5.2 Variance analysis - Material Variances & Labour variances Flashcards
Direct materials total variance is the difference between
- The actual direct material cost and
- The std direct material cost of the actual production
The total material variance can be analysed into two sub variances:
- Direct material price variance, ie. paying more or less than expected for materials
- Direct material usage variance, ie. using more or less material than expected for the actual output
Direct material price variance is calculated as the difference between
Actual purchase price
Less: Std purchase price X Actual qty of materials purchased / used
- If raw material inventory is valued at std cost then the price variance is calculated based on materials purchased in period (whether used or not)
- If raw material inventory is valued at actual cost the the price variance is based on materials used in the period
Direct material usage variance is calculated as the difference between
Actual qty used
Less: Std qty
= Direct materials usage variance (in qty)
x Std price (per unit of material)
= Direct materials usage variance
Potential causes of material price variances
- Using a different supplier who is either cheaper (F) or more expensive (A)
- Buying larger sized orders and getting larger bulk purchase discounts (F) or buying in smaller sized orders and losing planned bulk purchase discounts (A)
- An unexpected increase in prices charged by supplier (A)
- Unexpected buying costs such as high delivery charges (A)
- Efficient (F) or inefficient (A) buying procedures
- A change in material quality (increased quality = more expensive = A; reduced quality = cheaper = F)
Potential causes of material usage variances
- A higher (A) than expected or lower (F) than expected rate of scrap or wastage
- Using a different quality of material could affect wastage rate (higher quality = less wastage = F; lower quality = more wastage = A)
- Defective materials (A)
- Better quality control (F)
- More efficient work procedures resulting in better material usage rates (F)
- Changing the labour mix which impacts on wastage if different types of labour make more / less errors (higher grade labour = less errors = F; lower grade labour = more errors = A)
- Changing the materials mix to obtain a more expensive (better quality = F) or less expensive (reduced quality = A) mix than the std
Labour variances
Total labour variance
- Labour rate variance (paying more or less than expected per hour for labour)
- Labour efficiency variance (using more or less labour hours per unit than expected)
- Idle time variance
Direct labour total variance
Actual cost of direct labour for actual units
Less: Std direct labour cost of actual production
Direct labour rate variance
Actual cost for Actual hours worked
Less: Actual hours worked X Std rate per hour
Direct labour efficiency variance
Actual hours worked for actual units
Less: Actual units X Std hours
X std hourly rate
When idle time occurs the efficiency variance should be separated into
- An idle time variance (hours paid exceed the hours worked)
If no std this variance is always adverse (represents money wasted) - An efficiency variance during active working hours
Possible causes of labour rate variances
- An unexpected increase in basic rates of pay (A)
- Payments of bonuses where recorded as direct labour costs (A)
- Using labour that is more experienced (more expensive = A) or less experienced (less expensive = F) than the std
- A change in composition of work force and therefore change in average rates of pay (increase = A; reduction = F)
Possible causes of labour efficiency variances
- Taking more or less time than expected to complete work due to inefficient or efficient working (more time = A; less time = F)
- Using labour that is more experienced (more efficient = F) or less experienced (less efficient = A) than the std
- A change in the composition or mix of workforce and therefore change in level of efficiency (more efficient = F; less efficient = A)
- Improved working methods (F)
- Industrial action by work force (A)
- Poor supervision (A)
- Improvements in efficiency due to an unexpected learning effect amongst work force (F)
- Unexpected lost time due to production bottlenecks and resource shortages (A)