2.3.1 - Baddeley (1966b): influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences Flashcards

1
Q

what was Baddeley’s aim?

A

to investigate the influence of acoustic and semantic word similarity on learning and recall in short- and long-term memory - specifically, to see whether people make acoustic errors when recalling information over long periods of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why did Baddeley want to conduct this experiment?

A

earlier studies had shown him that when people store words over short timescales, they make errors based on how the words sound, suggesting they store them using acoustic encoding

therefore, he wanted to see whether people also made acoustic errors when recalling information over long time periods of time or if they made a different type of error, to establish whether there were one or two memory systems working

existing researchers who looked at STM and LTM did so in different ways, but he worked out how to do it in the same way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was the independent variable?

A

whether words were semantically similar or dissimilar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the dependent variable?

A

the number of errors pps made while recalling the list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was the sample?

A

men and women from the Applied Psychology Research Unit subject panel
they were assigned to one of the 4 list conditions as an independent groups design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how did Baddeley investigate his aim?

A

using a lab experiment which tested sequential recall of acoustically and semantically similar word lists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the procedure?

A
  1. 4 lists of 10 words were created - list A was acoustically similar, list B was acoustically dissimilar, list C was semantically similar and list D was semantically dissimilar
  2. pps first had a hearing test where they listened and copied each word presented in a random order from the list
  3. pps were then presented visually with the word list in the correct order
  4. after the visual presentation, pps completed six tasks which involved memory for digits, before recalling the word list by writing the sequence in the correct order (they could see the list in a random order as it was a test of learning the sequence order, not the words)
  5. the visual presentation process was repeated over 4 learning trials
  6. following these trials, groups completed a 15 minute interference task where they copied 8 digit sequences
  7. after this, a retest was given of the word list sequence
  8. Baddeley recorded the number of correct and incorrect answers from pps in each trial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

why did Baddeley choose to test recall using participant’s memory of the position of the words rather than what the words were?

A

because their existing knowledge of the words would have affected their ability to remember what the words were, but not the position of the words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what were the results for lists A and B (acoustically similar and dissimilar)?

A

the pattern across the five trials was the same - across the first 3 trials, recall accuracy increased from 30%-40% up to 70% and didn’t improve beyond that (but overall it improved)

however, recall of the similar list was worse than the dissimilar list for the first 3 trials, and then better for the 4th and the retest (suggests information stored acoustically in short term)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were the results for lists C and D (semantically similar and dissimilar)?

A

recall accuracy was around 30% for both lists in the first trial

for the semantically dissimilar list, accuracy rose over the 4 trials to about 85%, and remained there for the retest

for the semantically similar list, accuracy peaked at around 55% after 3 trials and didn’t improved from there - had the most errors but they didn’t appear until the 3rd/4th trial (so semantically similar list harder to remember over longer periods)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what conclusions did Baddeley come to?

A

as the acoustically similar list was harder to recall in the initial trials, short-term memory must encode information acoustically

a long-term memory store must be encoding information semantically, because pps in the semantically similar group made errors when trying to to retrieve the correct word in later trials, as they retrieved the incorrect word due to it having a similar meaning

this means human memory must at least consist of short-term memory which uses acoustic encoding and long-term memory which uses semantic encoding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

strengths - replicability and reliability?

A

conducted in a controlled laboratory environment and used standardised procedure eg. same 4 word lists - allows other researchers to replicate and establish reliability of results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

strengths - internal validity?

A

many control variables used eg. all pps went through same process of trials and interference task - allows Baddeley to establish cause and effect relationship between how information is stored and how well it is remembered in the short- and long-term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

weaknesses - generalisability?

A

task had low mundane realism as we wouldn’t normally learn lists of random monosyllabic words
we also wouldn’t normally rehearse information in such a contrived manner
means findings can’t be generalised to everyday situations where we remember stuff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly