7 International Strategies - Model Of Strategic Forces Flashcards
What two strategic pressures do firms face while developing their international strategy? (The two pressures are conflicting)
1) Global Integration
Pressure to standardize
2) Local Responsiveness
Pressures to disperse configuration
What drives global integration (what are the pressures)
1) globalization helps standardise consumer preferences
2) markets are globalizing -> generate high touch products
3) technology enables mass standardization
4) economies of scale make products cheaper
What are the pressures for local responsiveness?
1) consumer divergence
2) cultural specifity & historical legacy
3) nationalism
4) host govt policies
Examples for host govt policies that create pressure towards local responsiveness
- tax regimes
- business regulations
- grants/incentives offered to companies
What does low pressure for global integration entail
Standardization and centralization: useful but not necessary across international operations
What does high pressure for global integration entail?
Standardization and centralization: imperative (crucial) across international operations
What does low pressure for local responsiveness entail?
Adaptation and decentralization: unnecessary to sell generic products to similar markets
What does high pressure for local responsiveness entail?
Adaptation and decentralisation: needed to sell customised product to differing markets
International strategy
- Leverages core competencies + home country innovations into foreign markets
- critical elements of value chain centralized at headquarters
Multidomestic strategy
Differentiate products to respond to national differences in:
1) customer preferences
2) industry characteristics
3) govt regulation
- value added activities adapted to local markets (e.g. products feature)
Global strategy
- standardized products: marketed with little adaptions to local conditions
- exploits location economies + economies of scale
- Target universal needs that support selling standardized products worldwide
- Emphasize:
1) volume
2) cost minimization
3) efficiency
When does a multidomestic strategy work well?
1) companies are strong at subsidiary level
2) capacity to respond locally important
3) no significant economic pressures for global integration
When does an international strategy work well?
1) firm has competencies that foreign rivals lack
2) no significant economic pressures for global integration
3) local responsiveness not crucial
International strategy: pressure for global integration/local responsiveness
- low pressure for global integration
- low pressure for local responsiveness
Disadvantage international strategy
Missed opportunities from having too much concentration at HQ and little input from foreign subsidiaries
Multidomestic strategy: pressures for local responsiveness/global integration
- high pressure local responsiveness
- low pressure global integration
Disadvantage multidomestic strategy
- costly: need of adaptation to local market characteristics
When does global strategy work well?
- MNEis cost leader
- worldwide standardization possible
- large economies of scale to be captured
- local responsiveness not crucial
Global strategy: pressure for local responsiveness/global integration?
- low pressure local responsiveness
- high pressure global integration
Disadvantage global strategy
Cost reductions and standardization do not allow for adaption to local markets
Transnational strategy
- leverage core competencies worldwide
- reduce costs by exploiting local economies
- adapts to local market conditions
=> simultaneously manage global integration and local differentiation in in ways that leverage specialized knowledge and promote worldwide learning
When does transnational strategy work well?
1) global learning emphasized
2) knowledge flows within comp
3) sophisticated internal mgt and control systems
4) capacity to respond locally is important
5) large economies of scale to be captured
Transnational strategy: pressure for local responsiveness/global integration
- high pressure local responsiveness
- high pressure for global integration
Disadvantage transnational strategy
Complicated and difficult to implement