04 CAE Crash simulation theory Flashcards
implicit vs. explicit time
implicit: response of future time n+1 depends on current and future status (hard)
explicit: response of future time n+1 depends only on current and previous state (easier)
Explicit time integration (explicit FEM) is good for dynamic problems with short duration, highly non-linear material behavior and complicated contacts
stability criterion (explicit)
delata t <=2/w w=sqrd(k/m)
to long time steps
original graph can’t be traced
following graph diverts into extremes
finite Elements
- structure is divided into finite number of elements
-> nodes, elements, stiffness as connection of nodes
critical time step
delta t = Icsqrd(p(1-v^2)/E)
Ic = size of element
E = stiffness of material
p = density of material
most important parts
Elements, Material modules, contacts
different elements
beam o—o, shall elements, “bulky” solid elements
Element count in regards to approximation
the more elements the better the approximation
Smaller elements drawbacks
smaller elements result in smaller time steps
material model
x: strain
Y: stress
Graph: first steep increase, that plateau and decrease
First elastic than plastic deformation
generally explicit FE codes can manage highly non-linear material models, which is very difficult in implicit FE codes
Contacts
points can be connected or not
non-linear by nature
LS-Dyna uses simplification
major explicit FE codes
Ls-Dyna
Radioss
Pamcrash
Abaques Explicit