5.1 Managing Suspects & Offenders Flashcards

1
Q

Sec 202A (5) - What is a defence to Possession of Offensive Weapons or Disabling Substances?

A

It is a defence if the person charged proves that he did not intend to use the offensive weapon or disabling substance to commit an offence involving bodily injury or the threat or fear of violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What would constitute an unlawful peaceful assembly?

A

It must have a serious and aggressive effect on people or property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the threshold for demonstrations behavior to be an offence or breach of the peace?

A

The behavior must either substantially inhibit other people from enjoying their right to use the public amenity or cause greater offence than those affected can be expected to tolerate, to the extent that it is seriously disruptive of public order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an unreasonable search (2)?

A

1) If the circumstances give rise to make the search itself unreasonable
2) or if the search is carried out in an unreasonable manner.

Unlawful searches will almost always be unreasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who must the Bill of Rights Caution be given to?

A
  • adults who are arrested or detained, or where Police want to question an adult where there is sufficient evidence to charge that person with an offence
  • children or young persons when detained or arrested and in accordance with sec 215 OT Act, before questioning a child or young when there are reasonable grounds to suspect them of having committed an offence or before asking any child or young person any question intended to obtain an admission of an offence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If during an interview, a detainee asks to speak to a lawyer, what should you do?

A

Stop the interview until they have contacted a lawyer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If a person has been told to remain silent by a lawyer, does this prohibit Police from asking further questions of that person?

A

No - there is no prohibition on further questioning by the Police after the right to silence has been asserted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can a person waive their right to consult a lawyer?

A

Yes provided that this is done clearly and with full knowledge of that right. A valid waiver requires a conscious choice that is both informed and voluntary, and it cannot be implied from silence or failure to request their rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a statement?

A

A statement is a spoken or written assertion of any matter or non verbal conduct that is intended as an assertion of any matter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is evidence offered by the prosecution of a statement made by a co-defendant in a proceeding admissible?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the three rules of evidence relating to inadmissible statements made by a defendant.

A
  1. Reliability Rule - The judge will determine the likely reliability of statement.
  2. Oppression Rule - Once an evidential foundation is established to raise the issue of whether a defendant’s statement was influenced by oppression, the prosecution must satisfy the judge BRD that the statement was not influenced by oppression.
  3. Improperly Obtained Evidence - The judge will carry out the balancing test as whether the impropriety is proportionate to the exclusion of the evidence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

According to section 28 of the Evidence Act 2006, when must a judge exclude an unreliable statement?

A

The judge must exclude the statement unless satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the circumstances in which the statement was made were not likely to have adversely affected its reliability.

Statements are typically judged on their likely reliability, given the circumstances under which it was taken, rather than the actual reliability. The balance of probabilities is the threshold for reliability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Section 29 - When must a judge exclude a statement influenced by oppression?

A

The judge must exclude the statement unless satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the statement was not influenced by oppression.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When deciding whether to exclude a possibly unreliable statement, which four relevant factors will the judge take into account?

A
  1. Physical and mental condition of the defendant.
  2. Defendant characteristics such as disabilities.
  3. Nature and manner of questions put to the defendant.
  4. Nature of any threat, promise, or representation made to the defendant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does oppression mean?

Evidence Act 2006 - s.29 The Oppression Rule.

A

Oppressive, violent, inhuman, or degrading conduct towards, or treatment of the defendant or another person;

OR

a threat of conduct or treatment of that kind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Everyone charged with an offence has the right to…. (3)

A

1) The right to consult and instruct a lawyer
2) The right to adequate time and facilities to prepare a defence
3) Informed promptly and in detail of the nature of the allegation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Can you arrest for an anticipated Breach of the Peace?

A

No power of arrest for an anticipated breach of the peace. The proper procedure where a breach is anticipated and the persons concerned failed to desist is to arrest for obstruction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are two exceptions to the reliability rule regarding a defendant’s statement (2)?

A

1) Where the prosecution wishes to use the statement as evidence of the defendant’s “physical, mental, or psychological condition…at the time the statement was made”.
2) Where the prosecution offers the defendant’s statement “only…as evidence of whether the statement was made”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Section 30 - What is improperly obtained evidence?

A
  • Evidence obtained:
    1. In consequences of a breach of any enactment or rule of law by a person to whom section 3 of the NZ BORA 1990 applies.
    2. In consequence of a statement made by a defendant that is or would be inadmissible if it were offered in evidence by the prosecution or
    3. unfairly.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Bill of Rights Act 1990 - Section 8: Right not to be deprived of life.

A

No one shall be deprived of life except on such grounds as are established by law and are consistent with the principles of fundamental justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Bill of Rights Act 1990 - Section 9: Right not to be subjected to torture or cruel treatment.

A

Blank - needs more useful information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Bill of Rights Act 1990 - Section 13: Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.

A

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and belief, including the right to adopt and to hold opinions without interference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Bill of Rights Act 1990 - Section 14: Freedom of expression

A

Everyone has the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and opinions of any kind in any form.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Bill of Rights Act 1990 - Section 15: Manifestation of religion and belief. What is the gist of this section?

A

Every person has the right to manifest that person’s religion or belief in worship, observance, practice, or teaching, either individually or in community with others, and either in public or in private.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

According to section 16 of the Bill of Rights Act 1990, what is an assembly?

A

Two or more people meeting with a common goal.

26
Q

Bill of Rights Act 1990 - Section 17: What does this section say about the freedom of association?

A

Everyone has the right to freedom of association.

27
Q

How might Police be at risk of curtailing a person’s right to freedom of movement (2 examples)?

A

Police actions in detaining and arresting people are generally covered by section 22 BORA relating to arbitrary arrest and detention. However, bail conditions, road closures, and other short-term curtailments may impinge on the right and must be reasonable.

28
Q

What does the Bill of Rights Act 1990 say in section 19 about freedom from discrimination?

A

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds of discrimination in the Human Rights Act 1993.
(2) Measures taken in good faith for the purpose of assisting or advancing persons or groups of persons disadvantaged because of discrimination that is unlawful by virtue of Part 2 of the Human Rights Act 1993 do not constitute discrimination.

29
Q

What does section 20 of the Bill of Rights Act 1990 say about the rights of minorities?

A

A person who belongs to an ethnic, religious, or linguistic minority in New Zealand shall not be denied the right, in community with other members of that minority, to enjoy the culture, profess and practise the religion, or to use the language, of that minority.

30
Q

Bill of Rights Act 1990 - Section 21: Unreasonable search and seizure.

A

Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure, whether of the person, property, or correspondence or otherwise.

31
Q

In which three situations might a person be regarded as ‘detained”?

A

1) There is physical deprivation of a person’s liberty
2) There are statutory restraints on a person’s movement
3) They have a reasonably held belief induced by police conduct (or other official conduct) that they are not free to leave

32
Q

Bill of Rights Act 1990 - Section 23: Rights of person arrested or detained. What are the 5 key parts to this section?

A

(1) Everyone who is arrested or who is detained under any enactment -
(a) Shall be informed at the time of the arrest or detention of the reason for it; and
(b) Shall have the right to consult and instruct a lawyer without delay and to be informed of that right; and
(c) Shall have the right to have the validity of the arrest or detention determined without delay by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the arrest or detention is not lawful.

(2) Everyone who is arrested for an offence has the right to be charged promptly or released.
(3) Everyone who is arrested for an offence and is not released shall be brought as soon as possible before a court or competent tribunal.

(4) Everyone who is -
(a) Arrested; or
(b) Detained under any enactment
for any offence or suspected offence shall have the right to refrain from making any statement and to be informed of that right.

(5) Everyone deprived of liberty shall be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the person.

33
Q

According to section 24 of the Bill of Rights Act 1990, everyone charged with an offence should be informed promptly and in detail of…

A

…the nature and cause of the charge.

34
Q

Blank

A

Blank

35
Q

Sec 202A (4) - What is the difference between paragraph A and paragraph B?

A

(a) Who, without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, has with him in any public place any knife or offensive weapon or disabling substance; or
(b) Who has in his possession in any place any offensive weapon or disabling substances in circumstances that prima facie show an intention to use it to commit an offence involving bodily injury or the threat or fear of violence.

36
Q

What was held in the case of the Attorney General v Reid with respect to arresting for breach of the peace?

A

There is no power to arrest for an anticipated breach of the peace. The proper procedure where a breach is anticipated and the persons concerned fail to desist is to arrest for obstruction.

37
Q

Complete the first rule associated with the BORA.

When you are investigating an offence and you locate suspects or other people you think may provide useful information, you may ask questions but…

A

…must not suggest that it is compulsory for the person to answer.

38
Q

What is a potential consequence of not cautioning some following arrest?

A

Failure to give the caution may result in a finding that evidence was improperly obtained and the evidence excluded under section 30 of the Evidence Act.

39
Q

What must you do when questioning a suspect about statements made by another person (challenge)?

A

You must ensure that the substance of the statements or the nature of the evidence is fairly explained.

40
Q

What was held in R v Mallinson with respect to ensuring that a person understands their rights?

A

“Unless there is an evidential basis justifying a contrary conclusion, proof that the Police advised the suspect of the section 23(1)(b) rights should lead to the inference that the suspect understood the position.”

41
Q

Who’s obligation is it to ensure that a person understands their rights?

A

The detainer.

42
Q

Can rights be provided in written form?

A

Yes. According to R v Grant, “There is nothing in the Act which requires that an arrested person be advised of his/her rights verbally rather than in writing.”

43
Q

What was held in R v Mallinson with respect to undue delay in rights/caution?

A

“The expression ‘without delay’ is not synonymous with ‘instantly’ or ‘immediately’…was the delay reasonable in all circumstances, having regard to the purpose of the right.”

44
Q

What is the Police Detention Legal Assistance Scheme?

A

“Police have a list of lawyers you may speak to for free.”

45
Q

What was held in Police v Curran with respect to accessing a lawyer?

A

In the case that a person wishes to speak to a later…“The detainer is required to refrain from attempting to gain evidence from the detainee until the detainee has had a reasonable opportunity to consult and instruct a lawyer.”

46
Q

Managing suspects - lawyers.

A

Probably need several cards here.

47
Q

What must police be careful not to do when a suspect has received advice to assert the right to silence?

A

The police must not take steps to “undermine the value of legal advice” that has been given.

48
Q

Do you have to let a suspect speak with a lawyer in private?

A

Yes. However, there are some situations in which the right to privacy may be overridden by other considerations such as when it would not be safe or because there is a risk the suspect will try to warn others or dispose of evidence.

Finally, privacy may not be necessary where the suspect has indicated that they do not require it.

49
Q

Do you have to provide the lawyer a suspect asks for?

A

You should attempt to contact the lawyer they have named, however, your attempts do not have to extend beyond what is a reasonable, honest, and determined effort.

50
Q

Does a detained person have the right to contact anyone?

A

No. They have the right to speak with a lawyer only.

51
Q

What was held in Police v Kohler with respect to waiving the right to having a lawyer?

A

“A valid waiver requires a conscious choice that is both informed and voluntary, and it cannot be implied from silence or failure to request rights.”

52
Q

What must police not do before a suspect speaks to a lawyer if they wish to do so?

A

You must not attempt to elicit evidence from that person until they have had a reasonable opportunity to consult a lawyer.

53
Q

If a suspect has been advised by their lawyer to remain silent, do you have to stop speaking to them?

A

No. There is no absolute prohibition on questioning a suspect who has received legal advice (to remain silent) but continues to answer questions.

54
Q

In determining whether there has been an informed and voluntary waiver of the rights earlier asserted, an evaluative approach is applied. What points are considered in the evaluative approach (5)?

A

1) Whether police take positive or deliberate steps to elicit incriminating evidence before consultation with a lawyer has taken place
2) Whether police have informed the suspect of their agreements with a lawyer before they waive their rights.
3) Whether police undermine the value of legal advice given
4) Suspects can waive their right following more information from police without further consultation with their lawyer
5) Whether incriminating statements made by a suspect and overheard by police were actively elicited

55
Q

Do you always have to give suspects the right to privacy to consult a lawyer?

A

Generally yes. However, in some circumstances, the right to privacy may be overridden by other considerations such as where it would not be safe to leave the accused alone because there was a risk that they would try to dispose of evidence and warn others.

56
Q

How hard do you have to try to find a phone number for a suspect’s lawyer?

A

You must make a reasonable, honest, and determined effort to contact a lawyer, however, police are under no obligation to find for the suspect their lawyer of choice when the contact number cannot be found.

57
Q

Does a right to phone a lawyer mean a right to phone anyone?

A

No. They may only call their lawyer or call someone for the purpose of obtaining a lawyer.

58
Q

Are police obligated to allow a suspect to call another lawyer if they are not satisfied with the legal advice initially given to them?

A

No.

59
Q

What is the right to Freedom of Expression limited by?

A

Criminal and civil law. For example, offensive and disorderly behaviour. The limit must be reasonable in the circumstances of the behaviour - an issue that will be decided by the court in each case.

60
Q

What must police be cognizant of when policing protests and demonstrations (3)?

A

1) The rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly
2) The extent to which the expression/demonstration is impinging on the rights of others to use the public space
3) Whether the behaviour warrants the intervention of the criminal law

61
Q

What should you consider before becoming involved with a protestor who has been asked to move on by an official at a government space?

A

Does the official’s reasoning make sense and does it justify police action, given an individual’s right to peaceful protest?