1.6 Minority Influence Flashcards

1
Q

Minority influence

A

Persuasive minority changes the attitudes and beliefs and/or behaviours of the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Minority influence lead to

A

Internalisation of minority viewpoint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Minority influence differ from majority influence

A

Majority maintains status quo

Minority goes against it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Succesful minority needs to show:

A

CCF

Commitment
Consistency
Flexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Commitment

A
  • staying strong
  • engaging in extreme activities to draw attention
    Shows dedication

Important to take risks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Commitment lead ot

A

Others paying more attention

Augmentation principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Consistency

A
  • unchanging in opinion
  • appears unbiased
  • increase interest from majority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Consistency lead to

A
  • others starting to rethink their own views

- minority seen as mroe certain, confident and competent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Moscovici 1969: aim

A

To investigate the effect of consistency on minority influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Moscovici 1969: method

A

172 female American ppts
Told colour perception experiment
6 ppts asked to estimate the colour, out loud , of 36 slides (diff shades of blue
2 of 6 ppts confeds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Moscovici 1969: conditions

A
  1. Consistent
    Confeds called the slides green on all trials
  2. Inconsistent
    Confess called slides green 24 times, blue 12
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Moscovici 1969: results

A

Consistent: influences by minority , called slides green in 8.4% of trials

Inconsistent condition: called slides green in 1.25% on trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Moscovici 1969: conclusion

A

Consistent minority mode effective than inconsistent
Consistent - 8.4
Inconsistent - 1.25

Although minority only partially succesful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

flexibility

A

Must be prepared to adapt views and accept reasonable and valid counter arguments

Balance between consistency and flexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Not flexible lead to

A

Consistent minorities who are inflexible in their beliefs, will not be eprusssive as they are off putting ro majorities
- rigid + dogmatic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Nemeth 1986: aim

A

To investigate whether a flexible minority could influence a majority to give less compensation to a victim of a ski lift accident

17
Q

Nemeth 1986: method

A
  • groups of 4, had to agree on amount of compensation they would give a victim of a ski-lift accident
  • 1 confed
  • 2 conditions
18
Q

Nemeth 1986: conditions

A
  1. When the minority argued for a low rate of compensation and refused to changed its position
  2. When the minority argued for a low rate of compensation but compromised by offering a slightly higher rate of compensation
19
Q

Nemeth 1986: results

A

Found inflexible condition, the minority had little or no effect on majority

Flexible condition, majority was much more likely to compromise and change their view

20
Q

Nemeth 1986: conclusion

A

A flexible minority is more effective than an inflexible one

21
Q

Strengths of minority influence consistency

A
  • moscovici
  • consistent minority most influential - meta analysis Wood et al 1994 - 100 studies

But 8% of agreement with minority still low - rare

22
Q

Strengths of minority influence flexibility

A

Nemeth 1986

23
Q

Limitations of minority influence

A
  • artificial tasks x different to real world (jury decision making vs colour of a slide)
  • complicated in real life
    Hostile majorities - consequences for identifying with minority
    Research doesn’t tell us much about real world