4.2 - Class, Power & Crime (Marxism) Flashcards
How do Functionalist explain Class Differences in Crime?
> Due to inadequate socialisation e.g. Durkheim
> Miller - Focal Concerns
How does Strain Theory explain Class Differences in Crime
> e.g. Merton
How do Subcultural Theories explain Class Differences in Crime?
> e.g. Cohen Status frustration and Cloward and Ohlin - 3 subcultures
How does Labelling Theory explain Class Differences in Crime?
No act is deviant, labelling makes it so, working class people are more likely to be labelled.
General Marxist View on Crime
> Law mainly enforced selectively against the working class, and official statistics are flawed
> The Criminal Justice System serves upper class interests & the structure of capitalism explains crime.
Criminogenic Capitalism
Crime inevitable, as capitalism is criminogenic - it’s very nature causes crime, as it’s based on exploiting the working class for profit.
Why does working class crime occur due to Capitalism being criminogenic?
> Poverty means crime is only way the working class can survive
> Only way of getting consumer goods, promoted by advertising leading to utilitarian crimes e.g. theft
> Alienation causes frustration, leading non-utilitarian crimes e.g. violence
Why does upper class crime occur due to Capitalism being criminogenic?
Win at all costs mentality instilled, encourages greed profit, so do corporate crime e.g. tax evasion
Marxism - Class & Crime Key Sociologists
> Chambliss (Criminogenic Capitalism, State & Law Making)
> Gordon (Prevalence of Crime)
> Mankoff (Welfare State & Crime)
> Snider (State & Law Making)
> Reinan (Selective Enforcement)
> Pearce (Ideological Functions of Crime & Law)
> Althusser (Ideology)
Chambliss - Criminogenic Capitalism
> Crime’s universal & present in all social classes, due to focus on utilitarian gains
> Working class & upper class both used different means to get goods, working class have limited means of crime so use violence & thefts
> Upper class have more options e.g. white-collar crime e.g. fraud or corporate crime
Criticisms of Chambliss
Too deterministic, not all working class turn to crime, despite financial position
Gordon - Prevalence of Crime
> Crime is rational response to capitalism in a dog eat dog society - present in all classes
> Especially in US with lack of welfare, so working class have to do crime to survive
Mankoff (Welfare State & Crime)
> Lower levels of crime in the EU than US, as basic needs e.g. healthcare & food etc are met
> So feel protected by state & don’t do crime
Chambliss - State & Law Making
> Main purpose of law was to protect wealth from masses
> e.g. English law introduced in East Africa, but didn’t want to work for British
> Government made tax with punishment for non-payment, led to new workforce for plantation owners, so they can pay tax
Snider - State & Law Making
> State is reluctant to pass laws, regulating businesses e.g. profit is more important than people
> People who commit corporate crime are less likely to be prosecuted
How do the upper class create Laws?
> Connections with officials to pass laws, protecting private property
> Big companies use pressure groups to pass laws in their interests
> Ownership of the free press (newspapers), make working class activities seem deviant & in need of control
Examples of Laws in favour of the upper class
> Tax laws allows companies to avoid tax, with registered offices in tax havens
> Non-implementation for recommendations of Grenfell, due to costs for companies
Reinan - Selective Enforcement
> Powerless groups more likely to be criminalised, courts tend to ignore crimes of powerful
> e.g. Social Security Fraud by WC always prosecuted, but tax evasion of UC isn’t
Example of how Law is Selectively Enforced
> 47K knife crimes in UK vs 69K workplace accidents
Pearce - Ideological Functions of Crime & Law
> Laws appearing to benefit WC often benefit UC more
> e.g. health & safety laws, keeps workers fit 4 wrk, creates FCC.
Criticisms of Law Creation in favour of UC
> Laws created for harmonious running of society e.g. theft, violence etc.
> Consumer rights laws, protects our rights
Ideological Functions of Crime & Law
> State enforces law selectively due to OS crime appears a WC phenomenon, shifts attention from UC crime
> Divides WC encouraging workers to blame criminals for problems not capitalism
Althusser - Ideology
> Some reject ISA, so control & order thus needs to be maintained through RSA
> Police & Army use physical force to deal with those who rebel vs social order
> e.g. 2011 Riots & Police response to BLM, works in favour of UC
Criticisms of Althusser
Most reject ISA of UC, w/out rebelling to an extent that needs RSA to intervene
Marxism A03 - Key Sociologists
> Left Realists
Left Realists - Criticisms of Marxism
Marx focuses on crimes of powerful ignores most crimes v WC v WC e.g. theft
General Evaluation of Marxism
> Criminals become V, as unequal society is actually to blame
> Not all capitalist societies have + crime rates e.g. Japan less crime > US
3 ways NM agrees w/ Marx
> Capitalism based on exploitation & inequality, key to understanding crime
> State enforces laws for benefit of UC
> Favour classless society, where crimes greatly reduced
NM - Critical Criminology (KS)
> Taylor (Anti-Determinism & Crime as Voluntarist, FSTOD)
> Hall (FSTOD - Policing the Crisis)
Anti-Determinism (Taylor)
Reject idea workers do crime due to poverty as well as ext factors e.g. anomie & labelling
Crime as Voluntarist (Taylor)
> Criminals make conscious choice to do crime, to desperately change society
> Often w/ political motive eg. redistributing wealth & not puppets of capitalism.
A03 of Crime as Voluntarist (KS)
> Rock (Romantic)
Rock - Criticisms of Taylor
> Overly romantic view of criminals e.g ‘’robin hoods’’ fighting injustice, LR states most crimes by WC v WC
> Ignores effects on WC v’s
General Criticisms of Taylor
Crimes e.g. DV/Rape not politically motivated, RR state crime is opportunistic, not reaction to injustice
Aims of Taylor’s FSTOD
Comprehensive theory to change society for better
2 Sources of FSTOD
> Marx: Ideas on inequality & law enforcement
> Interactionism: Effects of labelling & societal reactions