2.1 - Biological theories of criminality Flashcards
Types of biological theories
Physiological, Genetic, Brain injuries/disorders, Biochemical
Physiological theories
Physical traits of the individuals (Lombroso, Sheldon)
Genetic theories
Inherited from family (Twin studies, adoption studies, Jacob’s XYY)
Lombroso’s Atavism theory
There are physical differences & traits that are different between criminals & non-criminals (examined skulls & facial features of criminals)
Atavistic
Not as evolved/earlier primitive stage of evolution where they are unable to control impulses & have reduced sensitivity
Physical characteristics of criminals according to Lombroso
- Enormous jaw
- High cheekbones
- Prominent eyebrow arches
- Handle-shaped ears
- Flat nose (thieves)/Pointed nose (murderers)
- Exceptionally long arms
Strengths of Lombroso’s theory
- Credible (Butcher & Taylor - less attractive individuals are more likely to be considered criminals - supports physical features leading to criminality)
- Scientific (first person to study crime using objective measurements to gather evidence)
Limitations of Lombroso’s theory
- Reductionist (not everyone with atavistic features is a criminal & vice versa)
- Ungeneralisable (lack of a control group in research - would’ve found non-criminals with same characteristics)
Sheldon’s somatotypes theory
Criminality is based off of body types (somatotypes) - advanced from Lombroso’s theory (examined 4000 men - college students or criminals - and categorised them into 3 types -> more likely to be mesomorphic if criminal)
3 types of somatotypes
- Ectomorph (thin & fragile, lacking muscle & fat, flat chest w/narrow hips & shoulders)
- Endomorph (rounded, soft, fat w/o muscle w/wider hips)
- MESOMORPH (more muscles, attracted to risk of crime)
Strengths of Sheldon’s theory
- Generalisable (larger sample size of 200 & control group of non-criminals to compare to)
- Credible (Glueck & Glueck - sample of delinquents had 60% mesomorphs where sample of non-delinquents had 31%)
Limitations of Sheldon’s theory
- Reductionist (Glueck & Glueck found criminality is best explained through a combination of biological, psychological & environmental factors - Sheldon claims only biological)
- Invalid (does not take into account how people’s somatotypes change & are not fixed at birth)
Twin studies
Study into monozygotic (identical) & dizygotic (fraternal) twins & if one MZ twin possesses a criminal gene, so will the other, but if one DZ twin possesses a criminal genes, only a 50% of the other possessing it (concordance rates)
Strengths of twin studies
- Credible (Christiansen found 35% concordance rate between MZ twins in 3586 twin pairs and only a 13% with DZ)
- Logical (studying MZ twins, that are genetically identical, is logical to examine whether the other is also offending)
Limitations of twin studies
- Ungeneralisable (small sample sizes in twin studies -> unrepresentative of general population)
- Invalid (impossible to isolate & measure effect of genes from environmental effects -> correlational data not causational)