6. cooperative alliances Flashcards
altruism
-> benefiting another individual at a cost to onself
- psychological
if there is an underlying motivation to increase the welfare of others - biological
actions that increase the reproductive success of others
while reducing the fitness of the actor -> rare cuz selected against in evolution - cooperation
working together for mutual benefits
altruism
-> 6 evolutionary explanations
- mistake or by-product
e.g. nurse salary, would they still help if they didn’t get paid? - kin altruism
Help their offspring and kin because they share genetic material
Inclusive fitness: hamilton’s rule c < rb
C = cost to actor
r = degree of genetic relatedness
b = benefit to recipient
Costs and benefits are measured in reproductive currency - reciprical altruism
direct -> help someone if they can expect smth in retun - indirect reciprocity
return from someone else than the direct recipient - costly signalling
help because helping signals smth good about them -> peacock’s tail - group selection
help at a personal cost for the good of the group
biological / cultural selection
kinship and survival
traditional societies
- mothers + grandmothers have an especially pronounced influence on the survival of children
inheritance as kin altruism
- leave more estate to genetically related kin and spouses
- leave more to close kin than to distantly related kin
- leave more to offspring than to siblings
reciprocal altruism
prisoner’s dilemma
- solution tit for tat
cooperate on the first move and every move after
never be first to defect / retaliate after the other has defected / be forgiving
conditions
- cost actor lower than benefit recipient
- recognize others and detect cheaters
- repeated play
adaptions for cheater detection?
social brain hypothesis
expanding circles
- our relationships form a hierarchical inclusive series of circles of increasing size but decreasing intensity
altruism via indirect reciprocity
language
- tests people’s reputation through gossip
-> cheaters can be excluded from our circles
two costly signal
altruism as peackock’s tail
- darwin’s sexual selection hypothesis
- suggests that altruim evolved as a mating signal such that individuals compete dor sexual partners by being generous - war heroism
- found greater reproductive success
- rated sexually more attractive
- male more attractive than female war heroes
group selection and altruism
selfishness beats altruism within groups
altruism beats selfishness between groups
the rest is commentary
genetic or cultural group selection