15. New challenges of the globalised world Flashcards
Globalisations in history
- 1st wave (16th-17th cent): trade
- 2nd wave (1870-1914): foreign direct investment (FDI)
- 3rd wave (1989-): portfolio inv
First 2 waves’ purposes: global markets for goods and services
3rd wave: for money and credit
BOP equation
= current account + capital account
= balance of trade + net income + FDI + portfolio inv
Balance of trade - 1st wave
Net income and FDI - 2nd wave
portfolio inv - 3rd wave
Factors of financial liberalization
- Technical progress
- Neoliberal ideology
- Deliberate intervention by nation states and international organizations
Technical progress
- financial regime differs radically from its precursors in that it was not built by politicians, economists, central bankers or finance ministers, nor did high- level international conferences produce a master plan. It was built by technology
- assembling a global financial marketplace that would replace the Bretton Woods agreements and, over time, alter political structures.
- => no form of political sovereignty that can over shadow capital movements.
- quoted W. B. Wriston, ‘Technology and Sovereignty’
Neoliberal ideology
- Wall Street Treasury proceeded on the self-serving assumption that the ideal world is indeed one of free capital flows, with the IMF and its bailouts despite the evidence of the inherent risks
- idea revolves around encouraging the trade of goods and services but restrict the trade of money and credit.
- quoted Jagdish N. Bhagwati, ‘The Capital Myth: The Difference between Trade in Widgets and Dollars’
Deliberate intervention
- deregulation: abolition of restrictions on capital movements
- this leads to more effective crisis prevention and management: “lender of last resort” (LOLR)
- 1987-2006: “The Federal Reserve, consistent with its responsibilities as the Nation’s central bank, affirmed today its readiness to serve as a source of liquidity to support the economic and financial system.”
Definition of seigniorage
- difference between the value of money and the cost to produce it (profit)
- Such income reflects the return on interest-bearing assets that are financed by the issuance of currency, which pays no interest, or at most a below-market rate, to the holder.’
Globalisations of crises
- “Oil shocks”
- Petrodollars invested in LDCs
- Series of debt defaults:
- ’80s LDC (least developed countries) debt crises
- 1995 Mexico
- 1997 Southeast Asia
- 1998 Russia
- 2001 Argentina
- Capital inflows and crises in the emerging markets at the center:
- new economy
- subprime mortgages
- sovereign debts
- => localised credit risk to global liquidity risk
The African Crisis: Facts and Figures
- 1975-1999: GNP per capita of Sub-Saharan Africa dropped from 17.6% to 10.5%
- Infant mortality increased: 107 per 1000 births
- adult-literacy fell
- 34% of region are classified as undernourished
- Life expectancy of 49
- 9% of 15-49 have HIV/AIDS
Overview of Berg Report
- The report was written in response to a 1979 request from the African Governors of the World Bank for a paper analyzing the development problems facing African countries
- It also responds to a set of policies determined by African Chiefs of State in 1980, called the Lagos Plan of Action.
- While the Lagos Plan endorsed inward-looking policies of African self-reliance, the Berg report advocated for outward-looking policies of increased international trade.
Political causes from Berg Report of World Bank
- based on 2 assumptions:
- gov failed to understand negative effects of bad polices
- positive effects of good policies once implemented will not benefit them or the elites - undermined their power
- highly internalist and state-minimalist
- African gov policies undermined dev by destroying agricultural producers’ incentive to increase outputs and exports
- heavily protected manufacturing industries and excessive state intervention
- substantial currency devaluation
- substitution of private for public enterprise—not just in industry but also in the provision of social services
- used the powerful instruments of economic control that they had inherited from colonial regimes to benefit urban elites and themselves
- surplus absorption (Arrighi) - consumption of urban elites and sub-elites in bureaucratic employment, the relatively high mass consumption of ‘labour aristocracies’ and the transfer abroad of profits, interests, dividends and fees of various kinds => restrain growth of agricultural productivity and domestic markets => perpetuated dependence of African economies on growth of world demand for primary products
Lagos’ Plan of Action
- heads of state of the OAU (Organisation of African Unities) traced the crisis to a series of external shocks.
- growing protectionism of wealthy countries
- soaring interest rates
- growing debt service commitments
- => resolution of the crisis relies on:
- capacity of African states to mobilize national resources and foster greater mutual economic integration and cooperation rather than world-market mechanisms
- empowerment that African states derived from continent’s formal decolonization
- further reinforced by APPER (Africa’s Priority Programme for Economic Recovery, 1986–1990
APPER v. Lagos Plan
- APPER openly acknowledged the responsibilities of African governments for the crisis, and the limitations of any actions undertaken by African states on their own => variety of policy reforms consistent with the Berg Report
- => asked the international community to take action to:
- ease the crushing burden of Africa’s external debt
- stabilize and increase the prices paid for their exports.
- => UNPAAERD (United Nations Programme of Action for African Economic Recovery and Development, 1986–1990)
Backfire of structural-adjustments programmes
- Started with growing number of African states subjected themselves to IMF and World Bank
- NPE (New Political Economy) and World Bank started to revise their neo-utilitarian, state-minimalist prescriptions and to emphasize the role of institutions and ‘good governance’
- World Development Report, adhered after structural-adjustment prog., put even greater responsibility on African elites and governments for the failure of their economies to recover and for the social disasters accompanying that failure.
- => African compliance with IMF and World Bank were followed in short order by ever more pessimistic assessments of the capabilities of African governments and elites to resolve the long-standing crisis
Pros of surplus absorption
capable of stimulating agricultural productivity as it can attack on the privileges
=> economic dev of Africa can be characterised as “perverse growth” - growth which undermines rather than enhances the potentialities of the economy for long-term growth
Uneven development of African crisis
- four in North Africa and the remaining sixteen in Sub-Saharan Africa had exceptionally good performances which compare very favour- ably with those of the ‘miracle’ economies of East Asia => have no ‘character flaw’ that makes them incapable of sustained development
- a larger group of experiences (8) that began in the 1960s and ended in the 1970s, and a smaller group (4) that began in the 1980s
- smaller group consists of countries that had disastrous developmental experiences in earlier years => scope for growth
Post-1975 phenomenon figures
- decline in the number of success stories that started in successive sub-periods: from eight in 1960–64, to three in 1965–69, to one in 1970–74, to none in 1975–79.
- a post-1975 phenomenon as up to 1975, the African performance was not much worse than that of the world average and better than that of South Asia
- integral to a major change in the inter-regional unevenness of Third World economic performance
Capitalism as cause of crisis
- driver for cons of surplus absorption
- integration of economies in the global circuits of capital contributed to “high mass- consumption levels of assorted ‘labour aristocracies’ “
- easy import substitution would involve a tightening of the constraints that world capitalism imposed on national development in Africa.
- crisis of profitability: world- wide intensification of competitive pressures on business enterprises ensued from the great expansion of world trade and production of the 1950s and 1960s:
- crisis of legitmacy derived from crisis of profitability - Keynesian policies and ideologies (sustain worldwide expansion of trade and production in 50s-60s
Crisis of profitability
- combined with inflation of oil rents
- => routinely deposited in Western banks and ‘extra-territorial’ financial markets => over-abundant/excess liquidity => recycled as loan capital on highly favourable terms to Third and Second World countries
- growing’ and the distribution of income and wealth ‘severely skewed
- competitive pressures had become particularly intense in manufacturing industries => demand for imports are industrial rather than agricultural - African strength; imported instead from North America since they possessed more capital to invest in industrial sector
- Third World countries were bearing the social costs of increasing industrialization and urbanization without the economic benefits they had expected to reap
Crisis of legitimacy
- Keynesian policies counterproductive due to increased competition that exhausted resources
- increasing social and economic costs of US reliance on coercion to contain the Communist challenge in the Third World
- US gov opted for economic policies:
- drastic contraction in money supply
- higher interest rate
- lower taxes for the wealthy
- unrestricted freedom of action for capitalist enterprise
- => compete aggressively for capital worldwide, to finance a growing trade and current account deficit in its own balance of payments (due to spending on coercion of Communist regime)
- => world’s main debtor nation and the largest recipient of foreign capital (1980s)
- => provoking a sharp increase in real interest rates worldwide—and a major reversal in the direction of global capital flows.
- => deflate capital flows to African countries
Crisis of development project
- attainment of high rates of growth of GNP left:
- infant mortality ‘high’
- life expectancy ‘low’
- illiteracy ‘widespread’
- unemployment ‘endemic
Shift of political power as cause of crisis
- the shift:
- US debacle in Vietnam
- Portuguese defeat in Africa
- Israeli difficulties in the 1973 War
- the entry of the PRC into the Security Council of the United Nations
- caused by first and second oil shocks
- 1st: followed the Kippur War of 1973 as a form of retaliation of the Arab oil producers against the Western countries, which had given their support to Israel
- 2nd: Iranian Rev + Soviet invasion of Afghanistan + war with Iraq => further hike in oil prices (disrupted oil production) + crisis of confidence in the US dollar
- combined with crisis of US hegemony (economic powerhouse that controlled capital flows) meant worsening terms of trade for most non-oil-producing Third World countries.
Emergence of Washington Consensus
- accompanied the change in US policies in the military and financial spheres
- a set of 10 economic policy prescriptions considered to constitute the “standard” reform package promoted for crisis-wracked developing countries by Washington, D.C.-based institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank and United States Department of the Treasury.
- 3rd world countries were recommended to open up their national economies to:
- intensifying world-market competition
- rival each other and First World countries in creating within their jurisdictions the greatest possible freedom of movement and action for capitalist enterprise
- => contributed to consolidating the bifurcation in the fortunes of Third World regions.
Dependence on foreign capital as cause of crisis
dependence became unsustainable due to the redirection of capital flows to the US => regions became vulnerable