4. DUAL MODELS OF JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING AND ALTERNATIVES II - GROUP DECISION MAKING & PERFORMANCE Flashcards
Benefits of being a part of a group: complex problems, better problem solvers than individuals:
- New and high risks problems, in which there is no clear action
- Demands on a diverse set of skills and competencies
- Confrontation between various diverging viewpoints
- Interaction, proposal, ideas, solutions
- Higher acceptance for decisions more motivated (your voice is heard/ can see it other way around)
Cost of being a part of a group:
- Take more time in making decision
- Individual responsibility may be diluted
- Higher risks are taken than if the decision were made individually
- Often there are compromises
- Potential for conflicts, negative interactions
Social Judgment Scheme (SJS) model (Davis, 1996):
- Member preferences weights are an exponential function of the distances between a given member’s preference and all other members’ preferences
o Members whose preferences are discrepant from one another receive smaller weights in the group decisions
o Members whose preferences are similar to one another receive larger weights in the group decisions
Group efficacy: Which factors facilitate group efficacy
- Leadership:
o positively with team performances
o Specific perspectives of leadership: transformational - Group Composition:
o Aggregated characteristics: cognitive ability
o Member heterogeneity
o Team size: depends on what to do (Fabric-Team) - Task Design:
o Task meaningfulness: collective performances
o Autonomy: benefit from information and freedom
o Intrateam coordination
MIP-G Model (DE DREU, NIJSTAD, & VAN KNIPPENBERG, 2008):
- Integrates cognitive and motivational perspectives and proposes that group judgment and decision making is a function of motivated information processing
- Combines insight on human thinking with group-level interaction process and decision making
MIP-G Model: - 2 Types of motivation
o Epistemic motivation: willingness to expend effort rich, accurate understanding
o Social motivation: Individual preference for outcome distributions between oneself and other group members: 1. Proself, 2. Prosocial
Epistemic and social motivation capture influence of two types of variables:
o Dispositional/ personality variables (agreeableness, openness to experience)
o Situational/ structure variables (time pressure, accountability, cultural values)
Team mental models (TMM), (Cannon-Bowers, 1993):
Organized mental representations of the key elements within a team’s relevant environment that are shared across team members:
- Equipment model (knowledge tools)
- Task model (understanding work procedures)
- Team interaction model (awareness of member responsibilities)
- Team model (understanding of teammates)
TMM content is often organized into two major categories:
- Task focused
2. Team focused
TMM properties
- Similarity/Sharedness
2. Accuracy