2 - Ch 5 Flashcards
Prohibition of prices
any agreement to charge an agreed-upon price is per se violation of the Sherman Act
The Sherman Act
Price discussion among competitors is considered an attempt to monopolize
Monopolization
courts must determine whether the business has market power, the ability to control price and exclude competitors. Purposeful conduct to exclude competitors is a monopoly
The Clayton Act
prohibits mergers that will lessen competition or create a monopoly
Price discrimination is permitted if justified
-a difference in grade, quality, or quantity
-the cost in transition
-a good-faith effort to meet competition
-differences in marginal cost
-deterioration of goods or a close-out sale
resale price maintenance
an attempt by manufacturers to control the prices that retailers can charge for their goods
Tying
when the seller makes a buyer who wants to purchase one product buy an additional product that he or she does not want
Robinson-Patman Act
a federal statute designed to eliminate price discrimination in interstate commerce
price discrimination
the charging by a seller of different prices to different buyers for commodities of similar grade and quality, resulting in reduced competition or a tendency to create a monopoly
market power
the ability to control price and exclude competitors
tying
the anticompetitive practice of requiring buyers to purchase one product in order to get another
divestiture order
a court order to dispose of interests that could lead to a monopoly
takeover laws
laws that guard against unfairness in corporate takeover situations
treble damages
three times the damages actually sustained