1-2: Preferences, Constraints and Choice Flashcards
bundle
collection of goods
fundamental concept of choice theory
people have preferences over bundles, not goods
preference
ordering
utility function
function that takes a bundle as an input and returns a single number
two assumptions of consumer preference
completeness
- consumer can successfully compare all bundles without not knowing how they feel
- implies reflexivity where every bundle is at least as good at itself
transitivity for triples
- if they prefer x to y to z, then they must prefer x to z
characteristics of utility functions
ordinal not cardinal
- only relative magnitudes matter, but not the size of the utility number
two assumptions of well-behaved preferences
monotonicity
- more of a good is better than less
- formally, there is one good such that the consumer prefers a bundle with a higher amount of that good all else equal
convexity
- average consumption bundles are preferred to extremes
- formally, strictly convex indifference curves imply that for any two bundles, the weighted average is strictly preferred by the consumer over either
marginal rate of substitution
rate at which the consumer is willing to trade one good for another
slope of the indifference curve
- varies depending on where on the IC you’re at
slope of the budget line
market rate of exchange between the two goods
relative price of good 1
- how much of good 2 must you give up to be able to afford a little more of good 1
optimal choices for well-behaved preferences are characterised by?
tangency
market rate of exchange is equal to private erate of exchange
tangency method
find MRS
apply tangency (only when preferences are well-behaved)
- slope of MRS = slope of budget line
equation of budget line
solution to cobb-douglas utility maximisation problem
u = clnx1 + dlnx2
x1* = (c/c+d)m/p1
x2* = (d/c+d)m/p2
order-preserving/monotonic transformations
whenever the first function gives a higher utility number to bundle A over B, the second utility function will do so as well
shows the ordinal and not cardinal nature of utility functions
u=min(a,b)
perfect complements
u=a+b
perfect substitutes