2 - Developmental and life course theories (L2, Moffitt, Laub & Sampson) Flashcards

1
Q

There are two facts about antisocial behavior that the dual taxonomy presents. What are these two facts? (Moffitt)

A
  • It shows impressive continuity over age;
  • Its prevalence changes dramatically over age, increasing almost 10-fold temporarily during adolescence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the dual taxonomy theory? (Moffitt)

A

Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy proposes that antisocial acts are committed by two very different ‘groups’ of people: A ‘life-course persistent’ group whose antisocial behavior onsets early in life and who become life-long offenders versus a larger ‘adolescence-limited’ group who offend during their teenage years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why did previous antisocial classification schemes failed? (Moffitt)

A

Because they offered relatively little in the way of etiological or predictive validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the theory about dual taxonomy need to say about delinquents whose criminal activity is confined to the adolescent years? (Moffitt)

A

The causal factors may be proximal, specific to the period of adolescent development, and the theory must account for the discontinuity in their lives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the theory about dual taxonomy need to say about persons whose adolescent delinquency is merely one inflection in a continuous lifelong antisocial course? (Moffitt)

A

The theory must locate its causal factors early in their childhoods and must explain the continuity in their troubled lives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which is correct (Moffitt):
1. Does adolescence bring an increment in the number of people who are willing to offend?
2. Does the small and constant number of offenders simply generate more criminal acts while they are adolescent?

A

1: Empirical evaluations now suggest that the first explanation is correct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the best predictor of long term recidivistic offending? (Moffitt)

A

Early arrest is important.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does stability of antisocial behavior implies extremity? (Moffitt)

A

Yes, but extremity does not imply stability. The stability of antisocial behavior is closely linked to its extremity. The extreme frequency of crime committed by a very few males is impressive; it has been shown that the most persistent 5-6% of offenders are responsible for about 50% of known crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the two hypothetical types of antisocial youth? (Moffitt)

A
  1. Life-course-persistent type
  2. Adolescence-limited type
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does life-course-persistent antisocial persons show across the life course? (Moffitt)

A

Exhibit changing manifestations of antisocial behavior: the underlying dispositions remains the same, but expression changes form as new social opportunities arise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is heterotypic continuity? (Moffitt)

A

it suggests that there is a common factor or attribute that leads to different kinds of actions or behaviors that we can see. Continuity of an inferred trait that is presumed to underlie diverse phenotypic behaviors. ????

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Where do you look at in research if individuals’ antisocial behavior is stable? (Moffitt)

A

Roots early in life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a possible source of neuropsychological variation that is linked to problem behavior? (Moffitt)

A

Disruption in the ontogenesis (= de ontwikkeling die elk individueel mens doormaakt van eicel tot in de volwassenheid en verder) of the fetal brain. Also child abuse and neglect -> brain injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are two sorts of neuropsychological deficits associated with antisocial behavior? (Moffitt)

A
  1. Verbal deficits: these deficits of antisocial children are pervasive, affecting receptive listening and reading, problem solving, writing and memory.
  2. Executive deficits: these deficits produce learning disabilities, including symptoms such as inattention and impulsivity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is important to look for in children with cognitive and temperamental disadvantages? (Moffitt)

A

They are generally not born into supportive environments. And parents of children who are at risk for antisocial behavior often provide their children with criminogenic enviroments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What form of interaction plays a important role in promoting antisocial behavior and maintaining its continuity? (Moffitt)

A

Evocative interaction. This occurs when a child’s behavior evokes distinctive responses from others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What can a toddler’s problem behavior affect? (Moffitt)

A
  • Parent’s disciplinary strategies
  • Interactions with adults and peers at an older age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are two additional types of interaction that may help explain how the LCP behavior might promote its own continuity and pervasiveness? (Moffitt)

A
  • Reactive interaction: this occurs when different youngsters exposed to the same environment experience it, interpret it, and react to it in accordance with their particular style
  • Proactive interaction: occurs when people select or create environments that support their styles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

The three types of person-enviroment interactions (evocative, reactive, proactive) can produce two kinds of consequences in the life course. Which two? (Moffitt)

A
  1. Cumulative consequences: early individual differences may set in motion a downhill snowball of cumulative continuties
  2. Contemporary consequences: this happens if the LCP person continues to carry into adulthood the same underlying consellation of traits that got him into trouble as a child (e.g. poor selfcontrol)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Vul in (Moffitt). In this theory of life-course-persistent antisocial behavior neither …(1) nor …(2) account for continuity.

A

1: traits
2: environments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

The life-course-persistent antisocial syndrome that suggest psychopathology. What are aspects of this syndrome? (Moffitt)

A
  • The syndrome is statistically unusual; it affects about 5% of males.
  • The syndrome is characterized by stability across time and in diverse circumstances. This high-probability response style is relied on even in situations where it is clearly inappropriate or disadvantageous.
  • The syndrome has a biological basis in subtle dysfunctions of the nervous system.
  • The syndrome is associated with other mental disorders (comorbid).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the hallmark of teenage delinquents (adolescent-limited delinquents) who have no notable history of antisocial behavior in childhood and little future for such behavior in adulthood? (Moffitt)

A

Discontinuity in adolescence-limited delinquents.
- May have crime free periods
- Lack consistency in antisocial behavior across situations
This type shows temporal instability and cross-situational inconsistency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Why do adolescent-limited delinquents begin delinquency? (Moffitt)

A

Their delinquency is social mimicry of antisocial style of life-course-persistent youths. The resource is mature status, with its consequent power and privilege.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is an explanation why boys will mimic life-course persistent boys? (Moffitt)

A

The maturity gap. They want to function more alike to their social age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Why is personal independence a reinforcer of delinquent involvement by adolescent-limited? (Moffitt)

A

Every crime is a statement of personal independence. They want to prove that they can act independently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Why doenst every teenager become delinquent? (Moffitt)

A

Not much research.
- They may not sense the maturity gap, and lack the motivation for experimenting.
- They may lack structural opportunities for modeling antisocial peers.
- School and neighborhood structures may constrain or facilitate access to life-course-persistent models.

27
Q

How can personal traits contribute to the exclusion of mimic antisocial peers? (Moffitt)

A

They can have certain personal traits what makes them unattractive to other teens.

28
Q

Why do adolescence-limited delinquents not maintain their delinquent behavior into childhood? (Moffitt)

A

They desist from crime because healthy youths respond adaptively to changing contingencies.
- They experience a loss of motivation for delinquency as they exit the maturity gap
- Consequences of illegal behavior shifts more toward punishment instead of reward in their perception

29
Q

What are three kinds of theoretical frameworks to explain CB (HC)

A

Static, dynamic and typological.

30
Q

What is a static theory? (HC)

A

Static theories hold that behavior emerges in a predictable sequence and unfolds at roughly the same age for all individuals.static theories believe that people generally go through the same stages of development in a predictable way, regardless of who they are.

31
Q

What is an example of a static theory? (HC)

A

General theory of crime (of low self-control) Gottfredson & Hirschi. this theory suggests that people with poor impulse control, often rooted in their upbringing, are more likely to commit crimes.
- Selfcontrol is invariant and rank-stable;
- Low self control expresses in impulsive, insensitive, physical, risk-taking, short-sighted (the lower self control, the more likely you commit crime)
- Selfcontrol develops in early childhood through parental socialization

32
Q

What are critiques of the general theory of crime (of low self control) of Gottfriedson & Hirschi? (HC)

A
  • It only explains small amounts of variation;
  • that self-control changes over time;
  • same individual differs in criminal behavior depending on social location;
  • opportunity (social context, stages of life course) matters.
33
Q

What is a dynamic theory? (HC)

A

highlight that people vary in their development, events can shape how someone grows, and the impact of events can depend on a person’s age. Look at development heterogenity that suggests that events/actions have causal effects, there are age-grade effects (depends on age) and there are within-individual differences.

34
Q

Defintion Cumulative continuity and what theory matches to this (HC)

A

E.g. Prior criminal behavior increases likelihood of future CB (snowball effect). Dynamic theory.

35
Q

Defintion Self-selection and what theory matches to this (HC)

A

People select experiences/groups based on internal traits, i.e. similar people ‘end up together’. No causal relationship, just internal dispositions. Static theory.

36
Q

What are typological theories? (HC)

A

Combination of statis and dynamic. Suggest that because there are different types of offenders, we must look at different types of mechanisms/relations. Different types of offenders, causes and mechanisms and predictions for behavior.

37
Q

What is a chronic offender? (HC)

A

They account for a large proportion of crime. Thus small % that commits large %opf crime.

38
Q

What are characteristics of chronic offenders? (HC)

A
  • Early onset: before adolescence
  • Behavioral problems: school, parents, peers
  • Social problems
  • Difficult children (developmental psychology)
39
Q

What are characteristics of LCP? (HC)

A
  • Continuity in antisocial behavior in all domains (school, home, peers, etc.)
  • More serious offences
  • Early onset (before adolescence, even before birth)
    Must look for causes in early life! More likely to have neuropsychological dysfunctions what leads to poor childhood socialization, which can cause cumulative continuity.
40
Q

What are characteristics of ALs? (HC)

A
  • They have no prior behavioral problems
  • They commit minor offences
  • Their criminal career is inconsistent, sporadic: spontaneous
  • There is great desistence by mid-20s
    Look for explanations in adolescence. Can be explained by maturity gap. Will mimic life-course-persistent
41
Q

Definition Snares (HC)

A

consequences of antisocial behavior, e.g. drinking, smoking, car accident, kicked out of school.

42
Q

What does the continuity and change theory states? (HC)

A

Continuity:
- Childhood behavior is good predictor for adult behavior
- Early behavior can affect future opportunities
- Look in childhood for predictors

Change:
- Not all delinquent kids become criminal adults
- All desist with age: everyone stops
- We must account for adult roles/traits

43
Q

What is the Glueck study? (HC)

A

Measured many factors in delinquents and non-delinquent boys. Looked also for parent-reported characteristics and behavior and teacher-reported variables.

44
Q

What happend with the Glueck study? (HC)

A

Sampson & Laub rediscovered the data and developed age-graded theory of informal social control; presence and quality of bonds can inhibit criminal behavior. Dynamic theory!

45
Q

Which two controls do you have with the age graded theory of informal social control of Sampson & Laub? (HC)

A

Informal controls: parents, peers, work, school, partners, communicty (when you commit crime, the more likely you lose those partners)
Formal controls: police, teachers

46
Q

What is the assumption of Social bond theories/control theories? (HC)

A

That all of us possess the hedonistic (engaged in the pursuit of pleasure) drive to act in self-interest. Social bonds put constraints on CB, due to:
- Attachment, commitment, involvement, beliefs
Strong bonds discourage (control) CB: family, school, work etc.

47
Q

Continuity/change is determined by… (HC)

A

social bonds and controls (attachment, supervision, discipline)
routine activities (where you are, what opportunities may come up)
human agency

48
Q

What is a point of critique of Moffitts theory? (HC)

A

There might be more variability in offending/desistance over time. LCPs do not desist. There might be more than two groups.

49
Q

What are critiques on the theory of Sampson & Laub age graded theory of informal social control? (HC)

A
  • Its not clear what the causal order is
  • Its not clear what actually the role of social bonds is versus the role of opportunities
  • Does everyone really desist?
50
Q

Describe the onset, mechanism and if it changes or not for: Adolescence limited (Moffitt; WG)

A

Onset: Start of adolescence, above 15
Mechanism: Maturity gap, Mimic LCP’s, Gaining status trough crime
Change or not: Yes, because the maturity gap disappears as they get older. So they have more alternative opportunities. Crime will no longer feel as a reward but more as a punishment

51
Q

Describe the onset, mechanism and if it changes or not for: Life-course-persistent (Moffitt; WG)

A

Onset: Early in childhood
Mechanism: Neuropsychological dysfunctions (e.g. temper, impulsivity), Environment (ND and this influences each other, e.g. ill equipped parents)
Change or not: No, they won’t change; they don’t stop committing crimes. But they will commit more heavy crimes. Because of the contemporary continuity and the cumulative continuity

52
Q

Describe the onset, mechanism and if it changes or not for: Informal social control (Sampson & Laub; WG)

A

Onset: Not specified, you can start at any age
Mechanism: Social bonds (influences each other), Self-selection (e.g. low self-control) certain characteristics can lead to more crime
Change or not: They change around turning points. It is not a one day change, it happens over time and it will change the behavior (e.g. marriage). Can also be negative; eg getting into a fight

53
Q

What do Laub & Sampson highlight in their study?

A

The distinction between self-selection and cumulative continuity. They explicate the relevance of the adult life course and various meanings of change. self-selection and cumulative continuity explain how our choices and experiences shape our lives over time, and these concepts are crucial for understanding the changes and patterns in our adult lives.

54
Q

What is the main thesis of Sampson & Laub?

A

Social capital and turning points are important concepts in understanding processes of change in the adult life course.

55
Q

What do Laub & Sampson emphasize in their study?

A

The rol of age-graded, informal social control as reflected in the structure of interpersonal bonds linking members of society to one another and to wider social institutions

56
Q

What can counteract the trajectories of early child development? (S&L)

A

Salient life events and social ties in adulthood. They emphasize the quality or strength of social ties more than the occurrence or timing of discrete life events.

57
Q

Summarized, what is S&L’s theory about?

A

Summarized, Laub and Sampson’s theory attempts to unite continuity and change within the context of sociological understanding of crime in the life course.
* In their theory, turning points can modify life trajectories (redirect paths), despite the connection between childhood events and experiences in adulthood.

58
Q

Where do S&L have doubts about?

A

Self-selection hypothesis.
- Partially supported in Glueck study: adolescent delinquents and nondelinquents displayed significant behavioral consistency into adulthood

59
Q

What is a methodological implication with the self selection hypothesis? (S&L)

A

The correlations among adult behavior should disappear once controls are introduced for prior individual-level differences in criminal propensity or low self control.

60
Q

What is cumulative continuity (S&L)

A

This means that delinquent behavior creates problems for young people, making their future harder. It affects their opportunities and puts them in difficult situations, especially if they are stigmatized or end up in institutions.

61
Q

Why is focus on stability insufficient for understanding crime in adult life course? (S&L)

A
  1. Stability of antisocial behavior is far from perfect
  2. When we measure how similar or consistent people’s behavior is over time, we often look at the overall patterns of differences between individuals. These measurements rely on seeing how people’s relative positions or rankings stay consistent over time.
62
Q

Why are adult social ties important? (S&L)

A

This means that these systems make it difficult for people to act on their criminal tendencies because there are rules and restrictions in place that stop them. These rules create obligations and consequences that discourage criminal behavior.

63
Q

Vul in (S&L). Integrating divergent sources of life-history data, our qualitative analysis was consistent with the hypothesis that the major turning points in the life course for men that refrained from crime and deviance in adulthood were …(1)and …(2)

A

employment
good marriage

64
Q

What is important to understand the change process? (S&L)

A

Objective and subjective contingencies