6.3 Goals Flashcards
Goals in “Touching the Void”
Keep in mind: - Goals are well modelled by the VE, unlike habits - 4 Dimensions of a good goal: Easy vs difficult (ideal) Achievable (ideal) vs impossible Long term vs short term (ideal) Specific (ideal) vs unspecific
Took 3 days to get back to camp.
He timed himself by reaching landmark in 30 minutes. These are very short term goals. He is not focused on the camp. Landmarks give feedback of progress
What is Joe’s long term goal? Getting back to camp
What is Joe’s short term goal? Landmarks
Which one has a direct impact on his situation? Short term
Goals are directive
Goals direct attention and effort towards goal relevant activities and away from anything else
Study: Students with specific learning goals paid attention to and learned goal relevant prose passages better than the goal-irrelevant passages
Study: People who were given feedback on driving tasks improved performance on the dimensions for which they had goals, but not on other dimensions
Goals energize
Goals increase effort, and difficult goals lead to greater effort than easier goals
Goals prolong effort
Goals prolong effort and affect persistence.
When participants are allowed to control the time they spend on a task, difficult goals increase the length of time of work
What is the difference between energising and prolonging effort? Energize is increase effort, prolonging makes effort go a longer way
Trade off between length and intensity of effort
- Work faster and more intensely for a short period
- Work slower and less intensely for longer
Goals guide the work
Goals automatically use knowledge and skills they have already acquired when it is relevant to achieve the goal
If the goal does not use the skills they have, people adapt other skills from related contexts to it
If the task is completely new, they plan for it and develop strategies that allow them to succeed
Summary:
- Goals are like landmarks
- Landmarks are useful to guide and orient the work
- Landmarks can lead to discover task-specific knowledge or techniques
Go back to Joe’s text and identify passages that leverage these benefits
Uninterested Math Students study
Group of children uninterested and not doing well in Maths
Self-directed learning practice
Looked at performance + self-efficacy + interest
Question:
Protocol: Pre-test | Pre SE (self-efficacy) Self-directed training (4 conditions) Post1 SE | post test | Post2 SE Interest: Free choice activities
Conditions: Control (no training) No goals Long-term goals Short-term and long-term goals
Measuring:
Conclusion: Review slide Best to worst Performance: Short term long term No goals Long term Control
Best to worst SE: Short term long term No goals Long term (pre to post 1 increase, post 1 to post 2 decrease) Control (decrease both times)
Best to worst Interest: Short term long term No goals Control Long term (counter productive to self-efficacy)
Urging people to do their best
Specific and difficult goals lead to higher performance than urging people to do their best
When people are asked to do their best, they do not do so
Why is it like this? Imagine someone giving you such advice
Do-your-best goals have no external reference. Very vague
No clear sense of what best is
Goals should be specific as possible, but also define a clear level of difficult
Specificity is not sufficient
Goal commitment
The relation between setting goals and improved performance is strongest when people are commuted to their goals. Commitments especially important when goals are difficult and challenging
Can we use the VE to understand why goal commitments is particularly important when the goals are difficult and challenging? Requires higher effort (negative reward) and lower chance of success
2 types of factors facilitate goal commitment:
- Believing that achieving the goal is important (higher positive reward)
- Believing that the goal is achievable (Higher pS self-efficacy)
Goal importance “hacks”:
- Public commitment
- Rationale (understand why it’s important)
- Participatory (everyone has a sense of ownership)
- Self-directed
Relation here with self-determination theory
Goals and self-efficacy:
- Get adequate training to increase mastery
- role modelling
- Persuasive communication
Goals and the Value Equation
Review graph
Multiple short term goals spike 3 times, rather than the single long term goal
With procrastination, we work on short term goals 3 times, rather than the single long term goal
This shows what can happen when we break a single long term goal into multiple short term goals
In terms of the VE and setting goals, what are the potential benefits of breaking a task in to several sub tasks?
Create new rewards. Delays are shorter, choose pS by gauging how difficult goal is