44 Statistics and Patient Safety Flashcards

1
Q

type 1 error

A

rejects the null hypothesis incorrently, falsely assumed there was a difference when no difference actually exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

type 2 error

A

accets null hypothesis incorrectly, 2/2 small sample size, tx are interpreted as equal when there is actually a difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

null hypothesis

A

hypothesis that no difference exists between groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

p value

A

convention is <0.05 rejects the null hypothesis … mean 95% likelihood that the difference between the populations is true … <5% likelihood that the difference is not true and occurred by chance alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

variance

A

spread of data around a mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

parameter

A

population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

mode

A

most common value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

mean

A

average

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

meadian

A

middle value, 50th percentile

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

trials and studies: list types

A

RCT, double-blind controlled trial, cohort study, case-control study (retro), meta-analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

randomized controlled trial

A

prospective study with random assignment to treatment and non-tx groups, avoid treatment biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

double-blind controlled trial

A

prospective study in which patient and doctor are blind to treatment, avoids observational biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

cohort study

A

prospective study - compares disease rate between exposued and unexposed groups (random assignment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

case-control study

A

retrospective study in which those who have the disease are compared with a similar population who do not have the disease, the frequency of the suspected risk factor is then compared between the 2 groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

meta-analysis

A

combines data from different studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

list quantitative vs qualitative variables

A

quant = student’s t test, paired t test, ANOVA … qual = nonparametric statistics, chi-squared, kaplan-meyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

student’s t test

A

2 independent groups, variable is quantitative - compares means

18
Q

paired t test

A

variable is quantitative, beore and after studies (i.e. weight before and after drug vs placebo)

19
Q

ANOVA

A

compares quant variables (means) for more than 2 groups

20
Q

non-parametric stats

A

compare categorical (qualitative) variable (i.e. race, sex, medical problems and diseases, meds)

21
Q

chi-squared test

A

compares 2 groups with categorical (qualitative) variables - i.e. number of obese patients with and without DM versus nonobese pts with and without DM

22
Q

Kaplan-Meyer test

A

small groups, estimates survival

23
Q

relative risk

A

incidence in exposed / incidence in unexposed

24
Q

power of test

A

probability of making the correct conclusion = 1 - prob of type 2 error (accepts null incorrectly) … likelihood that the conclusion of the test is true … larger sample size increases power of test

25
prevalence
number of people with disease in a population (i.e. number of pts in US with colon CA), long-standing disease increases prevalence
26
incidence
number of new cases diagnosed over a certain time frame in a population (i.e. number of pts in US newly diagnosed with colon CA in 2003)
27
TP, TN, FP, FN 2x2 table
L: disease present and absent .... top: test positive and negative
28
sensitivity
ability to detect disease = TP / (TP + FN) ... note denominator is the actual number of pts in the population with the disease ... indicates the number of people who have the disease who test positive .... with high sens, a negative test results mean pt is very unlikely to have the disease
29
specificity
ability to state no disease is present = TN / (TN + FP) ... note denominator is true number of pts in population without disease ... indicates the number of ppl who do not have the disease who test negative ... which high spec, a +test result means pt is very likely to have the disease
30
PPV
TP / (TP + FP) ... denom is all + tests ... likelihood that with a positive test, the patient actually has the disease
31
NPV
TN / (TN + FN) ... denom is all neg tests ... likelihood that with a negative test result, the pt does not have the disease
32
accuracy
(TP + TN) / (TP + TN + FP + FN) ... denom is whole population ... note denominator
33
predictive value
depends on disease prevalnce
34
sensitivity and specificity - relation to prevalnce
independent
35
goal of NSQIP
NSQIP = national surgical quality improvement program ... seeks to collect outcome data to measure and improve surgical quality in the US ... outcomes are reported as observed vs expected ratios
36
JCAHO prevention - use, protocol
aim to prevent wrong site, procedure, patient ... protocol = preop verification of patient and procedure, operative site and side (marking if L or R or multiple levels, must be visible after the pt is prepped) ... time out before incision is made (verify pt, procedure, position site and side, availability of implants or special requirements)
37
what promotes a culture of safey
confidential system of reporting errors, emphasis on learning over accountability, flexibility in adapting to new situations or problems
38
risk factors for retained object after surgery, MC object
MC retained sponge ... emergency surgery, unplanned change in procedure, obesity, towel used for closure
39
define sentinel event
defined by JCAHO - unexpected occurrence involving death or serious injury or the risk thereof --> hospital undergoes RCA to prevent and minimize future occurences (i.e. wrong site surgery)
40
GAP protection technique
gaps in care (i.e. change in caregiver, divisions of labor, shift changes, transfers) can lead to loss of information and error ... prevention = structured handoffs and checklists (face to face if possible), standardizing orders, reading back orders if verbal