7. Monopolies and the Three-Tier System Flashcards

1
Q

What is the only major outlet in Sweden that is allowed to sell alcohol?

A

Systembolaget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If a bar/restaurant in a country w/gov’t-run monopoly wants to purchase wine, how must they do it?

A

Either through the monopoly, e.g. Systembolaget, or from specialist independent distributors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the ultimate aim of a gov’t run monopoly?

How does it achieve this (3)?

A

To limit the sale/consumption of alcohol.

  • reducing the no. of venues where it may be purchased.
  • heavy taxation
  • reducing competition, which could lead to price pressure.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List the steps a producer must go through in order to have their wine sold in Systembolaget (4):

How long does the process generally take?

A
  1. Register w/an importer that is an approved supplier of System.
  2. 4 x a year, System issues tender requests for wine style/types it wishes to be stocked.
  3. Suppliers submit samples for consideration, which are tasted blind by a panel.
  4. If passed on, the samples are tasted again and sent for chemical analysis to confirm that they are identical to the samples.

Takes 7-8 months for entire process, from tasting to being sold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Despite the bureaucracy, what are the benefits of a Gov’t-Run Monopoly such as Systembolaget, for the gov’t/consumer/producer?

A

Gov’t: Heavy taxation = profits for gov’t; restriction of alcohol sales lessens strain on health system, reduces illness/accidents.

Consumer: Decisions are based on quality alone, as retailers do not promote any specific brand/style, i.e. consumers are receiving good quality wine.

Producer: opportunity for smaller producers to make inroads over big ones, as decisions are based on quality alone; though process is lengthy, if chosen, the producer’s wines will be stocked at all System stores, giving them the chance to sell large volumes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the Monopoly in Canada (3):

A
  • monopoly present in every province except Alberta.
  • e.g. in Ontario, all sales controlled by LCBO, either through their stores or approved agencies.
  • Alberta now has private market for wholesale distribution, but heavily monitored by Alberta Gaming and Liquor Commission.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Name/dates of the act that led to the USA’s 3-Tier System:

A

Volstead Act aka Prohibition.

1919-1933.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the original aim of the 3-Tier System (2)?

What benefits were the gov’t seeking (4)?

A
  • to prevent a return to the ‘saloon’ days of gambling, prostitution, cime, drunkenness.
  • to get rid of ‘tied houses’ (saloons which were required to buy all products from particular brewer/distiller) and prevent producer monopolies.

Benefits: increase prices (restricting sales), additional jobs, easier regulation + collection of taxes, generate revenue via taxes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 tiers of the 3-Tier System?

A
  1. Supplier (producer, importer)
  2. Distributor (wholesaler, broker)
  3. Retailer (on/off premise, supermarkets, bars/restaurants)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Though it is illegal to skip a step in the 3-Tier System (e.g., for a retailer to buy directly from a producer), what are some allowances in terms of ownership across the tiers (2)?

What is increasingly becoming an exception to these rules?

A

Producer may also be Importer (e.g. Gallo), but not Distributor.

Distributor may also Import (e.g. Republic National Distributing Co.) but cannot Produce.

Some states allow wineries (or breweries/micro-distilleries) to sell directly to consumers, usually with conditions attached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Given the complexity of the USA’s alcohol laws and their differences from state to state, what have some beverage companies introduced to ensure lawful compliance?

A

“Compliance Officers” to make sure that a companies practices are legal according to state/county rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 3 MAIN categories that (American) States fall into with regard to the 3-Tier system?

an e.g. of each?

A
  1. Control’ States; states in which the State itself holds monopoly over 1 or more of the 3 tiers, e.g. PA.
  2. Open’ States; those in which gov’t involvement is relatively minimal, e.g. NJ
  3. Franchise’ States; states that have laws severely restricting ability for suppliers to change distributor arrangements, e.g. CT.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How many Control States are there in the US?

4 e.g.s and how their laws differ?

A

17 total.

  1. Idaho: monopoly of off-premise sales of bevs >16% abv.
  2. Michigan: monopoly on wholesale of spirits.
  3. New Hampshire: beer/wine in grocery/convenience stores only, small no. of shops that specialize in smaller brands.
  4. Pennsylvania: all spirits sold in ‘package stores’, bars/restaurants must buy from them as well.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain what a Franchise State is and how it differs from an Open State:

A

States which severely restrict suppliers from changing distributor arrangements.

OPEN STATE: distr. may enter into agreement w/supplier, drop other suppliers, invest heavily in marketing, staffing, infrastructure etc..

FRANCHISE STATE: Appt of distributor is essentially a ‘lifetime appointment’; little recourse for supplier if dissatisfied w/performance. They may appoint additional distributors as a result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the main benefit of establishing a Franchise State?

A
  • protects Distributor from catastrophic loss of revenue if supplier decides to suddenly pull out of agreement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Using Connecticut as an example, describe how state alcohol laws can be very complex (4):

PROS (2) / CON (1)?

A
  • v. strong franchise law.
  • limited # of off-premise licenses available (by entity/city/town); leads to businesses buying each other simply to obtain license.
  • no quant. discounts from distributors = no advantage for bulk buyers.
  • min. bottle pricing for any given wine to be sold.

PROS: many small businesses prosper; warded off consolidation of sales.

CONS: ‘border wars’, customers crossing state lines to purchase alc for less $, at any time, greater selection/availability.

17
Q

Main arguments FOR 3-Tier System (4)?

A

FOR: significant tax revenue; ‘restriction’ of sales lessens strain on health systems, reduces excessive drinking, injury/illness IN THEORY; logistical efficiency and service to all areas of the country; trained sales/marketing force provides producer w/exposure which might be too $$ otherwise.

18
Q

Explain the challenges faced by smaller producers created by CONSOLIDATION in the US market over the last 2 decades (3):

What are the BENEFITS for larger companies (2)?

A

No. of distributors has FALLEN (3,000 to 1,200) while no. of US wineries has RISEN (2,000 to 9,500+).

Creates bottleneck, smaller producers get lost in bigger portfolios along side major brands/congolmerates.

Reduces producer’s control over marketing/B2B sales.

BENEFITS:

  • accumulation of smaller wineries increases portfolio/range of brands/styles/pricepoints etc…
  • large distributor needs to deal with only 1 or 2 large companies that have many desirable brands.
19
Q

How can smaller producers circumvent the problems posed by CONSOLIDATION of distributors/larger companies (2)?

What considerations must be made (3)?

A
  • seek out smaller specialist dist. that focus on low-volume, boutique brands.
  • increase DTC sales (cellar door, shipping)

CONSIDERATIONS:

  • smaller distr.s are limited in scope/coverage.
  • distr. contracts can be hard to break, smaller producers do not have negotiating power.
  • associated costs with DTC sales (labor/advertising/shipping/legal compliance with different states).