1) Coalitional Game Theory Flashcards

1
Q

The Shapley Value: Axioms and Properties

A

Efficient
Fair way of dividing the grand coalitions payment

Members receive payoff proportional to their marginal contributions

> Interchangeability
Symmetry
Dummy Player
Additivity

Example: Voting Game

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The Shapley Value function

A

Ways the Set S / Coalition could have formed prior to player I addition (S!)

Ways the remaining players could be added
Summing over all possible combinations of coalitions that are there before I
Average dividing by 1/N!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Core: Propoerties

A

Analogous to Nash Equilibrium (no profitable deviations) but for GROUPS of agents

> A set, assigning a unique payoff distribution

> efficient
< individual rational
coalitional rational

Example: Voting Game with 80% majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

simple game

A

for all coalitions, the value is either 0 or 1

In a simple game, the core is empty if there is no veto player,
if there is one, the core consists of all payoff vectors in which non veto players get 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Convex Game

A

Stronger assumptions than superadditivity

Accounts for overlap

The value of the union of two sets is at least as big as their values alone minus their intersection

Here, The Shapley Value is in the core

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The Nucleolus

A

Assigns a unique payoff distribution
The payoffs assigned are within the core

always unique

MAking the largest dissatisfaction as small as possible
(Excesses)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Imputations

A

The payoff distributions for N that are
Efficient and
individually rational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Excess

A

a measure of dissatisfaction f the coalition Se with the Imputation x

> The difference between what S can contain on its own and what it receives from x

If excesses is positive contains less than its own worth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Nucleolus procedure

A

1: Find the imutations for which maximal excess among all coalitions as small as possible
- -> if there is a unique one, it’s the core baby

2: If not: Determine the coalitions for which maximal excess can not be increased further.
3. Continue with remaining coalitions and find the iputations for which excess among remaining coalitions as small as possible –> if unique imputation –> the Nucleolus if unique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nash Bargaining Solution

A

Unqiue solution to a two player bargaining problem,
satisfying the axioms:

Assigning a feasible point to every bargaining problem

1) Invariance of Scale
2) Pareto optimality
3) Independence of irrelevant alternatives
4) Symmetry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

BArgaining Problem

A

is a pair (S, d)) with the deasible set, S and the disagreement point, d.

> Convex
closed and bounded

Game ends in d if they do not reach an agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Symmetry

A
Allocates equal (symmetric) payments 
to symmetric players
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Scale Covariance

A

in a bargaining problem,

two utilties that are linear transformation should represent or results in the same preferences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Independence of irrelevant alternatives

A

If a is preffered option in S and T is a subset of S then the preference should still hold in T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly