2. Alexander II Flashcards
Alex II
Tutored by…
Mikail Spernsky (reformer)
Vasily Zhukovsky (romantic poet)
= leading him to be far more liberal than father
Characteristics which showed him as ‘weak’
- Admitted to one of tutors in 1829 that he wished he hadn’t been born into it.
- “not strong character’
- More emphathetic and liberal.
- Travelled Russia and witnesssed backwardsness - 1837 visited 300 provances.
Emancipation of the Serfs
The Russian peasant
- 85% pop, 50% serfs.
- Rapid pop growth not matched with rapid productivity.
- “head of our domestic problems which we must tackle stands…the question of serfdom.” - Samarin, prominent Slavophile.
Emancipation of the Serfs
State peasants
Degrees of freedom, 1937 - able to own land
Emancipation of the Serfs
Serf’s life
- Lived dominated by Mir.
- Only action not avalible to owners = murder.
1. Obrok - paid rent and very mistreated.
2. Barishina paid in labour
Emancipation of the Serfs
Emancipation edict 1861
- Right of bondage forever abolished.
- Only applied to privately owned - state serfs freed 1866.
- Freed serfs to pay repemption payments, felt cheated.
- Landowners recieved compensation - nobility felt cheated as they lost land.
- 15% remained temporarily obligated until 1881.
Emancipation of the Serfs
Concequences for Tsar
- People critical of his actions, calls for a contitution.
- 647 peasant riots 1st 4 months of ‘61.
Emancipation of the serfs
Other concequences
- Nobility demanded political power in return for loss of serfs.
- 1861 - 1/4 farmers not self-efficient, 1900 - 1/2.
- 51 mil freed.
- Great origin for rev/opp groups.
- Landowners 115K to 107k.
- Land owned 200mil - 144mil acres.
Military reforms 1869-81
Reforms
- Conscription compolsory and reduced 25 to 15 years (plus 10 reserve).
- Abolished military colonies.
- Bettermed care.
- Military colleges = better training, punishments less servere.
Military reforms 1869-81
Effects
- Army = smaller and better trained.
- More money saved by gov.
- Quality of training improved.
Military reforms 1869-81
Limitations
- Opposed by nobility.
- Many didn’t want complusory service.
- Still relied on peasants = training ineffective.
- slow process of introducing new weapons.
Military reforms 1869-81
Motives
- Crimean war loss.
- Took up 1/3 gov expenditure + 45% spending.
- Poorly trained and unsucsessful.
Local gov reforms 1964
Motives
- Governers had no defined role.
- Lack of co-ordination (only 100,000 docs issued anually)
- Few personal staff to admin whole country.
- 50 occasions of peasant unrest each year.
Local gov reforms 1964
Reforms
- Zemstva established.
- to be elected by nobels
- town dwellers and peasant councils had general responsiblities for health, education, and infastructure.
Local gov reforms 1964
Effects
- Zemstva brought improvements to roads, healthcare, schools + developed transport.
- Nobels and councils gained political experience and many wanted to see if could be taken to national level.
- Members of professional third level began to make demands for social reform and living conditions.