39.Tribunals and Lok Adalat Flashcards
What is the purpose of a tribunal?
The purpose of a tribunal is to provide speedy, inexpensive, and decentralized dispute resolution in various matters such as administrative or tax-related disputes.
What is the origin of the term “tribunal”?
The term “tribunal” is derived from the word “Tribunes,” which means “Magistrates of the Classical Roman Republic.”
What is Article 323A about?
Article 323A refers to tribunals that are quasi-judicial institutions for the resolution of specific administrative disputes.
What are the functions of tribunals?
The functions of tribunals include adjudicating disputes, determining rights between contesting parties, making administrative decisions, and reviewing existing administrative decisions.
How are tribunals defined?
A tribunal is generally defined as any person or institution with the authority to judge, adjudicate, or determine claims or disputes, regardless of whether it is called a tribunal in its title.
What are the objectives of tribunals?
The objectives of tribunals are to reduce the pendency of cases in various courts, reduce the workload of courts, expedite decisions, and provide a forum manned by lawyers and experts in the relevant areas.
What role do tribunals play in the justice mechanism?
Tribunals play an important and specialized role in the justice mechanism by hearing disputes related to the environment, armed forces, tax, and administrative issues.
When were tribunals incorporated into the Indian Constitution?
Tribunals were incorporated into the Indian Constitution by the 42nd Amendment Act in 1976.
Which article of the Indian Constitution deals with Administrative Tribunals?
Article 323-A deals with Administrative Tribunals.
Which article of the Indian Constitution deals with Tribunals for other matters?
Article 323-B deals with Tribunals for other matters.
What are the matters for which tribunals can be established under Article 323-B?
Tribunals can be established under Article 323-B for disputes relating to taxation, foreign exchange, import and export, industrial and labor issues, land reforms, ceiling on urban property, elections to Parliament and state legislatures, food stuff, and rent and tenancy rights.
How do Articles 323 A and 323 B differ in terms of the establishment of tribunals?
Under Article 323 A, tribunals for public service matters can be established only by Parliament, while under Article 323 B, tribunals for certain other matters can be established by both Parliament and state legislatures within their legislative competence.
Is there a difference in the number and hierarchy of tribunals under Articles 323 A and 323 B?
Yes, under Article 323 A, only one tribunal for the Centre and one for each state or two or more states may be established, and there is no hierarchy of tribunals. Under Article 323 B, a hierarchy of tribunals may be created.
What are the three aspects in which Articles 323 A and 323 B differ?
The three aspects in which Articles 323 A and 323 B differ are the scope of matters for which tribunals can be established, the authority to establish tribunals (Parliament or Parliament and state legislatures), and the possibility of creating a hierarchy of tribunals under Article 323 B.
What is the nature of an Administrative Tribunal?
An Administrative Tribunal performs quasi-judicial functions and is vested with the judicial power of the State.
How is an Administrative Tribunal created?
An Administrative Tribunal is created through a statute.
What principles does an Administrative Tribunal follow?
An Administrative Tribunal follows the principles of natural justice, including acting openly, fairly, and impartially.
Does an Administrative Tribunal have to adhere to strict rules of procedure and evidence?
No, an Administrative Tribunal is not bound by the strict rules of procedure and evidence prescribed by the civil procedure court.
What type of functions does an Administrative Tribunal perform?
An Administrative Tribunal performs quasi-judicial functions, distinct from pure administrative functions.
In what manner is an Administrative Tribunal required to act?
An Administrative Tribunal is required to act judicially, following the principles of natural justice.
What are the key characteristics of an Administrative Tribunal?
An Administrative Tribunal is created by statute, performs quasi-judicial functions, acts judicially, follows natural justice principles, and is not bound by strict civil procedure court rules.
What is the judicial power vested in an Administrative Tribunal?
An Administrative Tribunal is vested with the judicial power of the State.
How should an Administrative Tribunal conduct its proceedings?
An Administrative Tribunal should conduct its proceedings openly, fairly, and impartially.
What is the difference between administrative and quasi-judicial functions?
Administrative functions are different from quasi-judicial functions, and an Administrative Tribunal performs the latter.
What is the relationship between an Administrative Tribunal and the civil procedure court?
An Administrative Tribunal is not bound by the strict rules of procedure and evidence prescribed by the civil procedure court.
What type of power does an Administrative Tribunal exercise?
An Administrative Tribunal exercises judicial power, as it performs quasi-judicial functions.
What is the primary duty of an Administrative Tribunal?
The primary duty of an Administrative Tribunal is to act judicially and follow the principles of natural justice.
How does an Administrative Tribunal ensure fairness in its actions?
An Administrative Tribunal ensures fairness by acting openly, fairly, and impartially.
What rules does an Administrative Tribunal have to adhere to?
An Administrative Tribunal is bound to act judicially and follow the principles of natural justice but is not bound by strict civil procedure court rules.
When was the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) established?
The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) was established in 1985.
What legislation established the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)?
The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) was established through the Administrative Tribunals Act.
Who are the members of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) drawn from?
The members of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) are drawn from judicial and administrative streams.
Who chairs the select committee responsible for the appointment of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) members?
The select committee responsible for the appointment of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) members is chaired by a sitting Judge of the Supreme Court.
Who appoints the members of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)?
The members of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) are appointed by the President.
What is the tenure of the Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)?
The Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has a tenure of 5 years or until the age of 65.
What is the tenure of the Members of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)?
The Members of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) have a tenure of 5 years or until the age of 62.
What jurisdiction does the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) have?
The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has original jurisdiction in relation to recruitment and all service matters of public servants covered by it.
Which individuals or groups are excluded from the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)?
The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) excludes members of the Defence Forces, officers and servants of the Supreme Court, and secretarial staff of the Parliament.
What principle does the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) follow?
The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) follows the Principle of Natural Justice (PNJ).
How does the appeals process work for decisions made by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)?
Appeals against the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) can be made only in the High Courts and not in the Supreme Court, as established in the L Chandra Kumar Case of 1997.
What is the purpose of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)?
The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) adjudicates matters related to employment under the central government.
Is there a separate tribunal for matters related to employment under state governments?
Yes, the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) is established for adjudicating matters related to employment under state governments.
What is the jurisdiction of the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT)?
The State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) has jurisdiction over employment matters under state governments.
What is the appellate authority for decisions made by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)?
The appellate authority for decisions made by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) is the High Courts.
Who has the authority to establish tribunals under Article 323B?
Both Parliament and State Legislatures have the authority to establish tribunals under Article 323B.
Can a hierarchy of tribunals be created under Article 323B?
Yes, a hierarchy of tribunals may be created under Article 323B.
What are some of the matters for which tribunals can be established under Article 323B?
Some of the matters for which tribunals can be established under Article 323B include taxation, foreign exchange, import and export, industrial and labor disputes, land reform, ceiling on urban property, elections to Parliament and State legislatures, food stuffs, and rent and tenancy rights.
What are the four similarities between Article 323A and Article 323B?
The four similarities between Article 323A and Article 323B are:
1.Power to establish the tribunal.
2.Power to empower the tribunal.
3.Procedure to be followed in the tribunal.
4.Exclusion of jurisdiction by the legislature.
What did the Supreme Court rule in the L Chandra Kumar Case (1997)?
In the L Chandra Kumar Case, the Supreme Court ruled that the fourth provision excluding the jurisdiction of High Courts and the Supreme Court is unconstitutional.
What were the grounds on which the Supreme Court held the fourth provision of the L Chandra Kumar Case to be unconstitutional?
The grounds on which the Supreme Court held the fourth provision of the L Chandra Kumar Case to be unconstitutional were:
1.Article 32 and Article 226 are part of the basic structure of the constitution and cannot be excluded.
2.The legislature did not create an equally effective substitute for the High Courts and the Supreme Court when excluding their jurisdiction.
3.Tribunals were meant to have a supplementary role, and appeals should be allowed before the High Courts and the Supreme Court.
4.The L Chandra Kumar case defeated the purpose for which tribunals were created, and a review of this judgment was recommended by the Law Commission’s 215th report.
What is tribunalization?
Tribunalization refers to the transfer of cases from traditional courts to specialized courts.
What are the advantages of tribunalization?
The advantages of tribunalization are:
1.Speedy, cost-affordable, and user-friendly justice systems.
2.Contrast to civil courts based on the Indian Evidence Act, which can be time-consuming.
3.Helps cope with “Docket Explosion” and indicates trust in the judiciary system.
3.Provides a high standard of adjudication.
4.Well-suited for social welfare legislation involving numerous small claims.
What are the disadvantages of tribunals?
The disadvantages of tribunals are:
1.Lack of independence as they are under the control of the sponsoring department or ministry.
2.Sometimes tribunals function without technical members, which can affect their efficiency.
3.Instances where tribunals have operated without a technical member have been objected to, such as in the case of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) by SEBI.
What issues were raised in the L Chandra Kumar (1995) and Sampath Kumar judgments?
The issues raised in these judgments were whether the power conferred upon the Parliament and State Legislature to exclude the jurisdiction of all courts, except the Supreme Court, is constitutional under Article 323A (2)(d) and Article 323B (3)(d) of the Indian Constitution.
What are the benefits of tribunalization?
The benefits of tribunalization include providing speedy, affordable, and user-friendly justice systems, addressing docket explosion, maintaining a high standard of adjudication, and being well-suited for social welfare legislation.
Why have tribunals not performed well according to the given text?
Tribunals have not performed well due to their lack of independence, as they are controlled by the sponsoring department or ministry. Additionally, some tribunals may function without technical members, affecting their effectiveness.