8 Enzyme kinetics Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Enzyme kinetics background

A

Many important chemical reactions in biological systems are made possible by enzymes that act as catalysts: they participate in the intermediate stages of the reaction, but are not themselves converted into product.
S substrate
P product

S →(k₀) P (slow reaction
S +E S →
(k₁) SE →(k₂) P + E
(k₋₁)

faster reaction
E Enzyme
SE substrate-enzyme complex
reversible with different rates
reaction forming the product is not reversible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

ENZYME KINETICS

ODEs
The hypothesis that the rate of reaction between two species is proportional to the product
of their population sizes is something we have already seen. In chemistry, it is known as the
“law of mass action

A

ds(t)/dt= −k₁e(t)s(t) + k₋₁c(t)
de(t)/dt = −k₁e(t)s(t) + (k₋₁ + k₂)c(t)
dc(t)/dt= k₁e(t)s(t) − (k₋₁ + k₂)c(t)
dp(t)dt= k₂c(t).

s(t) :concentration of substrate,
e(t) : concentration of enzyme,
c(t) : concentration of complexes
p(t):concentration of product.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Enzyme kinetics dimensions
ds(t)/dt= −k₁e(t)s(t) + k₋₁c(t)
de(t)/dt = −k₁e(t)s(t) + (k₋₁ + k₂)c(t)
dc(t)/dt= k₁e(t)s(t) − (k₋₁ + k₂)c(t)
dp(t)dt= k₂c(t).

A

time-dependent quantities are concentrations, measured in units such as per ml, so
[s] = [e] = [c] = [p] = L⁻³
[k₂]= [k₋₁ ]= T⁻¹
[k₁] = L³T ⁻¹

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Enzyme kinetics
Typical initial conditions

looking at how the values are related

A

s(0) > 0 and E₀= e(0) > 0
but c(0) = 0 and p(0) = 0.

Find p(t): not on RHS on any so obtained from c(t)
de(t)/dt + dc(t)/dt = 0
so e(t) +c(t) constant = e(0) E₀
THE ENZYME IS NOT DESTROYED BY REACTION only stored in complexes
so e(t)= E₀ -c(t) and we only need to consider ds/dt and dc(t)/dt using E₀ and subbing in using de/dt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Enzyme kinetics what eq do we consider now

A

enzyme not destroyed only stored
New eq to consider:
ds(t)/dt= −k₁E₀s(t) +( k₁s(t)+k₋₁)c(t)

dc(t)/dt= k₁E₀s(t) − (k₁S(t)+k₋₁ + k₂)c(t)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Enzyme Kinetics Michaelis and Menten

New eq to consider:
ds(t)/dt= −k₁E₀s(t) +( k₁s(t)+k₋₁)c(t)

dc(t)/dt= k₁E₀s(t) − (k₁S(t)+k₋₁ + k₂)c(t)

A

Approx method for solving these.
ASSUMPTION process of formation and breakup of complex SE is so fast compared to formation of the product that it can be considered to be in equilibrium dc/dt =0 assumed at any t

So
c(t) = E₀[s(t)]/[s(t)+Kₘ]

where Kₘ = (k₋₁+k₂)/k₁

using this
ds/dt = -k₂ E₀ (s/(s+Kₘ))
dp/dt =k₂ E₀ (s/(s+Kₘ))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Enzyme kinetics: Michaelis-Menten constant Kₘ

A

A concentration
[Kₘ]= L⁻³

concentration of substrate such that the rate of formation of product is (1/2)Vₘₐₓ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Enzyme kinetics
under Michaelis and Menten model assumptions
Vₘₐₓ

dp/dt

A

Let V =dp/dt rate of formation of product

k₂ E₀ is called Vₘₐₓ as its the max rate of formation of product found when susbtrate concentration is high:

We can write V= Vₘₐₓ [s/[s+Kₘ]]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Enzyme kinetics plots
S against V

Lineweaver-Burk

Hanes-woolf plot

A

S against V
starting at S=0 V=0 increases then rate of increase slows
reaches V= Vₘₐₓ/2 at S= Kₘ
and continues to increase

Lineweaver-Burk: displays experimental data on a plot of 1/s against 1/V
rearranged
(1/V) = [Kₘ/Vₘₐₓ] (1/s) + (1/Vₘₐₓ)

Hanes-woolf plot S against S/V
or rearrange
s/V= (s/Vₘₐₓ) + [Kₘ/Vₘₐₓ)

both linear plots starting at some positive value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Enzyme kinetics
new eq:
ds(t)/dt= −k₁E₀s(t) +( k₁s(t)+k₋₁)c(t)

dc(t)/dt= k₁E₀s(t) − (k₁S(t)+k₋₁ + k₂)c(t)

scaled variables
u(t)=s(t)/s(0)
v(t)=c(t)/E₀

𝜏=k_1 E₀t

A

u(0)=1
v(0)=0

du/𝜏=-u + (u +K-α)v
ε(dv/d𝜏) = u - (u+K)v

constants
α=k₂/(k₁s(0))
K=(k₋₁+k₂)/k₁s(0)
ε= E₀/s(0)

K-α = (k₋₁)/k₁s(0) >0

near 𝜏=0 approx u=1 and v=0
du/d𝜏<0 and dv/d𝜏>0

V reaches maximum when:
dv/d𝜏 =0 when v= u/(u+K)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Enzyme kinetics
new eq: STEADY STATES
du/𝜏=-u + (u +K-α)v
ε(dv/d𝜏) = u - (u+K)v

A

Using the jacobian
A(u,v) =
[-1+v u+K -α ]
[ (1-v)/ε -(u+K)/ε ]

(0,0)
trace = -1-(K/ε) <0
det =α/ ε >0
STABLE and as τ → ∞, both u and v approach 0
reaction happens unless both values 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

enzyme kinetics typical behaviour trajectories for scaled new model

A

u and v against 𝜏:
v starts at 0, increases and reaches peak then decreases to 0
u starts positive and decreases with increasing slope then reduced slope continues to decrease close to 0
above v always

Both decrease to 0 S runs out so complexes also and will give a particular amount of product and E

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ENZYME KINETICS
Steady-state analysis (MATH5566)
(0,0) IS STABLE
NOW determine how fast trajectories approach (0,0) and from what direction

A

Eigenvalues:
ελ² + (K + ε)λ + α = 0

2ελ = - (K + ε) ± (( (K + ε)² - 4αε) ^0.5
=- (K+ε) ± (K + ε)(1 - (4αε/(K + ε)²))^0.5

USING (1+x)^0.5 = 1 + 0.5x + O(x²)

two cases
(2/K)ελ = -2 +O(ε)
(2/K)ελ = -(2α/K²) ε+O(ε)

Thus
ελ₁=-K +O(ε) (<0)
λ₂= -α/K +O(ε) (<0)
( when ε is small …. O(ε) approx 0)
both eigenvalue negative and real
Can write the general solution of linearised ODEs eigenvectors (a_1, 1) and (a_2, 1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(u(τ)) =c₁(a₁)exp(λ₁τ)+c₂(a₂)exp(λ₂τ)
(v(τ)) (1) (1)
ENZYME KINETICS
small-ε and steady-state analyses

A

λ₁ and λ₂ seem to be negative
so exp(λ₁t) and exp(λ₂t) converge to 0
one exponential will dominate the dynamics: whichever is larger
As τ → ∞
exp(λ₁τ)→exp(-(k/ε)τ)

exp(λ₂τ) →exp(-(α/k)τ) will dominate as small ε
(in the lecture we subbed in constants to see this and to see E_0 is smaller than a function of the k’s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ENZYME KINETICS
small-ε and steady-state analyses
We can approx dynamics by

A

NOTE:
J. v₂ =λ₂v₂
we find a₂ = K + ελ₂

(u(τ)) =c₁(a₁)exp(λ₁τ)+c₂(a₂)exp(λ₂τ)
(v(τ)) (1) (1)

using instead as τ → ∞
(u(τ))
(v(τ))
≈ c₂(a₂)exp(-(α/k)τ)
(1)

Thus the small-ε and steady-state analyses consistent:
1) rate at which u and v approach 0 proportional to exp(-(α/k)τ)

2) the approach to (0,0) along v=u/K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ENZYME KINETICS
Steady-state analysis (MATH5566)
(0,0) IS STABLE
NOW determine how fast trajectories approach (0,0) and from what direction

A

Eigenvalues:
ελ² + (K + ε)λ + α = 0

2ελ = - (K + ε) ± (( (K + ε)² - 4αε) ^0.5
=- (K+ε) ± (K + ε)(1 - (4αε/(K + ε)²))^0.5

USING (1+x)^0.5 = 1 + 0.5x + O(x²)

two cases
(2/K)ελ = -2 +O(ε)
(2/K)ελ = -(2α/K²) ε+O(ε)

Thus
ελ₁=-K +O(ε) (<0)
λ₂= -α/K +O(ε) (<0)
( when ε is small …. O(ε) approx 0)
both eigenvalue negative and real
Can write the general solution of linearised ODEs eigenvectors (a_1, 1) and (a_2, 1)
(u(τ)) =c₁(a₁)exp(λ₁τ)+c₂(a₂)exp(λ₂τ)
(v(τ)) (1) (1)

17
Q

enzyme kinetics trajectories on u-v plane

A

v=u/(u+K) increases from 0,0
v=u/K tangent?