19. conflicting depth cues Flashcards
What does the perceptual system do when there are conflicting depth cues? What usually happens?
- perceptual system assumes ALL cues are right
- tries to figure out what could be going on in the world to make the depth cues reasonable
- often can lead to illusions
4 types of illusions caused by resolution of conflicting depth cues?
- Hollow mask
- Arch illusion
- Anaglyph movement
- Ames window (rotating trapezoid)
Hollow mask illusion –> What is it? What do you perceive? (How is it ultimately resolved)
- you’re looking at a hollow mask
- you perceive a normal protruding face, but when you move, it turns to follow you
Hollow mask illusion –> what depth cues are there? Which are wrong vs. right?
Wrong:
1. Familiarity with faces –> assume nose is close
2. Shape from shading –> hollow mask lit from below puts highlight on forehead, which is how a protruding face lit from above would appear
Right:
1. motion parallax –> the nose is farthest, so it moves slower than the other aspects that are closer
Arch illusion –> what is it? What COULD someone perceive?
- St. louis arch is shown with limited AMBIGUOUS depth information
- top of the arch is cut off
- people are equally likely to perceive either “leg” as closest
Arch illusion –> if you were moving in a helicopter, with limited depth information, and the top of the arch occluded, what COULD you see?
- like the hollow face illusion, IF you perceived the depth INCORRECTLY originally, you’d perceive motion in the opposite direction
Anaglyph movement illusion –> what is it? ex from class? what depth cue is wrong vs right?
-
binocular disparity gives illusion of depth (some words look closer than others)
–> disparity is wrong!
–> diff. colors adjusted 6cm apart - motion parallax info (right) tells you that none of the words are actually closer
- you PERCEIVE some of the words as MOVING
ex. “REAL 3D” in red and yellow
Ames window (rotating trapezoid w/pen) –> what is it? what depth cues are right vs wrong? what do you perceive?
- trapezoidal window (one side smaller than the other) with pen attached sticking through the window
- Wrong: linear perspective and relative size
–> you think shorter segment is always further away - Right: motion parallax (caused by object moving)
- you perceive the window as flip flopping, while the pen is fully rotating and moving “through” the window (resolution)
In all illusions with conflicting depth cues, what was the 2nd cue, which was correct/reliable?
- motion parallax