5 - Criminal behavior during adolescence: The role of peers (L5, Freelin, Engel) Flashcards

1
Q

What are some biological changes in adolescence? (HC)

A

Changes in:
- Physical strength
- Sexual maturity
- Limbic system (emotion regulation)
- Prefrontal cortex (judgement and decision making)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are some social changes in adolescence? (HC)

A
  • Movement from family to peers
  • Educational transitions
  • Work life
  • Romantic relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are four social learning mechanisms that can explain CB? (HC)

A
  1. Differential reinforcement: voluntary behaviors leads to subsequent consequences, which reinforces behavior
  2. Imitation: observation and reproduction
  3. Definitions: evaluation of approval/disapproval behavior
  4. Differential association: frequency, durationg and priority of association and interaction with individuals who hold both pro crime and anti crime beliefs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can you distinguish socialization and opportunity? (HC)

A
  • Social influence relates to peer relations/interactions that transmit delinquent norms. Includes learned norms and behavior, and pressures to conform.
  • Opportunity: peer relations/interactions structure everyday activities and determine opportunities, e.g. time spent outside the home
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are two ways of peer effects? (HC)

A
  • Peer influence -> deviance (causal effect)
  • Deviance -> peer selection (selection effect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do peer group effects see crime? (HC)

A

As collective behavior. They do this because of ridicule, loyalty and status.
- Diffuse the moral responsibility
- Group leaders get blame
- Groups create ‘moral world’ of their own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are protective effects of bonds and peer influences? (HC)

A

Protective effect is bonds to prosocial others.
- Most typical assumption for social bonds
- Mechanisms: e.g. attachment, indirect control
o i.e. stronger/more social bondsless delinquency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are negative effects of bonds and peer influences? (HC)

A

hanging out with people who do bad things can influence you to do the same. This happens through different social and learning processes, making you more likely to engage in delinquency when surrounded by delinquent peers. such as being encouraged to do bad things (reinforcement), copying what others do (imitation), or feeling pressure to fit in by doing the same things as others (conformity).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the routine activity theory posits? (HC)

A

We must consider characteristics of activities: types of activity, whether socializing is structured or unstructured.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are three elements of unstructured socializing? (HC)

A
  1. Presence of peers
  2. Absence of authority figures
  3. Lack of structure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where does the effect of unstructured socializing depends on? (HC)

A

Who is in the group and how they perceive opportunties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is important for peer networks? (HC)

A
  • Structure and composition matter: the strength of weak ties and the balance of anti/prosocial behaviors.
  • Where and what is done: this involves parental monitoring/control, guardianship and structured vs unstructured.
  • Environmental factors: opportunities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are examples of shock interventions? (HC)

A
  • Scared straight: visits to prison. Prisoners share life stories, graphic stories about life in prison to scare youth
  • Bootcamps: alt to prison, or camp within prison. Discipline and create respect for authority. They hope rational choice and self control will improve.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the intervention DARE? (HC)

A

Drug Abuse Resistance Education. Expected to work through peer processes and rational choice. Only small positive short term effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are examples of gang interventions? (HC)

A
  • Deviancy training: bring peers together, can reinforce antisocial attitudes (e.g. recreational interventions)
  • Gang cohesion: streetworkers inadvertently strengthen identity, glorify gang life, reduce cooperation w/police
  • Reactance: threatening severe consequences ‘backfire’, lead to defiance/opposition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are implications about though or shock interventions? (HC)

A

They can backfire. Can lead to psychological harm.

17
Q

What is the article of Freelin about?

A

Whether changing schools during transition from 8th to 9th grade influences adolescent delinquency.

18
Q

What does school transitions influence? (Freelin)

A

Academic outcomes, social lives

19
Q

What does life course criminology suggests? (Freelin)

A

Important life transitions (marry, parental incarceration, joining a gang) shape individuals participation in crime. School transition is also crucial life event.

20
Q

What does school transition affect in an individuals’ delinquency? (Freelin)

A
  1. School transition -> deminishes school bonds, introduces youth to delinquent peers -> more opportunities for CB. Those are prominent criminological theories.
  2. School transition -> leads to stronger connections to school, severed ties with delinquent peers -> reduced opportunities for antisocial behavior.
21
Q

How do normative, age-graded transitions influence varying offending patterns across different stages of life according to life course perspectives? (Freelin)

A

as people go through different life stages and experiences, their choices and identity shifts can lead to changes in criminal behavior. Life course perspectives study predictable life transitions, impacting CB. Offending patterns change due to these transitions, influenced by personal choices and triggering shifts in thinking and identity, shaping future behavior.

22
Q

Which children have a greater likelihood of arrest during adulthood? (Freelin)

A

Children with higher levels of non-normative school mobility between kindergarten and 12th grade (VS. children with fewer unanticipated school moves).

23
Q

On which three theories does the article of Freelin focusses on?

A
  1. Social control (Hirschi)
  2. Differential association (Sutherland)
  3. Routine activities (Cohen & Felson)
24
Q

What is the social control theory of Hirschi? (Freelin)

A

People avoid bad behavior because they have reasons to be good, like family or job commitments, which make crime not worth it. Crime happens when it seems like the easiest way to satisfy selfish desires, but having positive relationships, being part of regular activities, and believing in shared values stop people from committing crimes.

25
Q

In what way do Sampson & Laub incorporate the social control theory into a life-course perspective? (Freelin)

A

as people grow older, the things that influence their behavior change. Thru age-graded theory of informal social control. The individuals and social institutions vary with age, shifting from parents in childhood, to school and peers in adolescence, and to marriage and work in adulthood.

26
Q

What is the differential association theory of Sutherland? (Freelin)

A

People are born as blank slates and can learn to commit crime the same way that they learn any other behavior: through intimate social interactions with peers. They choose to follow/break the law.

27
Q

What is the routine activities theory of Cohen & Felson (Freelin)

A

Focuses on the role of situational factors in shaping crime. CB occurs when: motivated offender, suiable target and absence of a capable guardian.

28
Q

Definition Normative moves (Freelin)

A

Anticipated school transitions associated with graduating to a higher grade level.

29
Q

Definition Multifeeder transitions (Freelin)

A

Students merge from multiple middle schools into one high school.

30
Q

Definition Single feeder transitions (Freelin)

A

Students move from a single middels school together to one high school.

31
Q

What are three factors that change in school transitions whereas its possible that behavior changes in problem behavior? (Freelin)

A
  1. Social bonds
  2. Delinquent peers
  3. Unstructured socializing
32
Q

Are the three factors (social bonds, delinquent peers and unstructured socializing) all significant mediators? (Freelin)

A

Average peer delinquency and unstructured socializing are significant mediators in relationship between transition and delinquency and school bonding is not.

33
Q

What does the article of Engel is about?

A

It documents the peer effect on the decision to commit a crime.

34
Q

In what way do peers have influence on crime? (Engel)

A

Property crime, violent offending, substance abuse and druk driving. Peers have effect on the decision to commit a crime on multiple levels.

35
Q

What is the core idea of differential association theory? (Engel)

A

if someone is surrounded by friends who think breaking the law is okay (favorable definitions), they’re more likely to become delinquent because these views outweigh the ones discouraging criminal actions. Peers may create an ‘alternative morel culture’. It argues that a person becomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions favorable to violation of law over defintions unfavorable to violention of law.

36
Q

What is the social learning theory (Engel)

A

Individuals may e.g. learn from their peers to tolerate greater risk of punishment.

37
Q

Why does social information increase the incidence of crime and deviance? (Engel)

A
  • Individuals tend to particularly dislike if others are better off, with no compelling justification.
  • Not want to be the sucker in the situation -> motivates violency
  • Peers may serve as role models -> peers violate rules -> individual follows