7/8. Industrial Revolution (from card 16 - spread of IR) Flashcards
What was the main catalyst of Industrial Revolution?
- Technology is at the heart of the industrial revolution
- Technology brought England into ‘modern economic growth’ - quantitative and qualitative changes
Qualitative changes that drive IR
– urbanization
– industrial jobs
– international trade composition
– factory system
Effects of introduction of technology on urbanisation (UK)
- 1851 - >50%
- 1900 - 75%
Tech on distribution of jobs changes (UK)
From 1710 to 1871:
- % of people working in agriculture dropped more than half
- % of people working in industry increased by 15%
- % of people working in services increased by 160%
- although no. of people working in serv < in industry
Tech on imports and exports in Britain
- British raw cotton imports: 25k in 1800 to 500k in 1860
- British exports ratio to national income, 1700‐1913:
- fluctuates but general trend is increasing
- 0.09 in 1700 to 0.20 in 1900
GDP per capita growth in 1830‐1870 (UK)
1.98% per year
Why quantitative change was slow to come about?
- Technological innovation was unevenly distributed across industries
- Industries affected by innovation were very small at the beginning
- New technologies were
- highly specific, the steam engine being the only GPT (General Purpose Technology)
- relatively simple and concentrated in one single stage of the production process
- Going from inventions to innovative products and production processes did not happen overnight
- the relationship between technological innovation and scientific research was at best weak
- lack of skills
- At the beginning of the IR, innovative activity was possibly inhibited by small market size and poor protection of intellectual property rights
- Moreover, the tech innovations of late 18th century had a deep effect on the British economy because of developments that had been under way for over a century
What do prerequisites and concomitants (developments) concern?
- population
- transport infrastructure
- agriculture
- commerce & banking
- institutions (political framework, economic policies, and cultural climate)
- Prerequisites are about what made the English ‘economic soil’ fertile for industrialization
Population role in IR
Population is a concomitant (naturally accompanying or associated) development of the IR rather than a prerequisite
Reasons for pop growth
- slight increase in fertility
- declining mortality due to better diet, medical improvements, etc.
- massive internal migrations
- urbanization
- geographical redistribution of pop density
2 reasons why pop mattered for economic growth
- supply of labour
- demand for manufactured goods
Agriculture revolution
- In the 17th century, the productivity of agriculture increased substantially
- ⟶ milk per cow up 3.8 times from 1300 to 1800
- ⟶ sheep fleece up from 1.5 lbs. to 3.5
- ⟶ wheat per acre up from 10 to 20 bushels in 1300‐1700
- These results were obtained by means of new techniques
- selection of seeds and breeds
- introduction of new crops ⟶ clover, turnips, peas, beans
- crop rotation, etc.
- enclosures, larger size of the avg field
Domestic trade vs foreign trade during the period
- Domestic trade developed fast in the 17th and 18th centuries driven by London demand and improving transport facilities
- Foreign trade developed no less impressively
- end 17th century: value of per capita trade was second highest inEurope
- 1750:England=world’s largest trading country
- • Major changes
- shift in trading partners
- shift in exchanged goods: ever more exports of textiles and manufactures; ever more imports of raw materials (sugar, tea, tobacco, timber and grain)
- Foreign markets = crucial supplementary outlet for British industrial goods
Commerce and role of trade
- Role of trade in the 18th century went beyond accumulation of wealth (and redistribution of de facto political power): it triggered developments
- in the banking sector
- in contract enforcement legislation
- development of entrepreneurship
- learning process about the functioning of the capitalist economy
- ⟶made it easier to take advantage of the tech opportunities of the IR
- Finally, international trade caused urban growth, hence contributed to stimulating agricultural productivity and made for high wages
Banking developments during IR
- • Prompted by domestic and international trade, a banking sector started to emerge gradually from the 2nd half of the 17th century
- In London
- the Bank of England (1694) catered to government financial needs, administered public debt, and issued banknotes
- former goldsmiths turned private bankers (merchant bankers) engaged in accepting deposits, discounting bills of exchange arising from international trade, making loans
- outside of London
- ‘country banks’ issued banknotes, financed domestic trade, moved money across the country, lent financial resources to local industrial enterprises
The role of transport infrastructure
- Investment in transport infrastructure made for
- the unification of the domestic market
- more efficient allocation of the factors of production, both at the firm level and economy‐wide (⟶ regional specialization, Smithian growth)
- 1660s–1749: Parliament passed a lot of legislation to improve navigability of rivers and harbours’ capacity
- 1750‐1820s: apogee of canal constructions
- waterway transport freight rates were 50‐75% cheaper than land transport
- ca. 3,000 miles of navigable waterways were added to the existing 1,000 miles; some £17 million was invested in the process
- by 1840, Britain had >7,000 miles of navigable waterways connecting all major centres of production and consumption
Constructions and developments of roads as prereq for IR
- trusts were responsible for short stretches
- usually raised funds and repaid them out of tolls collected on road users
- previously, local government authorities were in charge of road construction and maintenance; they did so via taxation (property taxes) and forced labour (⟶ low efficiency)
- By 1840, 1/5 of total road mileage was under the control of trusts
- Btw mid‐18th century and 1830s, freight costs were reduced by 40% and travel times by 60%