04 Health and Safety Management Systems 3 - Planning Flashcards
What is meant by SMART objectives?
SMART stands as an acronyms of:
Specific.- A clearly, defined, precise objective
Measurable.- Possible to measure that the target has been achieved.
Achievable.- It can be done
Reasonable.- Within the timescale set and with the resources allocated. Actions which the organization can actually take.
Time-bound. A deadline or timescale is set for completion of the objective. A completion date for each action.
Why is the distinction between hazards and risks so important to health and safety management?
Hazards will always exist in the workplace and usually it is not possible to eliminate them.
Risk can be controlled and reduced. This is the central point of Health and Safety Management.
State the purpose and objectives of risk assessment.
The aim of risk assessment is to eliminate hazards to reduce risk to an acceptable level. The objectives are to prevent personal injury and ill-health, to achieve legal compliance, and to reduce costs associated with losses.
What do accident triangles show?
Accident triangles show the relationship between numbers of accidents with different outcomes. They show the ratio of number of events with no significant outcome to events with minor outcome to events with very serious outcome. Overall there will be a much larger number of near misses / incidents compared to the number of minor injury events, in turn compared to the numbers of serious injury events.
What techniques are used for identifying hazards?
- • Inspections A formal inspection can reveal the various hazards that are present and that need to be considered in the risk assessment. One problem with this method is that it is being carried out in an existing workplace and so any identified hazards already exist. This is contrary to the general principle of safety management, which is that the hazard should not be introduced until after the risk assessment has been carried out and the controls put in place.
- Task Analysis This is a useful method for identifying hazards, since it allows hazards to be spotted before work starts, rather than after the work has started. Task analysis involves breaking a job down into component steps and identifying the hazards associated with each step, so that the safe working method can then be established to deal with each hazard. This can be done before work starts as part of the planning process, and is how Safe Systems of Work (SSWs) are developed.
- Legislation Knowledge of the legal standards that apply to a particular workplace is an important aid to identifying any significant hazards that need to be identified. For example, knowledge of the law relating to work at height will allow a competent assessor to identify which tasks might be defined as work at height and which can be ignored. Legislation is often accompanied by guidance documents which can be very useful in the identification of hazards. For example, in the UK guidance documents exist to spell out all the hazards that exist in engineering workshops.
- Manufacturers’ Information When a new item of plant, machinery or equipment is purchased it usually comes with an instruction book that contains information about all the related hazards and instructions for safe use, cleaning and maintenance. Similarly, when a new substance is purchased it comes with labels and a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) that clearly identifies the hazards of the substance.
- Incident Data Internal accident and near miss data can be useful in identifying hazards. The main limitation here is that a hazard may be very significant but may not yet have caused harm in the organisation and may therefore go unnoticed. External data, such as national statistics published by the authorities, can be more useful since they identify the real hazards and risks based on a much larger population size.
Apart from operators, what particular staff groups require special consideration during risk assessment?
- Cleaners
- Maintenance Operators
- Young workers
- Lone Workers
- New and expectant mothers
- Disable staff
- Contractors
- Members of the public
What are the advantages of adopting a semi-quantitative risk rating system? (4)
Using a semi-quantitative risk rating system can be useful for several reasons:
- Clarity of thinking - people tend to think more carefully about likelihood and severity of foreseeable injury when they are asked to use this type of scoring system, and so give a more accurate end result.
- Consistency of approach - different people can use this system and will get similar results.
- Prioritisation - since risk is now represented by a number, and the higher the number the greater the risk, it is possible to easily separate out the various risks presented by several hazards and rank them in order.
- Timescale - it is even possible to allocate particular timescales to the risk ratings that are calculated using this type of system.
This approach is not universal, but is used by some organisations. If there are clear legal standards about the controls that should be applied to a particular hazard in a workplace, then the use of a scoring system and risk prioritisation and timescales, etc. becomes largely redundant. The only question that really matters is: Are we doing what the law requires? Yes or no?
What factors are used to evaluate risk?
Likelihood of the harm and Severity at that harm
What is residual Risk
Is the remaining risk after adopting the risk controls. It should be only low-level, acceptable risk
- If the residual risk is low then it might be considered acceptable - the existing controls are adequate. Nothing more need be done. In effect the risk assessment has confirmed that the current situation is acceptable.
- If the residual risk is high, a decision has to be made about whether this residual risk is tolerable or unacceptable:
- Tolerable implies that it is not acceptable but it can be tolerated for a short time while interim controls are put into place.
- Unacceptable implies that the risk level is too high for work to be allowed.
What are the Principles of Prevention
Eliminate the Hazard
Substitute the Hazard
Create a a Safe Place – Engineering solutions
Create a Safe person – Administrative procedures, PPE.
What conditions might trigger a risk assessment review?
There are a number of situations that might trigger a review of a risk assessment:
- Significant change to something that the risk assessment relates to:
- Process.
- Substances.
- Equipment.
- Workplace environment.
- Personnel.
- Legal standards.
- There is reason to suspect that the assessment is not valid:
- Accident.
- Near miss.
- Ill-health.
It is also good practice to review risk assessments on a regular basis. This is often done by determining a frequency of review based on the level of risk associated with the activity in question. An annual review of risk assessments is common practice in many workplaces.
Priorities and Timescales addressing actions after a risk assessment
Normally we will use prioritization: the higher the risk the higher the priority. But there are two problems with this:
- A low risk level might be low priority, but it might also have a very simple, quick, low cost remedy. A law court might not accept that something that is quick and easy to address should be allowed to persist; it should be addressed immediately because it can be done immediately.
- A medium risk might demand a medium priority, but that does not necessarily mean that a law court would accept that an intermediate timescale would be acceptable. The level of risk to workers should always be acceptable - not just acceptable after 24 hours of working.
Why a young person might be more vulnerable to risk, and what should be done to minimize risk?
- Lack of experience in workplaces in general.
- Physical and, perhaps, mental immaturity.
- Poor perception of risk.
- Heavily influenced by peer group pressure.
- Eager to show a willingness to work.
- Less developed communication skills.
It may be necessary to:
- Carry out risk assessments specifically with young persons in mind.
- Prohibit a young person from carrying out certain high risk activities (e.g. operating high-risk machinery).
- Restrict their work patterns and hours (no night shift work or overtime).
- Train and supervise them more than other workers.
- Provide mentors to monitor and supervise young persons more closely than other workers and to provide clear lines of communication.
- Provide specific health surveillance.
How we should consider the case of expectant women and nursing mothers when doing risk assessments?
In most of these instances the hazard presents a risk not only to the woman but also to the baby. Many of these hazards can cause miscarriage, birth defects or ill-health in the baby. In all cases where a woman reports that she is pregnant, a risk assessment should be carried out focusing on the work that she is doing and the hazards that might increase risk to her and the child. It may then be necessary to:
- Change the type of work or the way that it is done.
- Change the hours of work.
- Suspend the woman from the workplace.
How we should consider the case of disabled workers when doing risk assessments?
During the risk assessment process it may be necessary to:
- Identify certain health and fitness criteria for some jobs and then evaluate staff against these criteria. This may result in those with a certain disability being excluded from doing these jobs, e.g. forklift truck drivers should have their eyesight checked before being allowed to drive.
- Identify workers with known disabilities and consider what the implications of their particular type and level of disability might be.
Why lone workers are a group of workers who are especially vulnerable in certain instances?
- They may be more at risk of violence, particularly if the worker is exposed to members of the public, has to travel out into the community, or is involved in work that brings them into contact with violent people, e.g. in prisons or mental-health institutions.
- They may be more at risk if they are injured or fall ill. Certain types of work involve a high risk of personal injury or ill health (e.g. confined space entry). In these situations lone working may be inappropriate or additional precautions may be necessary to protect the individual.