10. Cardiovascular Disease 23 Flashcards
Why might patients on SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy need to replace some of their existing medications?
To minimize risks of hypoglycemia and adverse side effects, and potentially to minimize medication costs.
Which medication should be considered to improve cardiovascular outcomes and reduce the risk of CKD progression in people with type 2 diabetes and CKD with albuminuria treated with maximum tolerated doses of ACE inhibitor or ARB?
Finernone should be considered.
What was the primary outcome observed in patients treated with finerenone?
The primary outcome observed in patients treated with finerenone was a 13% reduction in cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization from heart failure.
What is the name of the trial that showed improvement in CKD outcomes with finerenone?
The FIDELIO-DKD trial showed improvement in CKD STAGE 3-4 outcomes with finerenone.
What type of medication is finerenone?
Finerenone is a selective nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist.
What is the recommendation for using SGLT2 inhibitors in this HF patient population?
SGLT2 inhibitors are recommended to improve symptoms, physical limitations, and quality of life.
What is recommended to reduce the risk of worsening heart failure and cardiovascular death in people with type 2 diabetes and established HFpEF or HFrEF?
An SGLT2 inhibitor with proven benefit in this patient population.
Who are recommended to take an SGLT2 inhibitor?
People with type 2 diabetes and established HFpEF or HFrEF.
What did the EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS, DECLARE-TIMI 58, and CREDENCE trials suggest about the use of SGLT2 inhibitors?
The trials suggested, but did not prove, that SGLT2 inhibitors would be beneficial in the treatment of people with established heart failure.
What were the results of the CREDENCE trial with canagliflozin?
The CREDENCE trial with canagliflozin showed a 39% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure, and a 31% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure.
What reduction in hospitalization for heart failure was observed in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study with the addition of empagliflozin to standard care?
A significant 35% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure was observed.
What type of medication was used in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study to reduce the incidence of heart failure?
SGLT2 inhibitors were used to reduce the incidence of heart failure. كلها بدون استثناء
According to the article, have any of GLP-1 receptor agonists identified an increased risk of heart failure hospitalization?
No, no increased risk of heart failure hospitalization has been identified in the cardiovascular outcomes trials of the GLP-1 receptor agonists liraglutide, semaglutide, exenatide once-weekly, albiglutide, or dulaglutide
Were patients treated with saxagliptin more likely to be hospitalized for heart failure?
Yes, patients treated with saxagliptin were more likely to be hospitalized for heart failure….. other DDP4I. DOSE NOT SHOW ANY RISK….
According to the study, which oral antihyperglycemic agent has better outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes and heart failure?
Metformin users have better outcomes than individuals treated with other antihyperglycemic agents.
Which diabetes medication should be avoided in people with symptomatic heart failure?
Thiazolidinedione
What percentage of people with type 2 diabetes may develop heart failure?
Up to 50% of people with type 2 diabetes may develop heart failure.
What is the study that provides evidence for combination therapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor and a GLP-1 receptor agonist?
The study that provides evidence for combination therapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor and a GLP-1 receptor agonist is AMPLITUDE-O.
What are the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors?
SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalization and progression of kidney disease in people with established ASCVD, multiple risk factors for ASCVD, or albuminuric kidney disease.
Which SGLT2 inhibitors have reported statistically significant reductions in cardiovascular events?
Empagliflozin, Canagliflozin, and Dapagliflozin have reported statistically significant reductions in cardiovascular events….
ertugliflozin» LESSER EFFECT اقل واحد فيهم
Which FDA-approved GLP-1 receptor agonist was removed from the market for business reasons?
Albiglutide was removed from the market for business reasons.
Which GLP-1 receptor agonist showed a lower risk of cardiovascular events in a moderate-sized clinical trial, but was not powered as a cardiovascular outcomes trial?
Semaglutide showed a lower risk of cardiovascular events in a moderate-sized clinical trial, but it was not powered as a cardiovascular outcomes trial.
What was the purpose of the ELIXA trial?
The purpose of the ELIXA trial was to study the cardiovascular outcomes of lixisenatide in people with type 2 diabetes who had a recent acute coronary event…… The ELIXA trial studied the once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide.
What percentage of participants experienced the primary composite outcome in the dulaglutide treatment group? REWIND
12.0% of participants in the dulaglutide treatment group experienced the primary composite outcome.
PLACEPO WAS 13.4%
What was the purpose of the REWIND trial?
The purpose of the REWIND trial was to assess the effect of the once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide versus placebo on major adverse cardiovascular events.
Was oral semaglutide superior to placebo for the primary composite outcome?
No, oral semaglutide was noninferior to placebo for the primary composite outcome.
بمعني انه ينفع
What study assessed the cardiovascular effects of the oral formulation of semaglutide?
The study that assessed the cardiovascular effects of the oral formulation of semaglutide is Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment (PIONEER) 6.
What was the primary outcome measured in the SUSTAIN-6 trial?
The primary outcome measured in the SUSTAIN-6 trial was the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke.
The primary outcome (the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) occurred in 108 patients (6.6%) in the semaglutide group vs. 146 patients (8.9%) in the placebo group
What were the treatment options in the SUSTAIN-6 trial?
The treatment options in the SUSTAIN-6 trial were once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 mg or 1.0 mg) or placebo.
What was the percentage of deaths from cardiovascular causes in the liraglutide group?
4.7% compared with the placebo group (6.0%)
What was the primary composite outcome in the LEADER study?
The primary composite outcome in the LEADER study was a combination of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or cardiovascular death.
What is the mechanism of action of Sotagliflozin?
Sotagliflozin lowers glucose via delayed glucose absorption in the gut and increasing urinary glucose excretion.
What is the name of the trial where Sotagliflozin was evaluated?
Sotagliflozin was evaluated in the Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment Who Are at Cardiovascular Risk (SCORED) trial.
What are the two types of glucose transporters inhibited by Sotagliflozin?
Sotagliflozin inhibits SGLT1 and SGLT2 glucose transporters.
Was ertugliflozin superior to placebo for the key secondary outcome of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure?
No, ertugliflozin was not superior to placebo for the key secondary outcome.
What is the name of the trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ertugliflozin?
The trial is called the Evaluation of Ertugliflozin Efficacy and Safety Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (VERTIS CV).
What were benefits with dapagliflozin therapy compared to placebo? DAPA-CKD?
sustained decline in eGFR of at least 50%, endstage kidney disease, or death from renal causes were significantly lower with dapagliflozin therapy compared to placebo.
Were the effects of dapagliflozin similar in individuals with diabetes and without diabetes?
Yes, the effects of dapagliflozin therapy were similar in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes.
When compared with placebo, did the DECLARE-TIMI 58 study show a lower rate of major adverse cardiovascular events?
No, the study did not show a lower rate of major adverse cardiovascular events when dapagliflozin compared with placebo.
BUT:A lower rate of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure was noted
What outcome did canagliflozin significantly reduce in the combined analysis of the two trials? CANVAS & CANVAS-RENAL + CREDENCE
Canagliflozin significantly reduced the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke.
What were the outcomes observed in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial?
The trial showed a 14% reduction in the composite outcome of MI, stroke, and cardiovascular death.
Have DPP-4 inhibitors shown cardiovascular benefits relative to placebo?
No, DPP-4 inhibitors have not shown cardiovascular benefits relative to placebo.
According to the content, why is indiscriminate screening not considered cost-effective? In screening CVD?
Indiscriminate screening is not considered cost-effective because it may lead to unnecessary tests and treatments for individuals who are not at high risk of cardiovascular disease.
Is routine screening of asymptomatic people with type 2 diabetes and normal ECGs clinically beneficial?
No, there is no clinical benefit to routine screening of asymptomatic people with type 2 diabetes and normal ECGs.
What are the two recommended methods for stress testing in individuals unable to exercise?
The two recommended methods for stress testing in individuals unable to exercise are pharmacologic stress echocardiography and nuclear imaging.
What type of stress testing should be considered in individuals with diabetes who have resting ECG abnormalities?
Pharmacologic stress echocardiography or nuclear imaging should be considered.
What is the purpose of pharmacologic stress echocardiography or nuclear imaging in individuals with diabetes and resting ECG abnormalities?
To assess cardiovascular function and risk in individuals who cannot undergo exercise stress testing due to ECG abnormalities.
For which age group is measuring coronary artery calcium reasonable for cardiovascular risk assessment?
adults with diabetes ≥40 years of age
Who are the candidates for advanced or invasive cardiac testing?
The candidates for advanced or invasive cardiac testing are those with typical or atypical cardiac symptoms and an abnormal resting electrocardiogram (ECG).
What initial tests can be used for candidates for cardiac testing?
Exercise ECG testing without or with echocardiography may be used as the initial test.
In people with type 2 diabetes and stable heart failure, can metformin be continued for glucose lowering?
Yes, metformin may be continued for glucose lowering if estimated glomerular filtration rate remains >30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Should metformin be avoided in unstable or hospitalized individuals with heart failure?
Yes, metformin should be avoided in unstable or hospitalized individuals with heart failure.
What type of medication should be included in the treatment of individuals with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
A β-blocker with proven cardiovascular outcomes benefit.
When should a β-blocker be included in the treatment of individuals with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
A β-blocker should be included unless otherwise contraindicated.
How long should β-blockers be continued after a prior myocardial infarction?
β-blockers should be continued for 3 years after the event.
What therapy is recommended to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in people with known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, particularly coronary artery disease?
ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy.
In which population is ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy recommended to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events?
People with known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, particularly coronary artery disease.
What is the recommended addition for people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease with albuminuria treated with maximum tolerated doses of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker?
The recommended addition is finerenone.
What are the benefits of adding finerenone for people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease with albuminuria?
The benefits of adding finerenone include improving cardiovascular outcomes and reducing the risk of chronic kidney disease progression.
In people with type 2 diabetes and established heart failure, which medication is recommended to improve symptoms, physical limitations, and quality of life?
A sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor with proven benefit in this patient population.
Which patient population is recommended to use a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in people with type 2 diabetes and established heart failure?
Patients with either preserved or reduced ejection fraction.
Which patient population is recommended to use a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor?
People with type 2 diabetes and established heart failure with either preserved or reduced ejection fraction
What type of therapy may be considered for additive reduction in the risk of adverse cardiovascular and kidney events in people with type 2 diabetes?
Combined therapy with a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist.
Which group of individuals may consider combined therapy with a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist for cardiovascular risk reduction?
People with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
What is the purpose of combined therapy with a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors?
To achieve additive reduction in the risk of adverse cardiovascular and kidney events.
What is recommended to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
A glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist with demonstrated cardiovascular benefit.
Who are the individuals that should consider taking a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events?
People with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
According to the article, what is recommended to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and/or heart failure hospitalization in people with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
A sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor with demonstrated cardiovascular benefit is recommended.
Who might benefit from the recommended treatment for reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and/or heart failure hospitalization?
People with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, multiple atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factors, or diabetic kidney disease.
According to the article, what type of medication is recommended for people with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or established kidney disease?
A sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist with demonstrated cardiovascular disease benefit.
When should investigations for coronary artery disease be considered?
Investigations for coronary artery disease should be considered in the presence of atypical cardiac symptoms, signs or symptoms of associated vascular disease, or electrocardiogram abnormalities.
What are examples of atypical cardiac symptoms that warrant investigations for coronary artery disease?
Examples of atypical cardiac symptoms include unexplained dyspnea and chest discomfort.
Why is routine screening for coronary artery disease not recommended in asymptomatic individuals?
Routine screening for coronary artery disease is not recommended in asymptomatic individuals because it does not improve outcomes as long as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factors are treated.
What should be done instead of routine screening for coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals?
Instead of routine screening for coronary artery disease, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factors should be treated.
What was the superior treatment for individuals with established coronary artery disease and/or peripheral artery disease?
Aspirin plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily was superior to aspirin plus placebo.
What is the potential benefit of early aspirin discontinuation compared to continued dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting?
Early aspirin discontinuation may reduce the risk of bleeding without increasing the risks of mortality and ischemic events…. TWILIGHT trial
What was noted with dual antiplatelet therapy?
A higher incidence of major bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage, was noted.
What is the effect of adding ticagrelor to aspirin in terms of reducing the risk of recurrent ischemic events?
Adding ticagrelor to aspirin significantly reduces the risk of recurrent ischemic events including cardiovascular and CHD death.
What are the potential benefits of using a P2Y12 receptor antagonist in combination with aspirin beyond 1 year in patients following an ACS?
Using a P2Y12 receptor antagonist in combination with aspirin may have benefits beyond 1 year in patients following an ACS…
ticagrelor or clopidogrel
According to the study, what were the findings regarding the differences in cardiovascular events or major bleeding between patients assigned to 81 mg and those assigned to 325 mg of aspirin daily?
There were no significant differences in cardiovascular events or major bleeding between patients assigned to 81 mg and those assigned to 325 mg of aspirin daily.
It appears that 75–162 mg/day is optimal.
What is the primary reason why aspirin use is generally contraindicated in patients aged <21 years?
The primary reason for the contraindication of aspirin use in patients aged <21 years is the associated risk of Reye syndrome.
Who is aspirin not recommended for?
Aspirin is not recommended for those at low risk of ASCVD (such as men and women aged <50 years with diabetes with no other major ASCVD risk factors).
What is ASCVD?
ASCVD stands for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.
What is the recommended use of aspirin for secondary prevention in people with documented ASCVD?
For people with documented ASCVD, the use of aspirin for secondary prevention has far greater benefit than risk, therefore, aspirin is still recommended.
What does ASCVD stand for?
ASCVD stands for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
In what context may aspirin be considered?
Aspirin may be considered in the context of high cardiovascular risk with low bleeding risk, but generally not in older adults.
Should the use of aspirin be recommended for primary prevention?
No, the use of aspirin may generally not be recommended for primary prevention.
Which age group is recommended to use aspirin as primary prevention?
Men and women aged ≥50 years with diabetes and at least one additional major risk factor.
Family history of premature ASCVD, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, or CKD/albuminuria.
who are not at increased risk of bleeding (e.g., older age, anemia, renal disease)
For adults with ASCVD risk greater than what percentage per year, will the number of ASCVD events prevented be similar to the number of induced bleeding episodes?
For adults with ASCVD risk greater than 1% per year, the number of ASCVD events prevented will be similar to the number of induced bleeding episodes.
بمعني فوق ١ في المية خطوره فايدة الاسبرين اعلي من المضاعفات
What were the two large randomized trials of aspirin for primary prevention mentioned in the article?
The two large randomized trials of aspirin for primary prevention mentioned in the article were ARRIVE and ASPREE IN ELDERLY.
By what percentage did aspirin reduce the risk of serious vascular events? ASCEND TRIAL
12%
IS ASA BENEFICIAL FOR 1RY PREVENTION FOR CVD?
no previous cardiovascular events, its net benefit is more controversial
In which patients is aspirin shown to be effective in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality?
Aspirin is shown to be effective in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients with previous MI or stroke (secondary prevention).
What is the recommended use of aspirin in high-risk patients with previous MI or stroke?
Aspirin is strongly recommended in high-risk patients with previous MI or stroke for reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
What is the recommended dosage for aspirin therapy as a primary prevention strategy for those with diabetes?
The recommended dosage for aspirin therapy as a primary prevention strategy for those with diabetes is 75-162 mg/day.
When can aspirin therapy be considered as a primary prevention strategy for those with diabetes?
Aspirin therapy can be considered as a primary prevention strategy for those with diabetes who are at increased cardiovascular risk, after a comprehensive discussion with the patient on the benefits versus the comparable increased risk of bleeding.
For whom should combination therapy with aspirin plus low-dose rivaroxaban be considered?
Combination therapy with aspirin plus low-dose rivaroxaban should be considered for individuals with stable coronary and/or peripheral artery disease and low bleeding risk.
What is the goal of combination therapy with aspirin plus low-dose rivaroxaban?
The goal of combination therapy with aspirin plus low-dose rivaroxaban is to prevent major adverse limb and cardiovascular events.
Which individuals should consider long-term treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy?
Individuals with prior coronary intervention, high ischemic risk, and low bleeding risk should consider long-term treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy.
What is the purpose of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy?
The purpose of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy is to prevent major adverse cardiovascular events for individuals with prior coronary intervention, high ischemic risk, and low bleeding risk.
How long is it reasonable to continue dual antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome?
It is reasonable to continue dual antiplatelet therapy for a year after an acute coronary syndrome.
What is the recommended dual antiplatelet therapy for a year after an acute coronary syndrome?
The recommended dual antiplatelet therapy includes low-dose aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor.