5

Question 1

Who proposed the theory of Maternal Deprivation?

Answer 1

Bowlby

Question 2

Define maternal deprivation

Answer 2

Child and caregiver (mother) are separated and their attachment bond is disrupted, which is believed to negatively affect the child’s intellectual and emotional development

Question 3

Outline how maternal deprivation occurs

Answer 3

• Child and caregiver separated for extended period

- Child becomes deprived of emotional care

Question 4

Can deprivation sometimes occur without separation?

Answer 4

Yes - sometimes poor care from a present caregiver can also lead to a deprivation of emotional care

Question 5

When did Bowlby believe that children were vulnerable to maternal deprivation?

Answer 5

Critical period of first 2.5 yrs (with lesser risk continuing up to 5yrs)

Question 6

Did Bowlby believe that maternal deprivation has negative consequences?

Answer 6

Yes - thought to negatively affect intellectual and emotional development

Question 7

What intellectual effect did Bowlby suggest maternal deprivation can have?

Answer 7

Delayed intellectual development : shown in low IQ

Question 8

Give a piece of research evidence to support the idea that maternal deprivation negatively effects intellectual development

Answer 8

Goldfarb (1947)
Aim:
- To investigate whether the Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis is correct in suggesting childhood separations can impair intellectual development
Procedure:
- Sample: wartime orphans
- Group 1: first few months in orphanage, then fostered
Group 2: first 3 yrs in orphanage, then fostered
Findings:
- Lower IQ in those who remained in institutions for longer
Conclusion:
- Maternal deprivation can stunt intellectual development, evident in low IQs

Question 9

What emotional effect did Bowlby suggest maternal deprivation can have?

Answer 9

Impaired emotional development, which may lead to the development of disorders, e.g. AFFECTIONLESS PSYCHOPATHY

Question 10

Define affectionless psychopathy

Answer 10

Inability to experience guilt or strong emotions towards others

Question 11

What type of people commonly have affectionless psychopathy?

Answer 11

Criminals - can complete crimes with no remorse

Question 12

Give a piece of research evidence to support the idea that maternal deprivation negatively effects emotional development

Answer 12

Bowlby’s 44 Juvenile Thieves Study (1944)
Aim:
- To investigate whether the Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis is correct in suggesting childhood separations can impair emotional development and trigger disorders
Procedure:
- Sample = 88 children, age 5-16, attend guidance clinic
- Group 1: Experimental group. 44 children referred for theft
Group 2: Control group. 44 children referred for other reasons
- Interviewed ppts + families to determine: type of upbringing (deprived?) and whether ppts were affectionless psychopaths
Findings:
- Group 1: Higher level of separation from mothers in childhood (86%) and higher level of affectionless psychopaths (32%)
- Group 2: Lower level of separation from mothers in childhood (4%) and no affectionless psychopaths
Conclusion:
- Early life separations can cause maternal deprivation, which can have negative effect on emotional development + cause disorders

Question 13

Give 2 positive evaluation points for Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Theory

Answer 13

Research support

• Concept of damaged intellectual development supported by Goldfarb
• Concept of damaged emotional development support by Bowlby
• This research support increases the theory’s validity

Practical applications

• Theory has highlighted important considerations for childcare, that can reduce deprivation
• E.g. ‘Attachment + Family Centred Care Programme’ encourages parents to remain in contact and routine with hospitalised children, so attachment isn’t lost and child isn’t emotionally deprived

Question 14

Give 3 negative evaluation points for Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Theory

Answer 14

Research to refute

• Hilda Lewis (1954) replicated the 44 thieves study using 500 young people
• Didn’t find any link between early separation (deprivation) + criminality or affectionless psychopathy
• Suggests Bowlby was wrong, maternal deprivation doesn’t hinder emotional development

Methodological issues with supporting research
Bowlby:
- May have had observer bias + interviewer bias (particularly as he was a deprived child)
- Didn’t observe any other variables (e.g. poverty) that linked to delinquency, so may have ignored third intervening variable - reductionist
Goldfarb:
- Confounding variables, as all children in wartime orphanages had varying levels of trauma, so intellectual development may be result of this, not of deprivation

Alternative explanation

• Effects of deprivation may actually be effects of privation
• Goldfarb’s orphans + Bowlby’s thieves suffered separation at a such a young age that they may never have formed attachments
• The lack of development may be due to the ppts suffering privation

Question 15

Define privation

Answer 15

Child-caregiver attachment is never formed

Question 16

What is the difference between deprivation and privation?

Answer 16

• Deprivation is removal of an attachment

- Privation is never forming an attachment

Question 17

Who pointed out that those raised in institutional care may never form attachments, so always suffer from privation not deprivation?

Answer 17

Rutter (1981)

Question 18

Why were orphan studies initially used?

Answer 18

• To see affects of maternal deprivation on intellectual + emotional development
• Over time became clear that these studies were actually a measure of the affects of privation, as attachments didnt have time to form

Question 19

Define institutionalisation

Answer 19

Effects of living in an institution (e.g. hospital, orphanage) where emotional care is limited

Question 20

Why are institutionalised children studied?

Answer 20

To see the effects of maternal deprivation/privation

Question 21

What country provided a great opportunity to analyse institutionalised children?

Answer 21

Romania

Question 22

Outline the orphan issue in Romania

Answer 22

1960s - President Ceausescu banned contraception + abortion until women had 5 children in hope to boost population

Many Romanian children placed in institutions (orphanages) as parents couldn’t afford to care for them

1989 onwards - Romanian Revolution ended oppressive period + many existing orphans were adopted, including by British parents

Question 23

How did the orphan issue in Romania provide a psychological opportunity?

Answer 23

Psychologists (e.g. Rutter + Zeanah) were able to do research into the impacts of institutionalisation and the maternal deprivation/privation that it causes, in NATURAL EXPERIMENTS

Question 24

What type of research did Rutter do + when?

Answer 24

• Longitudinal study

- 1998 onwards

Question 25

What type of research did Zeanah do + when?

Answer 25

- One off controlled observation + interview | - 2005

Question 26

Outline Rutter et al’s research

Answer 26

Aim: To investigate whether the negative effects of maternal deprivation/privation from institutionalisation were long term or could be overcome by good care Procedure: - 165 Romanian orphans tracked longitudinally (in 3 age categories: under 6 months, 6 months-2yrs, over 2yrs) - Intellectual + emotional development assessed at age 4,6,11,15,22-25 - Control group of 52 UK children adopted at similar time, assessed too Findings: - When first adopted, all showed lack of emotional + intellectual development - Recovery rate depended on age of adoption (earlier adoption - better) - Intellectually, in age 6 assessment, found higher IQ when adopted earlier Adopted before 6 months: 102 Adopted 6 months-2yrs: 86 Adopted over 2 yrs: 77 - Emotionally, in age 11 assessment, found more regular attachment type when adopted earlier Adopted before 6 months: More regular Adopted after 6 months: Many had disinhibited attachment

Question 27

What is disinhibited attachment?

Answer 27

Children don’t form secure attachments - Equal affection to strangers + caregivers - Behaviour appears clingy + attention seeking, even to strangers

Question 28

Outline Zeanah et al’s research

Answer 28

Aim: To investigate whether maternal deprivation/privation from institutionalisation affects attachment type Procedure: - 95 Romanian orphans aged 12-31 months who had spent most of life in institutions - Assessed attachment type by... Controlled observation in form of the Strange Situation Procedure Interviewing caregiver about unusual behaviours associated with irregular, disinhibited attachment (e.g. clinginess) - Control group of 50 children, never in institutions assessed too Findings: - Experimental group: Low secure attachment (19%) High disinhibited attachment (44%) - Control group: High secure attachment (74%) Low disinhibited attachment (less than 20%)

Question 29

What were the overall conclusions of the Romanian orphan studies (Rutter + Zeanah)?

Answer 29

- Institutionalisation can cause maternal deprivation/privation + the associated negative effects on development - Emotional issues that can occur include: disinhibited attachment - as children adapt to living with multiple caregivers - Intellectual issues that can occur include: intellectual disability - Supports sensitive period - those institutionalised at a young age CAN have long lasting issues, but they do have a chance of recovery, with best recovery seen in those adopted at an early age

Question 30

Why does disinhibited attachment type develop?

Answer 30

Believed to be associated with being raised with multiple caregivers (no primary caregiver), so learn to show everyone equal affection

Question 31

Give 3 positive evaluation points for the Romanian orphan studies

Answer 31

Methodology - Higher internal validity than previous orphan studies (e.g. Goldfarb) - All Romanian orphans had similar background due to national situation in Romania - Greater focus on measuring institutionalisation, with fewer impacts of confounding variables (e.g. affects of previous trauma) Practical applications - Understanding institutionalisation + how it can cause damaging deprivation/privation allows avoidance of negative affects - E.g. More efforts to place orphans in foster care (less issues with institutionalisation, can get emotional care + attachments) - E.g. Existing institutions have made effort to reduce negative effects - each child has 1-2 ‘key workers’ to reduce disinhibited attachment Ethical issues - Experiments are natural (As IV of institutionalisation is naturally occurring) - Allows assessment of deprivation + privation without putting ppts at additional risk (utilising negative situation)

Question 32

Give 3 negative evaluation points for the Romanian orphan studies

Answer 32

Methodology - Romanian orphanages may have been so extreme in lacking emotional care that institutionalisation issues are exaggerated - Findings may not be generalisable, as other institutions may be better Methodology of Rutter - Used longitudinal study - Study unfinished (adult data may provide diff results currently unknown) - Some data may be lost by ppt attrition Issue of social sensitivity - Findings suggest lack of development in Romanian orphans - Published during orphans’ lifetime - Ppts’ lives may be affected, so maybe shouldn’t have been published so soon - E.g. Discrimination (low intellectual expectations if applying for job) or Preferential Treatment (people feel bad so are biased towards them)