7. Social Mobility in the United States Flashcards

1
Q

social stratification

A

társadalmi rétegződés
(upper, middle, lower classes) society’s categorization of people into socioeconomic strata, based upon their occupation and income, wealth, social status or derived power (social or political). Social stratification refers to a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. In the United States, it is perfectly clear that some groups have greater status, power, and wealth than other groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the IRS?

A

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is the federal agency responsible for collecting taxes and administering the tax laws in the United States. It operates under the Department of the Treasury and is tasked with ensuring that taxpayers comply with the tax code, providing assistance to taxpayers, and overseeing various benefits programs.

The IRS was established in 1862 during the Civil War to collect income taxes to fund the war effort. Over the years, it has undergone numerous changes and reforms. Today, the IRS’s mission is to provide top-quality service to taxpayers, helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities while enforcing the law with integrity and fairness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Social Mobility

A

Social mobility refers to the ability of individuals, families, or groups to move within or between social strata in society. This process can signify shifts in social class, economic status, or general position within the social hierarchy. This “movement” is a complex interplay of individual actions and systemic structures that either promote or inhibit upward (or downward) shifts in class.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of Mobility

A
  • upward mobility
  • downward mobility
  • intragenerational mobility
  • intergenerational mobility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Upward Mobility:

A

Moving to a higher social class, typically through increased wealth, education, or occupation.
 Example: Think of someone who grows up in a working-class family, snags a scholarship, and becomes a high-paid lawyer. From rags to rich(ish), basically.
 Data: Pew Research shows that only 9% of kids born in the lowest income quintile make it to the top quintile as adults. So, yeah, upward mobility is kinda rare when inequality’s all around.
 Key Factor: Education is the game-changer. Studies show that 45% of people with a bachelor’s degree experience upward mobility, compared to just 18% of those with only a high school diploma. Sorry, no shortcuts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Downward Mobility

A

Falling to a lower social class due to job loss, economic downturns, or health issues.
 Example: Losing a cushy job due to layoffs or facing illness that stops you from working. Watch your social status drop faster than a stock market crash.
 Data: The 2008 financial crisis saw unemployment skyrocket to 10%, pushing many into downward mobility. And let’s be real, recovery for most of them? Slow and painful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Intragenerational Mobility

A

Social mobility occurring within a person’s lifetime, e.g., someone who grew up poor and becomes wealthy (yes, like a real-life version of a rags-to-riches narrative).
 Example: From minimum-wage jobs to CEO status after years of grind and grit. Some people really turn that hustle into gold.
 Data: Brookings found that 40% of kids born into poverty stay there, while 30% experience upward mobility within their own lifetime. Not impossible, but definitely not guaranteed.
 Case Study: Howard Schultz, former CEO of Starbucks, went from public housing to global business mogul. Proof that intragenerational mobility isn’t just for the movies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Intergenerational Mobility

A

Definition: Intergenerational mobility is how much a child’s social or economic status changes compared to their parents. It shows if kids are doing better or worse than their parents.
Example:
Upward Mobility: Kids born to working-class families moving to higher-income levels.
Downward Mobility: Kids doing worse than their parents, falling into a lower social class.
Key Data:
The U.S. has low intergenerational mobility. It’s harder for kids in the U.S. to surpass their parents’ income compared to countries like Denmark.
The Great Gatsby Curve shows that more income inequality = less mobility.
Study Highlight:
Kids born into the bottom 20% of income in the U.S. only have a 7.5% chance of reaching the top 20%.
So, breaking out of poverty? Not as easy as it sounds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Social Stratification

A

Social stratification refers to the hierarchical arrangement of individuals into social categories, often based on factors like wealth, income, occupation, education, and social status. In essence, it’s society’s way of keeping people in their “place”—an economic and social ladder that everyone is supposedly climbing, but some people are stuck at the bottom while others are at the top.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Great Gatsby Curve

A
  • Definition: A graph showing the relationship between income inequality and intergenerational economic mobility.
    Essentially, if the rich keep getting richer and the poor stay poor, it’s way harder for people to move up the social ladder.
  • Concept: High inequality → low mobility (harder for kids to move up the social ladder); low inequality → high mobility (easier for kids to rise above their parents’ status).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Income Inequality

A

Definition: The uneven distribution of wealth in society.
Example:
In a society with high income inequality, the wealthiest 1% have most of the money, while the rest of the population is left with less. Think about how some people have billion-dollar companies, while others are struggling to pay rent.
Why it matters:
High income inequality makes it harder for people to move up the social ladder. More inequality = less chance to climb out of poverty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Intergenerational Earnings Elasticity

A

Definition: A measure of how strongly a child’s earnings are linked to their parents’ earnings. Higher elasticity means less mobility.
Example:
High Elasticity: In a country where children’s income is very closely tied to their parents’ (like the U.S.), kids born to rich parents tend to stay rich, and kids born to poor parents stay poor.
Low Elasticity: In a country where children can break free from their parents’ income level (like Denmark), kids have a better chance of making more money than their parents.
Why it matters:
High elasticity means that economic status is mostly passed down, creating a cycle. Low elasticity means people can break that cycle and improve their lives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is the U.S. mobility?

A

Definition: The U.S. has a lot of wealth concentrated in the hands of a few people, while the rest of the population struggles.
Example:
Kids born into the lowest 20% of earners in the U.S. have only a 7.5% chance of making it into the top 20%. Yeah, those odds suck.
High income inequality = less opportunity to rise above your parents’ economic status.
Intergenerational Elasticity: Children’s earnings are strongly tied to their parents’ earnings, so kids of rich parents (like billionaires Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos) have a better chance of staying wealthy.
Why it matters:
The U.S. is like a class elevator that’s stuck on the ground floor for most people, especially if you’re born into poverty. The rich are basically building their own towers to keep getting richer, while everyone else is stuck in the basement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

why does Scandinavia have better social mobility?

A

Policies like free education, universal healthcare, and strong social safety nets help kids move beyond their parents’ economic status.
Lower income inequality.
High social mobility with support systems like free education, paid parental leave, and healthcare.
Strong focus on equality of opportunity for everyone.
There’s a better shot at upward mobility because the system is designed to give everyone an equal starting point.
Why it matters:
Kids born in Scandinavia have a much higher chance of rising above their parents’ income level. The system is set up to break the cycle of poverty and promote opportunities for everyone, not just the lucky few.
Think of it as a functional elevator that doesn’t stop at the basement. Everyone can rise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why the Curve (gap) Exists

A
  1. Education Barriers: Quality education is expensive, and the rich can afford it, perpetuating inequality.
  2. Social Networks: Wealthy families have access to powerful social connections that help their children secure jobs, internships, etc.
  3. Access to Resources: Wealthier families have easier access to healthcare, housing, and opportunities, which solidifies their economic status.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Connection to the American Dream

A
  • The American Dream promises anyone can succeed through hard work, but the Gatsby Curve shows that inequality makes upward mobility nearly impossible for the poor.
  • The U.S. has one of the lowest intergenerational mobility rates among wealthy countries, while countries with less inequality (e.g., Scandinavian countries) show higher mobility
17
Q

What is Mobility?

A

Mobility refers to changes in economic status, wealth, income, or occupation over time.

Key Points:

Economic mobility = Changes in wealth or income.
Occupation mobility = Changes in job or career.
Social class mobility = Changes in social class status.

18
Q

rags to riches

A

used to describe a person’s rise from a state of extreme poverty to one of great wealth.
very american dream-y

19
Q

OECD countries

A

democracies with market-based economies collaborate to develop policy standards to promote sustainable economic growth (37-38 countries?)

20
Q

OECD Countries & Mobility

A

Definition:
OECD countries are 36 member nations focused on economic cooperation.

Key Points:

The U.S. has lower intergenerational mobility than almost all OECD countries.
In many OECD countries, it’s easier for children to surpass their parents’ economic status.

21
Q

Intergenerational Elasticity (IGE)

A

What it is:

Definition: A measure of how much parents’ income affects their children’s income.
Range: 0 to 1, where 0 means total mobility (children’s income isn’t tied to parents’) and 1 means no mobility (children’s income is entirely dependent on parents’).
Key Points:

U.S. IGE is estimated around 0.6, indicating low mobility.
Higher IGE means children’s income is more likely to mirror their parents’ income.

22
Q

Factors Affecting Social Mobility

A

What it is:

Inequality: Larger income gaps reduce mobility.
Residential Segregation: Income or racial divides in neighborhoods.
Quality of Schooling: Better schools improve chances of mobility.
Family Structure: Stable families can support better outcomes.
Social Capital: Networks and community support help mobility.
Key Points:

Places with integrated communities, good schools, and less income disparity have higher mobility.

23
Q

Policy Suggestions to Improve Mobility

A

What it is:

Remove Private Money from Politics: Give more voice to people benefiting from stronger social policies.
Bolster Housing-Voucher Programs: Help poorer families move into better neighborhoods.
Increase Taxes on the Wealthy: Redistribute wealth more evenly.
Encourage Savings for Lower/Middle-Income Workers: Improve their economic situations.
Key Points:

Extreme, politically challenging changes might be necessary to significantly improve mobility.

24
Q

Healthcare Costs in the U.S.

A

What it is:

Definition: In the U.S., healthcare costs are prohibitively high, creating barriers to social mobility for those without wealth or insurance.
Key Points:

Barrier to Mobility: High healthcare costs prevent lower-income families from accessing necessary treatments, locking them into poverty.
Exacerbates Inequality: Poor access to healthcare means that health issues further limit economic opportunities for lower-income groups.

25
Q

The 1% and Economic Inequality

A

What it is:

Definition: The top 1%, including figures like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, control a significant share of wealth, driving economic inequality.
Key Points:

Wealth Concentration: The top 1%’s wealth grows rapidly, widening the gap between the rich and everyone else.
Low Mobility: With wealth concentrated at the top, it’s harder for others to change their economic status.

26
Q

Social Stratification and Its Influences

A

What it is:

Hierarchical Structure: Society is divided into classes (upper, middle, lower), which impacts access to resources and opportunities.
Key Points:

Systemic Factors: Social stratification is shaped by race, gender, and geography, benefitting the powerful.
U.S. Context: Wealth and power are concentrated among the top 1%, rooted in historical inequalities.

27
Q

American Taxation System*

A

What it is:

Progressive Tax System: The U.S. tax system is meant to tax higher earners at higher rates, but loopholes often benefit the wealthy.
Key Points:

Loopholes and Deductions: Wealthy individuals and corporations reduce their tax burden through various legal deductions and loopholes.

28
Q

Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts

A

Corporate Tax Cuts: Reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, benefiting corporations and wealthy individuals.
Key Points:

Tax Cuts for the Wealthy: Significant breaks for the top 1%, increasing wealth inequality.
Impact: Led to higher deficits and reduced public services, with minimal benefits for the middle and working class.

29
Q

Impact of Trump’s Tax Cuts

A

What it is:

Result: The 2017 tax cuts led to an increased wealth gap, with the wealthy paying less and public services suffering.
Key Points:

Deficits and Inequality: The tax cuts were not offset by increased taxes on the wealthy, exacerbating economic inequality.

30
Q

Barriers to Social Mobility

A

Key Barriers:

Healthcare Costs:

Outrageous Costs: In the U.S., high healthcare costs prevent lower-income families from accessing necessary treatments, trapping them in poverty.
Economic Inequality:

The 1% Wealth Control: The top 1% hold a disproportionate share of wealth, reducing the ability of others to change their socioeconomic status.
Low Mobility: Concentrated wealth limits intergenerational mobility, making it harder for those born into lower classes to climb the economic ladder.
Education Disparities:

Quality of Education: Schools in affluent areas have more resources, while underfunded schools in poorer areas limit students’ opportunities, reinforcing inequality.
Rising Costs: The increasing cost of higher education and the student debt crisis burden lower-income students, hindering their upward mobility.
Residential Segregation:

Geographical Segregation: Income and racial segregation lead to under-resourced neighborhoods with limited access to quality schools, jobs, and healthcare.
Family Structure:

Single-Parent Households: These families often face greater financial strain, limiting the opportunities available to children compared to two-parent households.
Social Capital:

Connections Matter: Wealthier families often have influential networks that provide advantages in securing high-paying roles and opportunities, irrespective of merit.
Tax Policies and Inequities:

Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts: These cuts reduced the corporate tax rate and provided significant breaks to the wealthy, exacerbating the wealth gap and reducing public services.
Progressive Tax System Flaws: Despite being designed to tax higher earners more, loopholes and deductions often allow the wealthy to pay less relative to their income.
Belief in Meritocracy vs. Reality:

Systemic Inequalities: The ideal that hard work alone leads to success is challenged by systemic barriers, such as income disparities and unequal access to resources.
Cronyism and Nepotism: Wealth and connections frequently outweigh talent in determining success, undermining the meritocratic ideal.
Gender Dynamics:

Wage Gaps: Women face wage disparities and occupational segregation, which hinder their upward mobility compared to men.

31
Q

Belief in Meritocracy

A

What it is:

Definition: The idea that talent, effort, and determination solely determine success, rooted in the belief that “all men are created equal.”
Key Points:

Cultural Narrative: Promotes individualism and ignores societal and structural factors.
Rags-to-Riches Trope: Stories of figures like Oprah Winfrey reinforce this myth.

32
Q

Meritocracy in American Culture

A

Key Examples:

Education as a Ladder:
Promotes skill-building and critical thinking, theoretically fostering mobility.
Informality in Workplaces:
Claims to value skills over hierarchy, allowing talent to shine.
Rule of Law:
The justice system promises impartiality and fairness.

33
Q

Challenges to Meritocracy

A

Key Barriers:

Systemic Inequalities:
Income, education, and healthcare disparities trap marginalized groups in poverty.
Cronyism and Nepotism:
Wealth and connections often outweigh talent in securing opportunities.
Cultural Myths:
Media focuses on individual success stories, ignoring systemic barriers.

34
Q

Inequities in Education

A

Resource Disparities: Schools in wealthy areas have better resources.
College Admissions: Wealthy students benefit from costly extracurriculars, disadvantaging lower-income students.

35
Q

Role of Wealth and Influence

A

What it is:

Definition: Wealth often bypasses fairness, with resources granting access to better education, legal help, and opportunities.
Key Points:

Media Distraction: Focus on success stories diverts attention from systemic reform needs.

36
Q

Comparative Observations

A

What it is:

Rule of Law Critique: While the U.S. claims fairness, nepotism and cronyism are pervasive.
Key Points:

Personal Recommendations: Hiring based on connections reinforces class divisions.