06- speech sound development norms Flashcards

1
Q

word initial

A

VOT and formant transitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

word final

A

stop gap & voicebar & formant transitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

/r/ primary acoustic cue

A

low F3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cross-sectional large-scale normative studies

A

track different kids at each age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

age of acquisition

A

not the same from study to study
does not reference when a child first starts to use a sound
age at which some fixed % of children in the sample used the sound correctly, with the sound’s position in the word typically taken into account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what kind of study is sander 1972

A

cross sectional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

methods of sander 1972

A

reinterpreted data from templin and wellman et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

sander left edge of the bar

A

age at which 50% of kids from templin and wellman produced the sound correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

right edge of bar sander

A

age at which 90% of kids from templin and wellman produced the sound correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

which word positions were tracked in Sander (1972)

A

2/3 in customary production
2/3 in mastery production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Smit and Colleagues (1990) population and type of study

A

cross sectional; 500 children in Iowa and 465 children in Nebraska

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Smit and Colleagues (1990) purpose

A

reported what % of children in an age group were able to produce each sound correctly; initial and final reported separate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Smit an Colleagues (1990) findings

A

differences between male and female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is a longitudinal study

A

one set of kids followed over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stoel-gammon (1985) methods and type

A

34 children; longitudinal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

primary interest of Stoel-Gammon

A

if children use the sound at all consistently but not looking for using them correctly

17
Q

reported in stoel-gammon

A

at least 50% of children use the sounds in 2+ different words
differences tracked between emerging initial and final consonants

18
Q

what is a relative study

A

depends on adult expectations in how to count data

19
Q

what is an independent analysis

A

does not depend on any adult expectations

20
Q

generalizations from stoel-gammon

A
  1. word-initial and word-final are different in acquisition
  2. voiced consonants emerge first- stops tend to emerge first
  3. in word-final, the voiceless stops occur first
  4. as kids get older, more sounds are acquired
21
Q

Robb & Bleile (1994) type and criteria

A

longitudinal study; @ least 605 of children in 2+ different words
all transcribiable productions were counted including babbling

22
Q

Robb & Bleile (1994) results

A

data suggests that kids want to start using sounds before their 1st words

23
Q

Paul and Jennings (1992) results

A

syllables indicate sounds produced which results in syllable structure levels

24
Q

Paul and Jennings (1992) level 1

A

CV syllables: C voiced syllabic, V voiced

25
Q

Paul and Jennings (1992) level 2

A

CVC or VC (or CV not in level 1)

26
Q

Paul and Jennings (1992) level 3

A

syllables with 2+ different consonant types with no regard to voicing differences

27
Q

clinical implications of Paul and Jennings (1992)

A

20-50 child vocalization are needed to identify a child’s level of syllable production

28
Q

at what age should my client be producing their sound? instead ask

A

when could the child start to want to use the sound even in babbling?

29
Q

Lof (2004) takeaways

A

normative data on consonant development should not be used for assessment or to diagnose
Smit (1993): irregular errors are more likely to affect the overall intelligibility and more indicative of a disorder

30
Q

what should be used to diagnose

A

norm-referenced assessments on all sounds (GFTA-3 and Con Lewis)

31
Q

shriberg (1993)

A

developmental sound classes

32
Q

developmental shriberg class early

A

m, b, j, n, w, d, p, h

33
Q

developmental shriberg class middle

A

t, ŋ, k, g, f, v, tʃ, dʒ

34
Q

developmental shriberg class late

A

ʃ, θ, ð, s, z, l, r, ʒ