12. PTSD Flashcards

1
Q

PTSD criterion A

A

the person was exposed to the following: death, threatened death, actual or threatened serious injury, actual or threatened sexual violation in one or more of the following:
- experiencing the event themself
- witnessing
- learning the event occurred to a close relative/friend
- experiencing repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details of event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

PTSD criterion B

A

intrusion symptoms associated with traumatic event, began after event, evidenced by one or more of:
recurrent involuntary intrusive distressing memories of traumative event
recurrent distressing dreams in which content or affect is related
dissociative reactions (flashbacks) where they feel or act as if the traumatic event were occurring
intense or prolonged psychological distress at exposure to internal or external cues that symbolise or resemble an aspect of the event
marked physiological reactions to reminders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PTSD criterion C and D

A

C: persistent avoidance of associated stimuli and numbing general responsiveness not present before trauma, indicated by three or more of:
efforts to avoid thoughts, feeleings, conversations associated
efforts to avoid activies, people or places associated

D: negative alternations in cognition and mood that began or worsened after the event, evidenced by 2 or more of:
inability to remember important aspect of traumatic event (dissociative amnesia, not due to head injury, drugs, etx. )
persistent and exaggerated negative expectations about self others and world
persistent distorted blame of self or others about the cause or consequences of traumatic event
pervasive negative emotional state
diminished interest in activities
detachment and estrangement from others
inability to experience positive emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

PTSD criterions E and F

A

E. Alterations in arousal and reactivity as evidenced by three or more of:
irritable, angry, aggressive
self destructive, reckless
hypervigilance
exaggerated startle response
problems with concentration
sleep disturbance

F. Duration > 1 MO

G. significant distress

H. Not attributable to physiological effects of substance/medical condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

PTSD Specifiers

A

with dissociative symptoms:
- depersonalisation
- derealisation
neither due to substance or medical condition

with delayed expression: full diagnostic criteria not met until 6MO later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

depersonalisation

A

persistent or recurrent experiences of feeling detached from, and as if one were an ourside observer of one’s mental process or bodye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

derealisation

A

persistent or recurrent experiences of unreality of surroundings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ASD DSM 5

A

A. exposure to actual or threatened death, injury, sexual violation in same ways as PTSD
Presence of 9 or more of the symptoms from any of the five categories of intrusion, negative mood, dissociation, avoidance and arousal, beginning or worsening after the traumatic event occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

pre-trauma risk factors PTSD

A

tendency towards anxiety and depression
prior psychiatric history
prior trauma history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

PTSD peri-trauma risk factors

A

level of exposure to trauma both real and perceived
degree of life threat, exposure to others suffering etc.
predictability and controllability
peritraumatic dissociation and arousal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PTSD post trauma risk factors

A

stressful life events
level of social support: validation of experience, opportunities to process the trauma, more balanced appraisals of self and world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

assessment

A

pre traumatic history
family history
traumatic scenario
post trauma scenario
MSE (particularly any disparity between thought content and affective response during interview
Psychometric assessments: clinician administered interviews (most preferred); trauma specific self report measures; psychophysiological assessment
Forensic assessment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

theoretical rationale important

A

promotes compliance and sense of control over the exposure in particular

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

theoretical rationale

A

normalcy of anxiety and stress response- state that what the clients first felt after trauma was a normal reaction to an un-normal event. But these feelings are now causing much distress and interfering in their day to day functioning
Adaptive functions of anxiety- alerting signal of unknown, vague or conflictual threat
biological basis of the anxiety response: perceived threat - ANS arousal via nerve fibres, SNS releases adrenaline and noradrenaline powering up body, then results in somatic changes. Physical sensations related to FFF. Anxiety overload- body can’t keep increasing anxieyt because other enzumes eventually break down adrenaline and destroy it; PSNS kicks in for homeostasis of adrenalinee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explanation of treatment rationale for PTSD and anxiety

A

3 major components of anxiety
physical: recognise the forms it takes and identify tension building up in body. once this has been achieved, can control sensations before they become excessive and use strategies to reduce them
Mental: recognising unadaptive and self deefeating thinking important in gaining control over them and mastering the situation
Behavioural: by identifying avoidance reactions and practicing new ways of responding you will have less restrictive life

“therefore we will be discovering new coping strategies for the way you think when under stress and putting unwanted thoughts out of your ming, what you do to control the stress and new methods of reacting to situations that you presently avoid”

then may explain Mowrer’s two factor theory but only if client able to follow: credibility check or intellectualisation aspect to avoidance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mowrer’s two factor theory stage 1

A

cc
UCS of accident and NS of driving car cause UCR of fear, but then CS of driving car generalises to NS of being in vehicle to cause CR of fear

17
Q

Mowrers two factor theory stage 2

A

OC
Avoiding the arousal inducing setting reduces arousal, negatively reinforicng avoidance/escape

18
Q

Analogies to understand basis of PTSD

A

trauma box analogy
digestion analogy

18
Q

exposure in vivo

A

client instrumental at all stages
any situation does not pose real threat
situations related to trauma
doable hierarchy
begin at level high enough to derive anxiety but not likely to fail
client has coping strategies
stays in scenario for 40-50 mins or until anxiety significantly dropped
therapist reviews performance, reinforce positives, problem solve difficulties

18
Q

Imaginal exposure

A

sit in chair and close eyes, recall vividly in present tense as if happening right now
tape it to listen at home
may need to normalise trauma situation first due to embarassment
maintain same SUD points every time, minimum of between 50-70 at first session
continue with scene for approximately 60 mins, until SUDs decreased and habituation occurred

19
Q

exposure- common problems

A

lack of trust in therpaist
dissociative tendencies (keep them grounded, sounds or touch arm with permission)
lack of affective involvement- use prompts
anxiety didn’t drop
too much anxiety- grounding, train analogy, not happening in reality. use thought stopping at end of session and make sure client not leaving aroused.

20
Q

Imaginal exposure homework tape

A

listen to tape once daily
put on exposure hierarchy
not in bed

21
Q

Cognitive intervention stage 1

A

introduce beck/ellis cognitive restructuring: ABC focusing on how thoughts affect reactions
initially begin with non trauma related A, then move on to trauma related A and B, then allow client to do an example alone

22
Q

Cognitive intervention stage 2

A

disucssion and behavioural experiment
challenge their assumptions and play devils advocate (explain that you will do this to client)
second phase is to show that even if what they think might happen does happen, the outcome would not be as bad as they probably imagine.
while ABC may lead people to know something is untrue, behavioural experiments lead people to actually beleive it

23
Q

Cognitive intervention stage 3

A

cognitive interweave
stay with the scene during imaginal exposure, challenge faulty beliefs and assumptions, test beliefs with reruns if necessary, make a tape for homework

24
Q

method of teaching coping skills

A

education and explanation
demonstrate
apply
review

25
Q

stress inoculation techniques

A

breathing
deep muscle relaxation
thought stopping
guided self dialogue

26
Q

guided self dialogue

A

faulty self defeating and negative self talk is replaced with more rational, facilitative and task enhancing dialogue
preparation
confrontation and management
coping
reviewing and reinforcing

27
Q

PTSD assessment examples

A

STAI state and trait
BDI
DASS
GHQ
IES-R: measures hyper arousal
MPTSD (combat): depression and trauma
PTSD-I
PSS-SR

28
Q
A