common causes) usual - The variation is not purely random - assignable (or special) causes for the variability are present
38
Out of control means production is bad
No, it merely indicates that the process is not behaving in the way it is expected, given what is known about the process.
39
uder SPC diff in attributes & variable
Attribute- data that counts - pchart Variables - data that measures - x chart (central tendency) & r(variability)
40
Additional reasons to stop & investgate
-Trends in either direction -Consecutive points near UCL /LCL -five consecutive points above /below central line -Erratic behavior
41
How Often to Sample? Depends on:
 Cost of sampling  Variability of process  Cost of quality faults (ex. pencils vs. pacemakers) -Where to Monitor (Control) in a Multistage Process:  Before “costly” stages in the process  At the end, to ensure customer satisfaction  At historically unreliable stages  Near beginning to isolate supplier problems  Why not monitor at almost every stage of the process? Too expensive, too slow
42
Process Capability
measures whether or not the output will routinely (i.e., when the process is in control) meet the design specifications
43
Specification limits
The upper (USL) and lower (LSL) specification limits are externally set and are not affected by improving the process or sampling.  Measured by the relationship of the variation of individual values of the process with the USL and LSL.  Each individual product must meet the specification