1.B - what is the relationship between patterns of international migration and socio-economic development Flashcards
value of migrant remittances definition
money transferred from 1 country to another, sent home by migrants to their family, friends and community
human development index definition
- development is measured according to the UN’s HDI
- a composite index incorporating social and economic indices for life expectancy, education and GDP per capita
- 0-1 scale (1 most devp)
suggest one benefit and one drawback of a country having large levels of migrant remittances
CON:
- money is being sent away rather than invested into the host country’s economy. LIDC will lose well educated people (brain drain).
- if theres a change in policy then the link stops. its unreliable for the LIDC to make money in this way.
PRO:
- a less developed country is gaining more money and having to do nothing for it. can help them develop. benefitting from another country’s economic development
what relationship would you expect to find between level of socio-economic devp and patterns of migration?
- people move towards areas of higher socio-economic development
- the more developed you are, the less migrant remittances
what is the blue banana?
- the economic heartland (therefore expect migrants to flood here)
- manchester to milan, discontinous corridor of urbanisation central europe
why is a scatter graph an appropriate way to display data?
- able to see positive/negative correlations
- shows a clear relationship between the 2
what does the spearman’s rank test show?
- shows correlation between 2 continuous data sets
- tells us if a correlation is statistically significant or not
- tells us if relationship is by chance or a correlation
to what extent is there a relationship between socio-economic development and migration patterns within the EU?
- developing countries attract more migrants due to ↑ opportunities
- big cities = high industrial development
- ↑ development = ↓ GDP from remittances
YES:
- blue banana - main areas in Europe people want to migrate to (↑ population density - 110m people)
- HDI ↑ as GDP remittances ↓
- ↑GDP = ↑ immigrants (more economically developed)
NO:
- barriers more significant in determining patterns
- free movement lacus
- large flows of ideas
- closer together
- no strict borders
flows of people in global migration
- people migrating = immigration and emigration
- refugees
- economic migrants
- asylum seekers
- students
flows of ideas in global migration
- student migrants return to source country with degrees
- migrants create networks (communities within destination) which create flows of skills, financial resources, values and ideas through their links to association including professional, business, religious and social network
- values such as democracy and other norms of behaviour can flow from one country to another through use of social media and when migrants return
- multiculturalism
- globalisation/westernisation of culture (negative)
- variety of businesses e.g. food and cultural variety
- social remittances (e.g. ideas on family size, education and marriage) information on migrant reception and progress at the destination can be useful for prospective migrants
flows of money in global migration
- bilateral relationship = aid
- countries that send migrant remittances:
> US - $131bn
> Saudi Arabi - $45bn - countries that depend upon MR:
> Honduras $4.3bn
> Nepal $6.9bn - billions of dollars sent worldwide
flows of technology in global migration
- border control and regulating migration
- “brain gain”
- better bank transfers to send money overseas
- use of smartphones and social media:
> communication
> IDP Vulnerability Assessment. surveys using smartphones uploaded to an online database designed for automated analysis of around 400,000 urban IDPs so most vulnerable can be targeted for assistance
IMPACTS of flows of migration:
impact of growth on the source country
- remittances, sent home by migrants, contribute as much as 25% of a country’s GDP e.g. Nepal 28%
- migrant remittances stimulate multiplier effect in home regions - Opole region in Poland gets 25% of its spending from MR
- technology, through bank transfers and the use of smartphones makes transfer of remittances more secure
IMPACTS of flows of migration:
impact of growth on the host country
- migrants are consumers in their host countries so create a new market and boost spending. they may create new specialist businesses e.g. Polish shops
- migrants boost populations in regions of population decrease such as central France/Portugal
- they buy properties and help keep economy going
- often do work that locals won’t do and therefore support businesses e.g. service industries in Southern California
- the GDP and tax base of the host country are boosted by immigration
- migrants fill gaps in labour market/↓ skills shortages. e.g. Norfolk, farmers rely on seasonal migrant labour
IMPACTS of flows of migration:
impact of stability on the source country
- flows of info via social media and phones mean asylum seekers find maps of best routes and safe areas to stay
- international migration can limit internal rural-urban migration and the pressures this puts on rapidly growing urban areas e.g. Indians -> Dubai