2- Explaining Phobias [Behaviourist Explanation] Flashcards

1
Q

According to the behavioural approach what can abnormal behaviour be caused by?

A
  1. Classical conditioning
  2. Operant conditioning
  3. Social Learning Theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

which scientist proposed to the two-process model?

A

Mowrer (1947)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was the two process model?

A
  • phobias are learnt through classical conditioning
  • phobias are maintained via operant conditioning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the two phases within the two process model?

A

PHASE ONE: initiation
PHASE TWO: maintenance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

whats in the initiation phase?

A

classical conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe classical conditioning of a fear of wasps

A

before:
WASP (ns) = NO RESPONSE (ucr)
STING (ucs) = PAIN (ucr)

during:
WASP (ns) + STING (ucs) = PAIN (ur)

after:
WASP (cs) = FEAR (cr)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is in the second phase of the two-way model?

A

operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how can phobias be maintained via operant conditioning?

A

they can be negatively reinforced, as the behaviour is strengthened because an unpleasant consequence is removed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

describe the maintenance of a person with a phobia with dogs? (via operant conditioning)

A
  1. a person with a phobia of dogs may cross the road to avoid it
  2. avoidance reduces the feelings of anxiety, negatively reinforcing their behaviour
  3. anxiety reduction reinforces their irrational beliefs
  4. as a result it will influence the person to continue to avoid dogs and maintain their phobias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

describe the ‘Little Albert’ Case study, conducted in 1920 by Watson and Raynor

A
  1. Watson and Raynor were interested in taking Pavlov’s theory of classical conditioning further, including emotional reactions within classical conditioning
  2. the child participant was known as Little Albert
  3. At 9 months Albert was exposed to stimuli and showed no reaction/fear
  4. Watson used a loud bang, associated with the presence of a white rat to classically condition Albert to become scared
  5. Watson recorded emotions of distress and upset from Albert
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what did Watson and Raynor discover with stimulus generalisation regarding Little Albert?

A

they found his fear generalised to all furry animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what were the main criticisms with the Little Albert Case study?

A
  • there were no measurable means
  • no ethics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what were the strengths of behaviourist explanations?

A
  • ## two process model, was a good explanatory power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what were the limitations of the behaviourist explanantion?

A

-does not regard cognitive aspects of phobias
- alternative explanations for avoidance
- many psychologists argue the two process model is incomplete

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What’s the case study called?

A

Little Albert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly