3.4 Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory Flashcards

1
Q

Monotropy:

A

Infants form a single unique attachment bond between an infant and a mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Maternal deprivation

A

Not receiving suitable emotional care from a maternal figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Critical period

A

Suitable emotional care by mother before the age of 2.5 years is essential for healthy emotional development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Critical period risk

A

Continues up to 5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Deprivation consequences are

A

Irreversibility

Negagative consequences due to deprivation are permanent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Value of maternal care

A

Bowlby believed that it wasn’t enough to make sure a child was fed, kept safe and warm

Infants + kids need warm and intimate and continuous relationship with their mother to ensure continuing normal mental health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Long teen consequences of deprivation

A
  • deliquincy and aggressiveness (social development)
  • reduced intelligence (cognitive development)
  • depression (psychological development
  • affectionless psychopathy (emotional / psychological development)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Affectionless psychopathy

A
  • lack of emotion
  • lack of guilt
  • impulsive
  • inability to form meaningful and lasting relationships
  • associsted with criminality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bowlby’s 44 juvenile thieves 1944: aim

A

To determine whether there is a relationship between maternal deprivation in infancy and adolescent delinquency (affectionless psychopathy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bowlby’s 44 juvenile thieves 1944: Procedure

A
  • 44 criminal teenagers accused of stealing
  • all thieves interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy
  • family interviewed to establish whether thieves had prolonged separations from their mothers
  • sample was compared to a control group of 44 non-criminal but emotionally disturbed young people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bowlby’s 44 juvenile thieves 1944: findings

A

14 affectionless psychopaths: 86% 12 had experiences prolonged periods of separation from their mothers

30 non ‘affectionless psychopaths’: 17% 5 had experiences separations from their mothers

Emotional difficulties (NOT psychopath): 4% 2 had experiences foe their mothers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bowlby’s 44 juvenile thieves 1944: conclusion

A

Maternal deprivation in infant leads to emotional and behavioural disorders (affectionless psychopathy)

Most severe form leads to antisocial and criminal behaviour in adolescence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation: Real world application

A

-in 1950s only 25% of hospitals allowed daily visitors

Today parents can stay overnight thanks to this research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation: poor quality of evidence

A
  • Bowlby sampled the kids from his own clinic himself
  • Bowlby conducted intwevws himself
    = investigator bias ~ Bowlby knew in advance which teenagers he expected to show signs of psychopathy

Recent replicas of bowlbys study failed to produce results

Likely that Bowlbys findings exaggerate the relationship between maternal deprivation and affectionless psychopathy ~ overstating effects of maternal deprivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation: deprivation vs privation

A

Privation: failure to form any attachment in first place
Deprivation: loss of primary attachment figure after attachment has taken place

Rutter argues long term effects Bowlby associated with deprivation were actually caused by privation
~ 44 thieves had disrupted early lives and may never formed strong attachments

Bowlby may have overestimated the seriousness of the effects of deprivation in childrens development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation: contradictory evidence

A

Koluchova (1976)

  • Twin boys who were isolated
    from age of 18 months – 7 years
    • Step-mother kept them in a locked cupboard
    • Taken into care and looked after by two loving adults
    • Evidence suggested a full intellectual and emotional recovery given good quality aftercare
    • Critical period better seen as ‘sensitive period’
17
Q

Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation: socially sensitive

A
  • End of WW2 ~ women have freedom and can work - Bowlby says its damaging their children
    • Blaming mothers for children’s issues
    • Implying mothers should be constantly with their children + not go back to work or leave kids in daycare ~ guilt
    • Neglecting role of father in child’s upbringing
      ○ Role of the father isn’t as significant as the mother
      ○ No blame goes on father

Provide temporary homes for parents