13. The rules relating to the examination of Witnesses Flashcards
What is EIC?
Calling witness to elicit evidence supportive of party’s case.
what is the general rule for leading questions in EIC?
no leading = general rule.
Evidence elicited by leading questions = inadmissible
examples of when leading has been allowed in EIC?
where witness has already given evidence
to identify objects/persons
witness is hostile
formal intro matters - name address etc
when may leading questions be allowed?
if in interests of justice and at discretion of judge.
what rule governs memory refreshing?
s.139 CJA 2003
what conditions must be satisfied for court to allow memory refresh?
- witness gives evidence that document records their recollection at time it was made AND
- their recollection at that time is likely to have been significantly better than at the time of oral evidence
who can make an application for memory refreshing?
usually the advocate (almost always pros) but
judge can also if in interests of justice that they refresh.
when can a witness refresh their memory?
EIC or
Re-examination
what is meaning of verified document in memory refresh?
document = anything in which info recorded
verified = doc must either have been made by witness or if made by another witness must have verified it
can witnesses memory refresh out of court - before going to witness box?
Yes. Generally they are given their statements before going into box.
can witnesses discuss evidence with other witnesses?
No.
* do not discuss case;
* do not read statements to witnesses when other witnesses are present
if it happens and leads to fabrication = can dismiss evidence/direct jury as to weight.
can witnesses refresh memory out of court AFTER going into witness box?
yes in some cases they can leave the box to refresh from statement in peace.
can counsel for the opposition see memory refreshing documents?
if witness has refreshed out of court and before entering witness box, counsel can inspect memory refreshing doc and X-examine witness on the document.
what rule governs admissibility of previous complaints?
s.120 CJA 2003
when is a witness’s previous complaint admissible?
conditions:
* witness testifies that they made statement and it is true AND
- witness claims offence committed against them;
- offence is one to which proceedings relate;
- complaint is about conduct whihc if proved would constitute the offence / part of it;
- complaint was not made as a result of threat/promise and
- witness gives oral evidence in connection with its subject matter.
what is the general rule about previous consistent (self-serving) statements?
witness may not be asked about previous statement which is consistent with their evidence nor can another witness enter it into evidence.
what are the exceptions to the exclusion of self-serving statements
- accusation
- to rebut recent fabrication
when will self serving statements be admitted via the accusation exception?
admitted as evidence to show the reaction of the accused when first taxed with the incriminating facts.
when will self serving statements be admitted via the recent fabrication exception?
can be admitted as evidence to rebut a suggestion that his or her oral evidence has been fabricated will be admissible for the truth of its contents and to support the witness’s credibility.
when does the “recent fabrication exception” apply?
not enough for evidence to have been impeached in X. It will only apply where in X it is suggested that their evidence is a recent fabrication.
when are previous inconsistent statements admissible?
if witness admits making previous statement then it is admissible as evidence of matter stated.
which section governs previous inconsistent statements?
s.119 CJA 2003
who are inconsistent statements evidence against?
only evidence against maker. cannot be used against co-accused