6. Policial institutions: state capacity, nation and state building Flashcards
state capture
idea that in an autocratic regime there is often an overlap between state, regime, and government
how states developed
- from hunter-gatherers, to herders, to agriculture (settling).
- agriculture enabled city-states, empires, and nation-states
- as humans shifted from nomadic ways of living to settling, territorial forms of political organisation developed
modern european states
(vroeger)
- modern because there is more centralisation of power and institutions that govern a large part of territory
- “war built the state”, kings engaged in wars which required money, they did this through taxes. this required bureaucrats and a police force.
- institutions for taxation became the first state institution
- state-building is rarely peaceful.
- nation-states are a relatively recent phenomenon, states are much older.
colonisation and state-building
- modern state spread to european settler colonies only
- when decolonisation happened, these state structures were left behind
- important to make distinction between two waves of decolonisation
- early decolonisation in latin america early 1800s: haiti independence triggered independence movements all over, spanish empire was weak so there was an opportunity
- late decolonisation in africa and asia: after ww2, they had to fight in the war and wanted independence in return for it. started with india and others followed
- colonisation has had important consequences for state structures, even after decolonisation
left behind a lot of different social groups in a state, which made state-building afterwards very difficult
nation-states
- recent idea that the boundaries of the state should also include a common nation.
- older empires didn’t have a problem with multiple groups in one nation, so it’s more of an old european idea
- creating cohesion between people vs suppressing regional identities?
nations
- a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a state or territory.
- they do a claim to statehood or self-rule, they do not necessarily have their own state
- they have aspirations for self-government and sovereignty
ethnic groups
- a community or population made up of people who share a common cultural background or descent
- they don’t have to have a nation or necessarily want to be a nation
imagined communities
- nations are imagined communities, creating an identity and a sense of belonging to a political community
- state trying to create a common identity to create a stable state
nationalism
- early on it was an ideology of liberation and a unifying force: ataturk in turkey creating story on who the turkish are and unifying them to leave the ottoman empire
- in europe earlier used as a unification program to create political communities: france.
- key question for democracy: who is part of the demos? who do we consider legitimate others, or legitimate co-citizens?
how do social structures affect democratisation
- social structures can be economic classes, ethnic, linguistic, and religious hetereogeneity.
- affects democratisation in that hetereogeneity is less stable to rule over.
- it’s harder to stabilise because they might contest other groups coming into power
- there are also peaceful nations with different social groups, so they can form alliances to push for democratisation (or autocratisation)
- can also create conflict and instability, resource differential, identity bias, and mobilisation.
ways of dealing with different social groups
- equal rights
- political influence
- minimise resource differential
- create common identity
- find ways to share power
core idea is that when countries become independent, you need to establish the boundaries of the state and who belongs to the demos. otherwise democratisation is more difficult.
state capacity
- the capability to rule a state, the ability of state institutions to effectively implement official goals
- there are strong and weak states
state autonomy
- capacity of a state to make its own decisions
- a state can be strong but not autonomous or weak but autonomous
three types of state capacity
- coercive capacity: states’ capacity to maintain their monopoly and deliver a minimum level of security for citizens
- administrative capacity: states’ capacity to implement policies and deliver basic public services
- extractive capacity: states’ capacity to generate resources
extractive capacity important for sustaining both coercive and administrative capacity
how does state capacity affect democratisation?
- regime neutral stabiliser
- with strong state capacity autocracies can provide security to keep citizens happy which can stabilise the regime. they can monitor citizens, oppress people, and get rid of opposition
- can stabilise democracy because with strong institutions you can provide better public services and security
- weak state capacity in autocracies can make it more difficult to control the citizens rising up against you, which destabilises the regime
- weak state capacity in democracies can make citizens unhappy and make them want to go back to autocracy