4. Outcome Studies Flashcards
Cognitive dissonance (triad: debride, disinfec, obtur)
Seltzer/Bender
Success criteria: clin+Rg+histo
Seltzer/Bender
Healed, Healing, Diseased, Functional
Friedman
POOR PAST AM
Crump
Failure 60% prosth (crn fx), 30% perio, 10% endo
Vire
PARL decr. success by 10-25%
deChevigny/Friedman (93% vs 82% NSRCT)
Implant vs Endo
Iqbal/Kim NSD survival
Doyle same failure 6%, longer time to function.
Hannahan/Eleazer NSD survival, Implant greater intervention (12.4% vs 1.4%)
Healing time
Andreasen 1-4 yrs
Orstavik Peak heal year 1, up to 4
Histo vs Rg success
Brynolf 93% inflammation+ when PARL-
Walton 26% inflammation+ when PARL-
Outcome Studies
Healing Factors: PARL & size, fill length, apical prep, coronal restr, tth location.
Ng
Friedman
Prognostic factors - Culture
Peters, Wesselink - NSD
Sjogren - 94% vs 68%
Prognostic factors - PARL
deChevigny/Friedman (93% vs 82% NSRCT) decr 10-25%
Sjogren 1990: 96% vs 86%
Length of Fill
Sjogren - Short 0-2mm 94% vs long 76% vs too short 68%
Chugal 1-mm loss WL = 14% incr. failure
Schaeffer - meta-A 0-1 mm short > 1-3 mm short > beyond apex
Ng - fill within 2 mm
Swartz/Skidmore - Overfill 4x higher failure
visit - NSD
Ng, Figini, Sathorn (but greater pain)