4. DUAL MODELS OF JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING AND ALTERNATIVES II - GROUP DECISION MAKING & PERFORMANCE Flashcards

1
Q

Benefits of being a part of a group: complex problems, better problem solvers than individuals:

A
  1. New and high risks problems, in which there is no clear action
  2. Demands on a diverse set of skills and competencies
  3. Confrontation between various diverging viewpoints
  4. Interaction, proposal, ideas, solutions
  5. Higher acceptance for decisions  more motivated (your voice is heard/ can see it other way around)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cost of being a part of a group:

A
  1. Take more time in making decision
  2. Individual responsibility may be diluted
  3. Higher risks are taken than if the decision were made individually
  4. Often there are compromises
  5. Potential for conflicts, negative interactions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Social Judgment Scheme (SJS) model (Davis, 1996):

A
  • Member preferences weights are an exponential function of the distances between a given member’s preference and all other members’ preferences
    o Members whose preferences are discrepant from one another receive smaller weights in the group decisions
    o Members whose preferences are similar to one another receive larger weights in the group decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Group efficacy: Which factors facilitate group efficacy

A
  • Leadership:
    o positively with team performances
    o Specific perspectives of leadership: transformational
  • Group Composition:
    o Aggregated characteristics: cognitive ability
    o Member heterogeneity
    o Team size: depends on what to do (Fabric-Team)
  • Task Design:
    o Task meaningfulness: collective performances
    o Autonomy: benefit from information and freedom
    o Intrateam coordination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MIP-G Model (DE DREU, NIJSTAD, & VAN KNIPPENBERG, 2008):

A
  • Integrates cognitive and motivational perspectives and proposes that group judgment and decision making is a function of motivated information processing
  • Combines insight on human thinking with group-level interaction process and decision making
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MIP-G Model: - 2 Types of motivation

A

o Epistemic motivation: willingness to expend effort  rich, accurate understanding
o Social motivation: Individual preference for outcome distributions between oneself and other group members: 1. Proself, 2. Prosocial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Epistemic and social motivation capture influence of two types of variables:

A

o Dispositional/ personality variables (agreeableness, openness to experience)
o Situational/ structure variables (time pressure, accountability, cultural values)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Team mental models (TMM), (Cannon-Bowers, 1993):

A

Organized mental representations of the key elements within a team’s relevant environment that are shared across team members:

  1. Equipment model (knowledge tools)
  2. Task model (understanding work procedures)
  3. Team interaction model (awareness of member responsibilities)
  4. Team model (understanding of teammates)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

TMM content is often organized into two major categories:

A
  1. Task focused

2. Team focused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

TMM properties

A
  1. Similarity/Sharedness

2. Accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly