20.03.20 Microdeletions/microduplication syndromes Flashcards

1
Q

What are microdeletions/duplications

A

Loss or gains of a portion of chromosome (<5-10Mb)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What two types of microdeletion/duplication syndrome (MMSs) are there

A
  • Single gene syndromes. Due to loss/gain of a dosage-sensitive gene. Eg. PMP22 in CMT1A/HNPP or NF1 in neurofibromatosis type 1. Neighbouring genes may be involved but are not dosage sensitive.
  • Contiguous gene syndromes. Loss/gain of multiple contiguous adjacent genes, some of which are dosage sensitive. e.e. Williams syndrome.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the common basis for MMS

A
  • Low copy repeats (LCRs), i.e. segmental duplications. DNA blocks of 10-400kb with high degree of homology (>97%)
  • Non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR)- between misaligned repeats of the same sequence but different chromosomal location
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Different types of NAHR

A
  • Interchromosomal (between two homologous chromosomes)
  • Intrachromosomal (between chromatids of the same chromosome)
  • Intrachromatid (on the same chromatid)
  • Each type can then be direct, inverted or complex.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are NAHR hotpots

A
  • Positions within LCRs where cross overs preferentially occur.
  • Usually in regions of identical nucleotide sequence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is minimal efficient processing segment (MEPS)

A
  • The minimal stretch of identity required to enable homologous recombination.
  • Length of MEPS can be different between meiosis and mitosis.
  • Distance between LCRs could play a role in MEPS length (the larger the distance between LCRs, the longer the MEPS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why are more microdeletions are reported than microduplications

A
  • In theory, for every microdeletion syndrome there should be a reciprocal microduplication syndrome (CMT1A and HNPP)
  • Hypothesis- microduplications result in milder phenotype. E.g. trisomy is better tolerated than monosomy.
  • Techniques (FISH) are less sensitive to microduplications. Less so for arrays.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What factors influence variable expressivity and reduced penetrance in microdeletions/duplications

A
  • Variable breakpoints
  • Differences in genetic background (presence of additional modifying variants)
  • Unmasking of recessive variants on the second allele (or a second hit variant)
  • Epigenetic modifications (PWS/AS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Example of reciprocal microdeletion/duplication syndromes

A
  • 17p11.2, encompassing PMP22 gene.
  • NAHR between two LCRs known as CMT1A-REPs, which share 98.7% sequence identity.
  • CMT1A (Charcot Marie-Tooth)= duplications
  • HNPP (Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies)= deletions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Review of CMT1A

A
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth
  • Demyelinating peripheral neuropathy characterised by distal muscle weakness and atrophy, pes cavus, sensory loss and slow nerve conduction velocity.
  • Caused by duplications of PMP22 (70-80% of CMT1) 17p11.2
  • 1 in 10,000
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Review of HNPP

A
  • Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies
  • Deletion of 17p11.2 which includes PMP22 (80% cases)
  • 2-5 per 100,000 (thought to be higher but many have no or few symptoms)
  • Milder condition: repeated focal pressure neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome and peroneal palsy with foot drop.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe another 2 disorders caused by either deletion/duplication of 17p11.2

A
  • Smith-Magenis syndrome

- Potocki-Lupski syndrome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Review Smith-Magenis syndrome

A
  • Distinctive facial features (brachycephaly, broad face), brachydactyly, dev delay, hypotonia in infancy.
  • Deletions of 17p11.2 (70% cases) and mutations in RAI1 gene.
  • 1:25,000 births.
  • Usually de novo
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Review Potocki-Lupski syndrome

A
  • Mild intellectual disability, autistic features, hypotonia, failure to thrive.
  • Duplications of 17p11.2 (60% cases)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Review of Williams syndrome

A
  • Del 7q11.23
  • Characterised by supravalvar aortic stenosis, elfin face, connective tissue abnormalities, over friendly personality, mild intellectual disability.
  • Contiguous deletion of WBSCR (Williams-Beuren syndrome critical region). Includes ELN gene.
  • WBSCR is flanked by LCRs, predisposing it to NAHR.
  • 95% have a 1.55Mb deletion, 5% have 1.84Mb.
  • Often de novo, however could be inherited from an unaffected parent with a paracentric inversion involving WBSCR.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Review of PWS

A
  • Prader-Willi syndrome
  • hypotonia, feeding difficulties in infancy. Dev delay, insatiable appetite, in childhood.
  • 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 15,000
  • Due to absence of expression of imprinted genes in the paternally derived PWS/AS region (15q11.2-q13)
  • Either due to maternal UPD, paternal deletion (75%), or rarely an imprinting defect
  • Contiguous disorder due to the loss of several genes (SNURF-SNRPN, NDN, PWRN1, MAGEL2)
17
Q

Review of AS

A
  • Angelman syndrome
  • Severe developmental delay, speech impairment, gait ataxia, microcephaly, seizures.
  • 1 in 12,000 to 1 in 20,000
  • Caused by disruption of maternally imprinted UBE3A in 15q11.2-13.
  • 68% have maternal allele deletion
18
Q

Review DiGeorge/ Velocardiofacial syndrome

A
  • 22q11.2 deletion.
  • Variable phenotype that includes: cardiac defects, cleft palate, learning difficulties, hypocalcemia.
  • 1 in 4,000 to 1 in 6,395
  • 85% have 3Mb deletion (encompassing 40 genes)
  • Majority are de novo, 7% are inherited
  • Significant intrafamilial variability.
19
Q

Review Miller-Dieker syndrome

A
  • Del 17p13.3
  • Lissencephaly, microcephaly, severe mental retardation
  • Usually de novo, but 20% have inherited from a parent who carries a balanced chromosome rearrangement.
20
Q

Examples of terminal microdeletion syndromes

A
  • Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS)

- Cri-du-chat syndrome

21
Q

Review Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome

A
  • Del 4p16.3
  • 1 in 50,000
  • typical craniofacial features, growth delay, intellectual disability, seizures.
  • ~50% have a pure deletion, the rest have an unbalanced translocation
22
Q

Review Cri-du-chat syndrome

A
  • Deletions of 5p (between 5p13-5p15.2)
  • 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 50,000
  • distinctive cat-like cry, dev delay, microcephaly, hypotonia in infancy
  • 85% de novo, 15% result of an unbalanced translocation
23
Q

Methods to detect MMS

A
  • Genomic microarrays
  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization
  • quantitative PCR
  • Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
24
Q

Databases for MMSs

A
  • Database of genomic variants (DGV)

- Chromosome anomaly collection

25
Q

Catalogues of pathological imbalances

A
  • Decipher (database of chromosomal imbalance and phenotype in humans using ensemble resources)
  • ECARUCA (European cytogeneticists association register of unbalanced chromosome aberrations)
  • HGMD