2. Preliminaries to Prosecution Flashcards
What do police powers of investigation include?
arrest
Detention
interrogation
entry & search of premises
personal search
ID procedures
sample taking
What statute governs the police investigative powers?
PACE 1984 & PACE Codes of Practice
are the codes admissible as evidence?
yes in both criminal and civil proceedings under s.67(11) PACE
Does the failure of an officer to have regard to the provisions of the code render them liable to criminal/civil proceedings?
No it does not, of itself, render them liable s.67(10) PACE
definition of interview
questioning of a person regarding their involvement or suspected involvement in a criminal offence or offences, which, MUST be carried out under caution.
when must a suspect be cautioned
must be cautioned before any questions about the offence
OR
Further questions if the answers provide grounds for suspicion are put to them
IF
either the answers or silence may be given in evidence to a court in prosecution
when is a caution not necessary?
- to establish identity
- to establish ownership of a vehicle
- to obtain info in accord with a stat requirement
- in furtherance of a proper & effective search
- to seek verification of a written record of comments made by P outside interview
is it an interview if no caution is needed?
no, it does not amount to an interview if no caution is needed
does questioning about an offence with grounds to suspect party being questioned amount to an interview even if they have not been arrested?
Yes, questioning of a person about an offence of which there are grounds to suspect him or her will amount to an interview even if the person has not been arrested and no decision to arrest has been made
what does the reference to “an offence” mean?
means a caution must be given if the person is questioned about an offence other than that for which they have been arrested IF there are grounds to suspect the person of it.
Where should a person usually be interviewed?
police station or other authorised place of detention.
What does decision to arrest mean and how does this relate to questioning?
if a police officer has decided to arrest a person, then the arrest must not be delayed in order to question the suspect before arresting them
what are the exceptions to interviewing at a police station?
interviews are to be conducted at a police station unless delay would be likely to:
- lead to interference with or harm to evidence connected to offence, physical harm to others, serious/loss damage to property or
- lead to alerting of other persons suspected of offence (who have not yet been arrested)
- hinder recovery of property obtained in commission of an offence.
when does the exception to interview in police station cease?
as soon as the risk has been averted or relevant questions have been put to avert risk
does the officer have to be at the police station?
no they can be via live link but their duties remain the same as if they were in person
what is the role of the custody officer in a live link interview situation?
they can transfer, or permit the transfer of the detained person to a police officer for the purpose of a live link interview conducted by another officer
when must a caution be administered?
upon arrest
AND
at the commencement of the interview regardless of whether it is at a police station or not
when must the suspect be reminded of the caution?
at recommencement of interview after any break.
If there is any doubt, the full caution must be given again.
what are the words of the caution ?
You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in Court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.
does the caution have to be exactly worded?
minor deviation is allowed, sense of caution to be preserved.
what should be done if a suspect does not understand the caution
the person giving it should explain it in his or her own words
when are the caution words “‘You do not have to say anything, but anything you do say may be given in evidence’.”
when a suspect is interviewed after charge OR where they have requested a solicitor but have not been able to consult with one.
(this is because inferences cannot be drawn under s.34,36 or 37 in these circs)
caution if a statement is taken after charge?
not required but should be given
what does “grounds to suspect” mean?
some reasonable, objective grounds for the suspicion based on known facts or information
how is it determined whether there are sufficient grounds for administering a caution?
objectively
failure to caution is classed as what?
failure to caution where it is required is a significant and substantial breach of Code C
does not necessarily result in the exclusion of evidence of the interview.
what information should a person being interviewed and their solicitor (if present) be given before the interview
must be given, before the interview, sufficient information to make it possible to understand the nature of the suspected offence and why the person is suspected of committing it.
does not include disclosure of something to prejudice the investigation.
when should a special warning be given?
where :
- suspect is interview at police station or other authorised place of detention;
- Following arrest
and suspect is asked to account for:
- object, mark or substance, or mark on such objects found on his or her person, in or on his or her clothing or footwear OR
- his or her presence at the place where the arrest took place
what happens if a special warning is not given?
Inferences cannot be drawn
when is a special warning not required
where suspect has requested to consult solicitor and has not had opp to consult - since again inferences cannot be drawn
when must info about legal advice be given?
Interviewing officer must remind suspect of entitlement to free legal advice AND that the interview can be delayed for legal advice to be obtained
UNLESS
- access to a solicitor has been delayed or
- one of the exceptions applies.
violation of information about legal advice?
may lead to exclusion of evidence
what is a significant statement?
one which appears to be capable of being used in evidence, and in particular a direct admission of guilt
what is a significant silence?
failure / refusal to answer a Q OR
Answer satisfactorily when under caution
WHICH
might give rise to adverse inference
how must interviewing officer deal with significant statements or silences?
the interviewing officer must, after cautioning the suspect, put to the suspect any significant statement or silence which occurred in the presence and hearing of a police officer or other police staff (and which has not been put in the course of a previous interview)
what should police officers / other interviewers not do in interview?
- try to obtain answers/elicit statement by using oppression
- indicate what action they will take if suspect refuses to answer question / make a statement
when can an officer indicate what action they will take if suspect refuses to answer question / make a statement?
in response to a direct question they may inform suspect of proposed action (e.g. keeping them in detention).
Any answer must be proper and warranted.
can police still pursue interrogation if suspect is denying / refusing to answer questions?
yes, police officers to pursue their interrogation of a suspect with a view to eliciting admissions even where the suspect denies involvement in the offence or declines to answer specific questions
will every trick used in interview result in the exclusion of evidence?
no, but there is a positive duty on the police to not actively mislead a suspect.
Examples of oppressive interviewing…
- questioning carried on after repeated denials or refusals
- hectoring & bullying throughout interview
- tricking Suspect into believing incriminating fingerprints had been found
examples given of when questioning was not oppressive
NOT OPPRESSIVE = questioning that was rude and discourteous, with raised voices and some bad language
When should the interview cease?
if the suspect is not charged nor informed that they may be prosecuted - Interview MUST cease when OIC is satisfied that:
- questions relevant to getting accurate info have been put to suspect AND
- officer has taken account of other available evidence AND
- officer believes there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction
when can the police continue questioning beyond the point of being satisfied of sufficient evidence to charge?
if officer believes that further questions could or should be put to the suspect
who determines when there is sufficient evidence to charge (detained suspect)?
the custody officer has formal responsibility for making the decision as to whether there is sufficient evidence to charge but once OIC is satisfied they take them to custody officer without delay
how does the custody officer decide where there is sufficient evidence to charge ?
Full code test is applied
recording of interviews?
interviews must be recorded
comment relevant to suspected offence made outside interview (inc unsolicited comments) must be recorded and suspect must (where practicable) be given the opp to verify the record
failure to record interview …
can lead to exclusion of evidence
what are the special categories of persons
child/young person
mentally disordered persons
vulnerable persons
intoxicated person