2020- Intoxication Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

when is intoxication a defence

A

when someone is unable to form mens rea through through alcohol or drug use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

when is voluntary intoxication a defence

A

a defence for specific intent crimes if mens rea due to alcohol or drugs
no defence to basic intent offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

when is involuntary intoxication a defence

A

a defence to all charges if D failed to form mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

r v groark

A

d must provide evidence of intoxication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DPP v Beard

A

drunkeness is taken into account for specific intent crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bratty

A

drunk man was so drunk he had a defence to murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are specific intent crimes

A
Murder
Wounding or causing GBH with intent 
Theft 
Robbery
Burglary
Criminal Damage/Arson with intent 
Attempts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does voluntary intoxication do to specific intent crimes

A

gives an alternative verdict eg making murder, manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

does drunken intent still show intent

A

yes- R v Sheehan, R v Heard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

r v coley

A

drinking alongside intent does not equal the defence of intoxication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

r v walsh

A

only drinking a small amount means it can’t be used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does dutch courage mean and where does it stand in law

A

when someone drinks in order to give them courage in this case a crime. in this case intoxication can’t be used for specific intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the rule of basic intent

A

not used as a defence because no specific intent is needed already- R v Lipman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Caldwell

A

shows that self induced intoxication is no defence to a crime in which recklessness is enough to form the mens rea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Fortheringham

A

for rape it was held that self induced intoxication is not a defence regardless whether the issue is consent, intention or identity of victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are some basic intent offences

A
Manslaughter
Wounding or inflicting GBH
ABH
Assault 
battery
rape/sexual assault
17
Q

DPP v Majewski

A

there is no defence to basic intent crimes because the courts want to protect the public

18
Q

what counts as involuntary intoxication

A

Spiked drinks
adverse reaction to perscription drugs
unexpected recation to sedative drugs
intoxication under duress

19
Q

spiked drinks cases

A

R v Eatch (1980); R v Kingston (1994)

20
Q

adverse reaction to medication cases

A

R v Bailey (1983)

21
Q

unexpected reaction to sedative drugs cases

A

R v Hardie (1984)

22
Q

R v Kingston

A

still guilty of serious sex offence as for all it was involuntary intoxication he still had some elements of mens rea present

23
Q

R v Allen

A

not being aware of a drinks strength is not involuntary intoxication