3: Demand Flashcards

1
Q

income expansion path

A

how the optimal bundle changes as income changes

x2 vs. x1 space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

engel curve

A

how optimal consumption of one good changes as income changes

m vs. x1 space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

normal good

A

as income increases, demand increases

positive engel slope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

inferior good

A

as income increases, demand decreases

negative engel slope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

offer curve

A

how the optimal bundle changes as price changes
x2 vs. x1 space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ordinary good

A

as price increases, demand decreases

demand curve slopes down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

giffen good

A

as price increases, demand increases

demand curve has a positive slope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

substitutes

A

demand for one good increases as the price of the other good increases

dx1*/dp2 > 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

complements

A

demand for one good decreases as the price of the other good increases

dx1*/dp2 < 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

total price change decomposed into

A

substitution effect and income effect

effect of PP change and relative price change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

substitution effect

A

relative price effect

if the relative price of two goods change, we expect the consumer’s new bundle to include more of the cheaper good at the expense of the more expensive good

Z - X

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

income effect

A

PP effect
- similar to an income change

if the relative price of a good changes and income stays the same, we expect the consumer’s new bundle to include more of both goods because the consumer is “richer”

Y - Z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

slutsky decomposition question

A

what if a consumer faced a budget line with the same slope (prices are the same relative prices) but they can still afford the original bundle?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

slutsky decomposition

A

controlling for PP since you can afford original prices but relative prices are different

start with old budget and optimal point x
draw new budget line after price change and new optimal point y
draw hypothetical budget with same slope as new budget which crosses x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

substitution and income effect in slutsky decomposition

A

substitution effect must be negative if preferences are monotonic
- when price increases, substitution effect is to consume less
- when price decreases, substitution effect is to consume more

income effect can go either way
- depends on whether the good is normal or inferior
- if the income effect is strong in the opposite direction to the substitution effect, we have a giffen good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

hicks decomposition question

A

what if a consumer faced a new price ratio but their optimal choice was on the same indifference curve as before?

start with old budget line and optimal point x
draw new budget line after price change and new optimal point y
draw hypothetical budget line with same slope as the new budget line which is tangent to the old IC

17
Q

slutsky vs. hicks

A

slutsky is useful since its based on observables and not utility
- decomposed by focusing on affordability of the old bundle after the price change

hicks is useful to measure welfare changes and compensation
- decomposed by focusing on utility of the old bundle after price change
- 2 ICs
- harder to measure in the real world

18
Q

PED

A

% change in QD / % change in P

the steeper the demand curve, the more inelastic

19
Q

PED equation

A
  • dx1/p1 (p1/x1)
20
Q

PED < 1

A

inelastic demand

% demand response is smaller than % price change

21
Q

PED > 1

A

elastic demand

% demand response is bigger than % price change

22
Q

income expansion path for cobb-douglas function

A

higher weight on good 1 than good 2 on the utility function makes the liner flatter

lower price of good 1 also makes the liner flatter

if p1=p2 and there are equal weights, the consumer always spends half their income no each good
- 45 degree line from origin

23
Q

when is the substitution effect 0?

A

optimal choice on the hypothetical budget line exactly the same as the optimal choice on the original budget line

24
Q

MRS > p1/p2

A

there are bundles above that are preferred

willing to give up more than necessary (by price constraint)