1.1: Democracy and participation Flashcards
What is Democracy?
DEMOCRACY
- A political system by which the people are involved in decision making in some way (either directly or indirectly).
- Founded in Greece and means ‘rule by the people’.
- The UK’s progression towards full democracy can be traced to the Magna Carta (1215) as well as the Anglo-Saxon ‘Witan’.
- There are two types of democracy:
1. Direct Democracy
2. Representative Democracy
What is Direct Democracy?
DIRECT DEMOCRACY
- A political system whereby all individuals express their opinions themselves and not through representatives acting on their behalf.
a) Individuals take part themselves in the running of the country and deciding laws by expressing their opinions themselves such as a referendum.
- This is consultative and participatory.
b) Originated in ancient Athens, where adult male citizens had the right to take part in decision-making at public meetings.
- Yet such a system would be impractical as a regular means of decision making in a large modern state.
- Citizens are more active and involved in decision making.
What is Representative Democracy?
REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY
- A more modern form of democracy through which an individual elects a representative (and/or political party) to act on their behalf to exercise political choice.
a) This is the usual form of democracy in the modern world.
b) Representatives do not act as delegates (a person sent or authorised to represent others, in particular, an elected representative sent to a conference), but act as trustees merely taking instructions from voters and expected to exercise their judgement.
c) If they do not satisfy voters, they can be held accountable and removed.
- This means voters can retain sovereignty as they can decide whether or not to renew the mandate of their representatives.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of Direct Democracy?
DIRECT DEMOCRACY
- Advantages
a) Gives equal weight to all votes, while the representative system has varying sizes of constituencies meaning no equal vote.
b) Encourages popular participation in politics as expectations of people taking their duties as citizens seriously.
c) Removes the need for trusted representatives, as people take responsibility for their own decisions.
d) Develops a sense of community and encourages genuine debate as well as a voice instead of being in disagreement with the election of an MP for 5 years. - Disadvantages
a) Impractical in large, densely populated modern states with complicated decision making and can prove to be expensive.
b) Many people opt out and do not feel qualified to participate in decision making - so political activists decide what happens.
c) Open to manipulation by the cleverest/articulate speaker to persuade people to support their viewpoint.
d) Parliamentary institutions do not mediate the will of the majority, so minority views are disregarded and many may feel neglected in this circumstance.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of Representative Democracy?
REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY
- Advantages
a) Politicians from parties, bringing coherence and giving people a real choice of representatives. Pressure groups form to represent different interests, prompting debate, encouraging pluralist democracy.
b) Politicians are in theory better informed than the average citizen about the many issues on which they have a view.
c) The only practical system in a large modern state, where issues are complex and often need a rapid response (such as invasion).
d) Elections allow people to hold representatives to account.
- Allows the electorate to renew the mandate of their representatives.
e) Reduces chances of minority rights being overridden by the ‘tyranny of the majority’.
- This is where the majority can use their votes to dominate or even oppress minority views. - Disadvantages
a) Politicians may be corrupt and incompetent, may betray election promises or put loyalty to their party before their responsibility to the electorate.
- Many MPs are disengaged from the public and do not adequately represent voters interests.
b) Parties and pressure groups can be run by elites pursuing their own agendas, not genuinely representing the people.
- Westminister ‘bubble’ disconnects the voters from their representatives.
c) Minorities may still find themselves underrepresented as politicians are likely to follow the views of the majority to win.
- Due to the FPTP system, major parties are overrepresented.
- The social make-up of Parliament is also still primarily white, male and middle class.
- In the 2017 general election, out of the 650 MPs, 8% are from ethnic minorities, 32% are female and 7% are LGBT+.
d) Politicians are skilful at avoiding accountability, even when 5 years apart.
- Some institutions, such as the House of Lords, are unelected and therefore unaccountable.
e) May lead to reduced participation as people hand responsibility to politicians.
f) Many MPs have outside interests, including second jobs which can further contribute to a conflict of interest and compromise their ability to represent.
- EXAMPLE. George Osborne became editor of the Evening Standard while still an MP.
What are the instances where direct democracy is used within a representative system?
DIRECT DEMOCRACY WITHIN A REPRESENTATIVE SYSTEM
- National Referendums
a) A referendum is a direct vote on a single issue, usually requiring a response to a straight yes/no question.
b) They are not legally binding, meaning the government can ignore the results because the parliament is sovereign.
c) The UK has had only three nationwide referendums:
- Britain’s membership of the European Economic Community (European Union) in 1975 and 2016.
- AV referendum in 2011. - Electronic Petitions
a) If a petition on the government website reaches 100,000 signatures it will be considered for debate in the House of Commons.
- This does not mean that legislation will have to be forthcoming.
b) As a result of e-petitions, Parliament has had to engage with the electorate.
- EXAMPLE. There were 2 votes of no-confidence in Jeremy Hunt as health secretary in 2015 and 2016.
- EXAMPLE. Meningitis B vaccination is to be given to all children after 830,000 signed the e-petition in 2016.
- EXAMPLE. A debate for a second referendum on whether the UK should leave the EU after 4 million people signed the e-petition. - Consultative Exercise
a) These can be set up when governing bodies want to assess the likely reaction to their proposed policies.
b) These provide an important way of engaging with the public on issues that directly affect them
- Since it is a consultative exercise, what the public says is not binding and the effectiveness of the exercise will depend on how representative the survey is.
c) EXAMPLE. Communities which will be affected have been consulted over the expansion of Heathrow and the HS2 rail link in 2018. - Open Primaries
a) A small number of constituencies have opted to select Parliamentary candidates through open primaries, in which the public directly decides whom the candidate should be.
b) Open primaries provide people with direct influence over whom the candidates for political office will be.
- This is a traditional part of democracy in the USA, enabling people from outside party politics, such as Donald Trump, to be elected.
- Whether or not this is a positive development divides opinion.
c) EXAMPLE. The independent MP Sarah Wollaston became the Conservative Candidate for Totnes in 2009 when she won an open primary. - Election of the leadership of Political Parties
a) All the main political parties allow their membership to decide whom the leader of their party will be.
- This is a significant power since it may determine who the PM will be.
b) Supporters argue that this makes the leadership accountable to the whole party.
- Important as the labour party sees itself as a political party and popular movement.
- But this may give too much influence to activists, who are often more radical than the electorate.
c) EXAMPLE. In 2015, Jeremy Corbyn was elected leader of the Labour Party with 59.9% of the vote and reelected in 2016 by 61.4%. - The 2015 Recall of MP’s Act
a) This allows a petition to be triggered if an MP is sentenced to be imprisoned or is suspended from the House of Commons for more than 21 days.
- If 10% of eligible voters in the constituency sign the petition, a by-election is called. Direct democracy is thus used to hold representatives to account.
b) EXAMPLE. In 2018, Ian Paisley Junior survived a recall petition for not declaring 2 family holidays paid for by the Sri Lankan Government.
- Only 9.4% of constituents signed this petition.
What is the difference between Pluralist and Elitist Democracy?
PLURALIST DEMOCRACY
- A type of democracy in which a government makes decisions as a result of the interplay of various ideas and contrasting arguments from competing groups and different interest groups/organisation.
ELITIST SYSTEM
- Where one group dominates and make most of the decisions.
What is Sovereignty and the 2 different types?
SOVEREIGNTY
- Power the government holds to make or change laws.
- Parliamentary Sovereignty
- Makes Parliament the supreme legal authority which can create or end any law. Courts cannot overrule its legislation and no Parliaments cannot pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change. - Popular Sovereignty
- The idea that power is vested in the people and that those chosen to govern, as trustees (permitted by voters to make decisions) of such power must exercise it in conformity with the general will of the people.
What is meant by a Democratic Deficit?
DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT
- The Government derives its legitimacy from the consent of the people. Democracy validates the policies of those who exercise power.
a) Legitimacy is the legal right to exercise power, with the universal acceptance by the people that an institution should hold power and responsibility (e.g right to rule after an election).
b) However, there are concerns that the UK is suffering from a ‘democratic deficit’ as decisions are taken by people whose appointment lacks adequate democratic input or are not subject to proper accountability.
- Democratic Deficit = A flaw in the democratic process where decisions are taken by people who lack legitimacy, not having been appointed with sufficient democratic input or subject to accountability. Institutions and their decision-making procedures suffer from a lack of democracy and seem inaccessible to the ordinary citizen due to their complexity.
What are the positives and negatives of the UK Political System?
UK POLITICAL SYSTEM
- Positives
a) Devolved Governments
- Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and elected mayors for London and other English cities, enabling more local decisions.
b) Independent judiciary
- Upholds the rule of law and protects a wide range of personal freedoms.
c) Free media
- Challenges government policy and exposes the misdeeds of politicians.
d) Free and fair elections
- Mostly free of corruption and intimidation, in recent years supplemented in opportunities to vote in referendums.
e) A wide range of political parties and pressure groups
- With many people belonging to. - Negatives
a) Underrepresentation of minority viewpoint due to the voting system
- As the Commons are elected by first past the post’ system, which produces a mismatch between votes cast and seats won.
b) House of Lord’s lacks legitimacy
- It’s unelected yet through appointment, with endeavours to alter system are limited with the partial exception of (Independent House of Lords Appointments Commission) to ensure different professions and experience are present - but lacks democratic legitimacy.
c) Lacks protection for citizens rights
- Human Rights Act is inadequate as governments can suspend articles of the Act in certain situations.
d) Control of sections of the media for powerful business interests
- The Murdoch group has owned many British newspapers (The Times…).
Is there a participation crisis in the UK?
PARTICIPATION CRISIS
- A lack of engagement by a significant number of citizens to relate to the political process either by choosing not to vote or to join or become members of political parties or to offer themselves for public office.
- Is there a Participation Crisis?
a) Average turnout at general elections from 1945 to 1997 was 76%.
- EXAMPLE. Yet in recent years it has been between 59% to 62%, the younger generation bears the lowest turnout.
b) When the governing party seems sure of success at the polls, turnout is low.
- EXAMPLE. In 2001, when it seemed Tony Blair had an easy victory against William Hague’s and his lack of popular enthusiasm, turnout was just 59.4%.
c) ‘Second-order’ elections in devolved Parliaments have low turnouts as they are seen as less powerful and therefore unlikely to make a major difference in people lives.
- EXAMPLE. The Welsh Assembly had a turn out of 45.3% in 2016.
d) Local elections attract poor turnouts - 33.8%.
- A sign of Political Apathy.
- EXAMPLE. In Stoke On Trent in February 2017 the By-Elections with had a 38.2% turnout.
e) Participation depends on the issues at stake.
- EXAMPLE. Turnout for the Scottish Referendum in September 2014 was 84.6% while 72.2% took part in the 2016 EU Referendum.
- EXAMPLE. When the opposition in 1983, 2017 and 2019 was radical socialist, voting declined by 4%.
f) Membership of political parties changes.
- EXAMPLE. The Conservative Party has shrunk from 400,000 in the mid-1990s to 124,000 by 2018.
- EXAMPLE. Labour Party membership has increased from 190,000 in Tony Blair’s reign to 552,000 in 2018 under Jeremy Corbyn due to grassroots enthusiasm for Corbyn (momentum) and the introduction of Ed Milliband ‘one member, one vote’.
g) There has been distrust in politicians and voter apathy.
- EXAMPLE. In 2009, The Daily Telegraph published widespread evidence of abuse to the system that allowed MP’s to claim expenses for living costs which led to a compilation of apologies, repayments and even 5 MP’s and 2 House of Lords members being sentenced to prison terms.
- EXAMPLE. In 2016, Ipsos MORI recorded that only 21% of the population trusted Politicians.
h) EXAMPLE. Comparison of turnouts at other elections in 2017.
- Dutch General Election = 81.9%.
- German Federal Election = 76.2%.
- British General Election = 68.6%.
- USA Presidential Election = 55.7%. - There hasn’t been a participation crisis
a) EXAMPLE. Some general elections do inspire high levels of turnout.
- 1964, Harold Wilson’s dynamic campaign aimed at ending ‘13 wasted years’ of Conservative rule (77.1% turnout).
- February 1974, The ‘Who Governs Britain?’ crisis general election called by Edward Heath (78.8% turnout).
- 1979, Margaret Thatcher challenging James Callaghan in the wake of the ‘Winter of Discontent’ (76% turnout).
- 1992, John Major’s soapbox campaign against Labour’s Neil Kinnock (77.7% turnout).
b) Yet, although democratic participation has decreased in the sign of voting, it could be suggested that direct action has been more recognised in modern-day politics as well as social media allowing e-democracy through e-petitions where you can register your viewpoint online. This new political engagement.
What is Political Apathy?
POLITICAL APATHY
- Lack of interest, enthusiasm, or concern towards political matters.
What are proposals for reform of UK Democracy?
REFORM OF UK DEMOCRACY
1. Voting Rules.
a) Changing election day from Thursday to Sunday, as in mainland Europe.
b) Allowing people to vote anywhere in their constituency rather than insisting on attendance at a particular polling station.
c) Allowing voting over several days or via postal voting
e-voting (online).
d) Reduce voting age from 18 to 16 (allowed in the Scottish Referendum).
e) Making voting compulsory (failure to turn up leads to a fine).
f) Allowing prisoners the vote.
- Further Devolution
a) Giving people greater self-determination by voting on a localised level.
b) May not ensure enthusiasm.
- EXAMPLE. 78% of voters voted against a North-East assembly in 2004.
c) Elected mayoral elections have a low turnout.
- EXAMPLE. London Mayor 2016 = 45.3% turnout.
- EXAMPLE. Manchester Mayor 2016 = 29.9% turnout. - Power of Recall
a) Recall of MPs Act was passed in 2015, enabling voters to trigger a by-election if 10% of them sign a petition.
b) Only can happen if they are sentenced to prison or suspended from the House of Commons for at least 21 days.
- By broadening the criteria, this could give constituents considerably more power.
- EXAMPLE. In the USA, 18 states have recall provisions and in 2003, the governor of California, Gray Davis was recalled over his failure to balance the budget. - House of Lords Reform
a) The House of Lords is unelected and unaccountable.
- Its membership is. selected through political patronage.
- EXAMPLE. In 2016, David Cameron appointed 13 peers from among his political allies.
b) However, although an elected chamber would make them democratically accountable, there is a danger that they could rival the Commons, creating constitutional gridlock. - Digital Democracy
a) By facilitating voting and encouraging electronic political discussion, it will encourage greater political engagement and higher turnout.
b) Is problematic as:
- Voting on your mobile phone at your convenience would mean that voting was no longer carried out in secret, so the possibility of voter manipulation would increase.
- Allegations of cyber-interference in Western elections by Russia indicates that electronic voting is more open to fraud.
- The way in which Politicians use twitter can encourage populist sloganeering.
- The standard of debate on social media indicates that activists can use this as much to bully as to engage in considered debate. - Electronic Petitions
a) By making e-petitions more powerful, by making them automatically triggering a Parliamentary vote would make Parliament more accountable.
b) However, this could bog Westminister down in unconstitutional and impractical debates.
- EXAMPLE. Some of the most popular e-petitions have called for banning Donald Trump from the UK, which is not even Parliaments right since the responsibility lies with the Home Secretary.
- EXAMPLE. In 2019, an e-petition calling for the UK to stay in the EU gathered over 6.1 million signatures. - Reform of the Westminister electoral system
a) Changing the electoral system on proportional representation (AV), so that it more accurately reflects voters’ preferences, the minority being represented.
- EXAMPLE. In 2011, 67.9% of the electorate voted in favour of not replacing FPTP with AV.
b) Incites issues.
- Proportional representation would make coalition governments more likely, making it difficult for political parties to carry out manifesto commitments.
- EXAMPLE. In the 2017 GE, the highest percentage of the electorate voted Conservative (42.4%) or Labour (40%) in any GE since 1970. This shows that the UK is not exactly a multiparty democracy.
What is Suffrage, and what determines it in the UK?
SUFFRAGE/FRANCHISE
- The ability or right to vote in public elections. Many different factors decide whether or not you have this ability.
- You CAN vote if you’re:
- Over the age of 18.
- Citizens of the UK, Republic of Ireland and Commonwealth citizens.
- UK nationals who have lived overseas for under 15 years. - You CAN’T vote if you’re:
- Under the age of 18
- EU Citizens (except the Republic of Ireland), yet they can vote in local elections.
- Members of the House of Lords (as they have a permanent voice in one of the two houses of parliament).
- Prisoners (Yet this has been challenged by the European Court of Human Rights, yet the Government has decided to ignore it) or those who have been convicted of corruption of illegal electoral practices are barred for five years.
- Those compulsory detained in a psychiatric hospital.
What has been the historical development of franchise in the UK through Acts of Parliament?
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRACY
- Early History of Suffrage (Middle ages to early 19th Century) -
a) Two types of constituency.
- The counties and the boroughs (towns) which varied in size. In the constituency, you could vote if you owned a freehold property worth at least 40 shillings or £2 in value.
- In boroughs there were other conditions based on traditions which varied in different boroughs, such as in some, all freemen were entitled to vote, while in others, it depended on the property or local taxes.
b) Distribution of Parliamentary seats had not kept pace with economic growth and population movement, so older, smaller towns held a historic right to have an MP. While in other a wealthy patron was effectively to nominate an MP.
- While emerging industrial towns were yet to acquire a representative of their own.
c) Plural voting allowed wealthy men who owned property in more than one constituency to have more than one vote and women were excluded from voting.
- Plural Voting = the system or practice of casting more than one vote, or of voting in more than one constituency.
d) This made the electorate 400,000 men by the 19th century. - The Great Reform Act 1832
a) Abolishing the separate representation of the most underpopulated ‘Rotten Boroughs’ and redistributing seats for separate urban areas, such as Manchester
Voting for people such as ‘tenant farmers’ and smaller property holders.
b) Creating a standard qualification for the franchise in all boroughs, so it involved, so it applied to all male householders who lived in properties valued at least £10 per annum, the middle class were growing in importance thanks to the industrial revolution.
c) Increased the electorate to 5% of the adult population. - Reform Act 1867
a) Enfranchised part of the urban male working class in England and Wales for the first time.
- Borough household (tradesmen, shopkeepers) were enfranchised.
b) The Ballot Act 1872 made voting in secrecy compulsory, so protecting citizens right to vote in any way they wish.
c) 13% of the adult population. - Representation of the People Act 1884
a) Rural householders (farmworkers, miners) put on the same footing as borough ones.
b) Established the modern one member constituency in the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885.
c) 25% of the adult population. - Representation of the People Act 1918
a) The Act extended the franchise in parliamentary elections, also known as the right to vote, to men aged over 21, whether or not they owned property, and to women aged over 30.
b) 75% of the adult population. - Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act 1928
a) Widened suffrage by giving women electoral equality with men.
b) 100% of the adult population. - Representation of the People Act 1948
a) Abolishing plural voting.
- This includes the abolition of the twelve separate university constituencies.
b) One person, one vote. - Representation of the People Act 1969
a) Extended suffrage to 18- to 20-year-olds.
b) Reflecting changing attitudes in society about adulthood.
- The opportunities and responsibilities of young people had developed.
- The extension of university education, greater sexual freedom provided by easier access to conception, and the increased earning potential of young people.
What is a rotten borough?
ROTTEN BOROUGH
- A borough/constituency wherein virtually no one can vote, the choice of MP typically being in the hands of one person or family.
What is the historic difference of suffrage between the UK and the USA?
SUFFRAGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN UK AND USA
- Although class, gender and age remained obstacles, ethnicity was never specified as the grounds for exclusion from the franchise.
What is the difference between the Suffragists and Suffragettes?
SUFFRAGIST
- NUWSS (National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies) was formed in 1897 from numerous suffrage societies.
a) Under the leadership of Millicent Fawcett, supported by prominent middle-class women campaigning peacefully for the vote through peaceful demonstrations, petitions and lobbying MP’s to persuade that women deserved the vote
SUFFRAGETTE
- The WSPU (Women’s Social and Political Parties) was formed in 1903 by Emmeline Pankhurst and two of her daughters.
a) It attracted both middle and working classes and used more militant tactics in an aim to attract publicity and put pressure on Parliament through active attacks on well-known institutions, political meetings or prominent male-dominated public activities.
- In 1913, Emily Davison threw herself under the King’s Horse at the Epsom Derby.
b) The motto was ‘Deeds not Words’ wanted to highlight the disparity at a faster rate than NUWSS, yet received both hostility and sympathy to their cause (hunger strike led to force-feeding publicity).
- Actions speak louder than words.
Why were women denied the vote?
DENIED THE VOTE
- Women were denied the vote because:
a) Seen as physically, mentally, emotionally and morally inferior to men.
b) Distrust in voting rationally.
c) Women involved in Politics would neglect their responsibilities at home (raising kids).
d) Public life was seen as the man’s sphere of influence and responsibility.
e) Assumed women didn’t need to vote as husbands and fathers took responsibility.
f) Many prominent women including Queen Victoria agreed to the incapability of understanding politics.
How did suffrage progress for women from 1894?
PROGRESS IN WOMENS SUFFRAGE
- Illogically, women were able to vote in local council elections after the 1894 Local Government Act but not able to vote in parliamentary elections.
a) This was in the view that only men should have a say in National and Imperial matters. - There was a pressure to give all working-class men the vote, in recognition that many who served in the Great War were not householders (no stake in the political system that they were expected to lay their life to).
a) Women were suggestively given the vote due to many being employed in critical industries to contribute to the war effort which successfully raised their self-image and sense of individual identity.
b) This gave women over the age of 30 who were householders, or wives of one, the vote.
- Many felt that the campaign would restart if they didn’t give them the vote.
Should voting be made compulsory?
COMPULSORY VOTING
- Yes
a) Voting is a civic responsibility, like jury service. If citizens are not required to fulfil the duties of citizenship then the principles of civic society are undermined.
- 22 countries have introduced some form of compulsory voting.
- EXAMPLE. Belgium was the first in 1892, in the 2019 federal election, turnout was 88.4%
- EXAMPLE. Australia required citizens to vote in national elections since 1924. In 2019, turnout was 91.9%.
b) Political apathy is a problem in many liberal democracies.
- Limited numbers of people voting can undermine the legitimacy of the result, especially if turnout falls beneath 50%.
- It produces a parliament that is more representative of the whole population.
- EXAMPLE. In the 2016 US Presidential election, just 58% of the electorate voted.
- EXAMPLE. In the 2019 election, turnout was 67.3% (it had been 77.7% in 1992).
c) Those not voting are often ethnic minorities, the poorest in society (DE voters) and young people.
- This means that political decision making often favours older and wealthier voters.
- Compulsory voting would mean that politicians would have to be responsive to all shades of political opinion.
d) Compulsory voting does not have to force people to make a choice.
- EXAMPLE. In Australia, the voter can spoil their ballot if none of the candidates appeals to them. They must, though, attend a polling station.
e) The legal requirement to vote can have an important educative role.
- If people have to vote, they will be more likely to inform themselves of the political choices open to them. - No
a) The public has the right to choose whether or not to vote in an election.
- It is up to politicians to mobilise public enthusiasm by providing reasons to vote.
- Compulsory voting could, therefore, remove the incentive for politicians to engage with the public (undemocratic).
b) The votes of politically disengaged citizens will carry less weight than the votes of those who take their civic responsibilities seriously.
- Random voting could undermine the legitimacy of the result.
c) Compulsory voting is based on coercion, which is alien to the British political system.
- Voting is a civic right but it is not a duty such as the payment of taxes.
d) According to liberal political theory, the extension of the power of the state over the individual ought to be resisted since it limits our right to act in the way we wish.
- The British state has traditionally intervened as little as possible in the liberties of its citizens (National Citizenship Service is voluntary).
e) Not voting can be a positive decision to register dissatisfaction with the candidates or the process (it doesn’t solve reasons as to why people don’t vote).
- EXAMPLE. Only 25% of the electorate voted for police commissioners in 2016, which may indicate that voters regard the post as insignificant.
- Forcing the public to vote for a choice they disagree with is an infringement of civic rights.
What are the arguments for votes at 16?
VOTES AT 16
- Yes
a) At age 16, young people can exercise significant responsibility.
- They can engage in sexual relations, marry, pay tax and join the armed services, so it is irrational that they are regarded as not mature enough to vote.
b) The introduction of citizenship lessons into the school curriculum means that young people are now better informed about current affairs and so can make educated political decisions.
c) National Citizens Service is encouraging young people to have a stake in society, which would be further entrenched by voting at 16.
d) Most local education authorities (LEAs) hold elections for the UK Youth Parliament, which has been praised by politicians such as the speaker of the House (John Bercow) for its positive campaigning.
- EXAMPLE. In 2017, 955,000 young people aged 11 - 18 determined what the Youth Parliament would debate as part of the Make Your Mark Campaign.
e) The 2014 Scottish Independence referendum demonstrated huge engagement by the 16- and 17- year olds.
- EXAMPLE. 75% of this age group voted, and according to Ruth Davidson: ‘the democratic effect turned out to be entirely positive’.
- Since 16- and 17- year olds can vote for the Scottish Parliament, it is illogical that they cannot vote for the Westminister Parliament.
f) Providing young people with the opportunity to vote earlier will encourage them to take their duties as citizens earlier; especially as these habits can be encouraged while they are still at school.
- It would give young people a say in their futures which will directly impact them, such as University fees, allowing parties to shape their policies around the electorate.
g) The Votes at 16 Coalition was established in 2003 to bring together groups such as NUS and the British Youth Council to campaign for lowering voting age.
- This movement has gathered a huge online presence #VOTE16.
- In 2017 and 2018, a Private Member’s Bill to reduce the voting age to 16 failed in the House of Commons, instead it depends on cross-party support. - No
a) Some of these claims are misleading.
- Parental permission is needed to join the army at 16 or 17, and apart from in Scotland, parental permission is required to marry before 18.
b) Young people are not regarded as responsible enough to buy alcohol or cigarettes themselves until the age of 18, so it is disingenuous to claim that 16- and 17-year-olds are capable of exercising all adult responsibilities.
c) Most 16- and 17- year-olds are still in part- or full-time education.
- They are therefore less likely to pay tax and so do not have the same stake in society as those who are older.
d) Voting turnout among 18- to 24-year-olds is lower than other age groups, so allowing 16- and 17-year-olds to vote could actually compound the problem of youth apathy.
- EXAMPLE. The Isle of Man has enfranchised 16- and 17-year-olds. The turnout in this age group has declined from 55.3% in 2006 to 46.2% in 2016.
e) 16- and 17-year-olds have few adult life experiences on which to base their voting decisions.
- They are thus more likely to be manipulated into voting in a certain way by social media pressure.
f) Although Scotland has reduced the voting age to 16, this does not mean it is the right thing to do.
- Very few countries allow voting at 16, so the UK is within the political mainstream by granting the franchise at 18.
g) The Labour Party under Corbyn has been so closely identifying itself with the youth vote that reducing the voting age to 16 would be an act of political partisanship.
What is the case for Votes for Prisoners?
VOTES FOR PRISONERS
- In the UK, prisoners are not entitled to vote.
a) This is because they are regarded as having renounced the right of citizenship for the duration of the time that they are incarcerated.
b) In 2017, the government offered to allow the small numbers of prisoners on day release the right to vote. - There have been calls for reform.
a) John Hirst brought 2 cases to the British government that prisoners were being denied a fundamental human right.
- This was dismissed by the court in 2001.
- In 2004, the European Court of Human Rights declared that the blanket ban on prisoner voting was contrary to Article 3 of the First Protocol of the European Convention of Human Rights.
b) Pressure groups such as Liberty and the Howard League for Penal Reform support prisoner voting.
- Unlike voting at 16, there has been very little public pressure for a change in this law.
- EXAMPLE. When the issue was debated in the Commons in 2011, it gained cross-party condemnation, with 234 MPs against and only 22 MPs in favour.
What is a pressure group and how are they categorised?
PRESSURE GROUPS
- A group seeking to influence government policy or another authority (business activity) to secure the interests of their members and supporters.
- This could be encouraging them to adopt their ideas or not pursue a policy of which they disapprove.
- Yet the term pressure group is inclusive and can be classified in various ways, such as:
- Sectional/Interests Groups
- Cause/Promotional Groups
- Social Movements
- Insider Groups (relationship with the government)
- Outsider Groups (relationship with the government)