1.6 Education - Role of Education Flashcards
ROLE OF EDUCATION: FUNCTIONALIST: SUMMARY
Society is held together by a shared culture or value consensus.
Functionalists use the organic analogy to help explain this relationship – everything must work together to prevent anomie from occurring.
ROLE OF EDUCATION: FUNCTIONALIST: CREATING SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: Durkheim
Members must feel part of a single ‘body’ or community. Without it cooperation would be impossible.
Transmitting society’s culture – shared beliefs and values – from one generation to the next. E.g. teaching a child about their country’s history instils a sense of shared heritage and commitment to a wider social group.
School therefore acts as a ‘society on miniature’ preparing us for life in wider society.
ROLE OF EDUCATION: FUNCTIONALIST: TEACHING SPECIALIST SKILLS: Durkheim
In modern industrial societies there is a very complex division of labour within the workplace, this means a workforce with a multitude of very specialist skills is required. Durkheim argues school teaches individuals specialist knowledge that they need to play their part in the social division of labour.
ROLE OF EDUCATION: FUNCTIONALIST: FOCAL SOCIALISING AGENCY: Parsons
Parsons – builds on the work of Durkheim and suggests school is a ‘focal socialising agency’,
it bridges the gap between home and wider society. In order to be successful in wider society different skills are required than those taught in the home – school does this
ROLE OF EDUCATION: FUNCTIONALIST: PARTICULARISTIC STANDARDS: Parsons
Family – children are judged by particularistic standards – only apply to that child. Child’s status is also ascribed, fixed by birth e.g. an older boy may have more rights than his younger sister
ROLE OF EDUCATION: FUNCTIONALIST: UNIVERSALISTIC STANDARDS: Parsons
School – and wider society judge us all by the same universalistic standards that are impersonal e.g. the same laws apply to everyone and in schools all children are judged against the same standards (same exam). Status is largely achieved e.g. we pass or fail based on our efforts, get a promotion based on hard work.
ROLE OF EDUCATION: FUNCTIONALIST: MERITOCRACY: Parsons
Parsons and MERTIOCRACY
Parsons sees school as preparing us to move from the family to wider society because both school and wider society are based on meritocratic principles. In a meritocracy we all have the same access to opportunity and you are rewarded through your own efforts and ability.
ROLE OF EDUCATION: FUNCTIONALIST: ROLE ALLOCATION: Davis and Moore
Functionalists also, Davis and Moore build on the idea that education supports society through role allocation. In a complex modern society we need school to help ‘sift and sort’ pupils into roles best suited for their aptitude and ability.
They argue inequality is inevitable as not everyone is equally talented and should therefore not be rewarded as highly in pay. E.g. it would be irresponsible to let less able people become surgeons and pilots. By keeping these wages high it will attract more people and then the best possible people can be selected. A modern economy prospers due to its ‘human capital’ – its workers skills. A meritocratic education system is best in supporting this as it allows for people to be allocated to jobs best suited to them.
ROLE OF EDUCATION: FUNCTIONALIST: AO3
The education system does not teach specialist skills adequately, the Wolf Report, 2011 found high quality apprenticeships are rare and up to a third of 16-19 year olds are on courses that do not lead to higher education or good jobs.
In the topics we have already studied there is ample evidence to suggest that equality of opportunity does not exist and that meritocracy could in fact be a myth. E.g. achievement is greatly influenced by class rather than ability.
Tumin criticise Davis and Moore for putting forward a circular argument. How do we know a job is important? Answer is because it is paid well. Why are some jobs paid well? Answer is because they are important.
Functionalists argue education instils shared harmony and consensus through shared values, Marxists would argue they are not shared values but ideology imposed by the minority dominant class.
Interactionists would argue that Functionalists assume we are all passive puppets and do not acknowledge that pupils do not always accept what they are taught and sometimes reject the schools values.
Neoliberals and the New Right argue that the state education systems fails to properly prepare young people for work.
ROLE OF EDUCATION: NEW RIGHT/NEOLIBERAL: SUMMARY
Neoliberalism is an economic doctrine that has had a major influence on educational policy. They argue that the state should not provide services like education, welfare etc. Instead a free-market should operate where competition is present in order to drive up standards. They believe education should help the country compete in the global market place.
The New Right
Is a conservative political view that incorporates neoliberal ideas. The New Right believe the state cannot possibly meet the needs of its people, therefore the people are best left to meet their own needs in a free market and so favour the marketisation of education.
ROLE OF EDUCATION: NEW RIGHT/NEOLIBERAL: SIMILAR TO FUNCTIONALISM
: They are somewhat similar to functionalists in that:
1. Both believe that some people are naturally more talented than others
2. Both favour meritocratic principles
3. Education should serve the needs of the economy by preparing young people for work
4. Both believe education should socialise pupils into shared values such as competition and instil a sense of national identity
ROLE OF EDUCATION: NEW RIGHT/NEOLIBERAL: DIFFERENT TO FUNCTIONALISM
AO3: BUT…
A difference with functionalism is that the New Right do not believe that current education system is working, they believe this is because it is run by the state.
1. It takes a ‘one size fits all’ approach which disregards local need
2. They are unresponsive and inefficient
3. Schools that waste money and do not get good
results are not answerable to the consumer – this results in low standards and a less qualified workforce
THE SOLUTION is the marketisation of education – create an education market where competition between schools give choice to the consumer and drives up standards.
ROLE OF EDUCATION: NEW RIGHT/NEOLIBERAL: Chubb and Moe
they believe that state run education in America has failed because it has not created equal opportunity and failed disadvantaged groups.
In research conducted by them on 60,000 pupils from low income families in 1015 state and private schools they found pupils from low income families do about 5% better in private than state schools.
Based on this they believe that a free market system within state education should be introduced in order to give the consumers (parents) the control. This would allow consumers to shape schools to meet their own needs which in turn would drive up standards.
Chubb and Moe propose a voucher system where each family would be given a voucher to ‘spend’ on their child’s education, schools would be forced to compete to try to attract ‘consumers’ as this would be the schools main source of income.
Their principles are already at work in the private education sector.
ROLE OF EDUCATION: NEW RIGHT/NEOLIBERAL: ROLE OF STATE
Whilst the New Right believe the less state interference the better they do believe that the state should have two key roles:
1. Impose a framework on schools within which you have to compete e.g. by publishing Ofsted reports and league tables – this gives parents the information to make a more informed choice.
2. The state should ensure that schools transmit a shared culture, e.g. by imposing a single national curriculum it ensures schools socialise pupils into a single cultural heritage.
Education should affirm national identity e.g. should impose Britain’s positive role in world history
Education should teach British literature and there should be a Christian act of worship – national religion
They therefore oppose multicultural education that reflects the cultures of different minority groups
ROLE OF EDUCATION: NEW RIGHT/NEOLIBERAL: AO3
Gerwitz and Ball both argue competition between schools benefits the middle classes as they have the cultural and economic capital to gain access to the best schools.
Critics argue that the real cause of low educational standards is not state control but social inequality and inadequate funding of state schools.
There is contradiction in the New Right supporting parental choice (parentocracy) on one hand and then imposing a National Curriculum on schools on the other (which involves no choice).
Marxists would argue that education does not impose a shared national culture but a culture imposed by the dominant minority ruling class and devalues the culture of working class and ethnic minorities.