02_hazardous_substances_and_other_chemicals_assessment_of_risk_20140117153011 Flashcards
In order to achieve the above it is necessary to consider a range of factors in each CoSHH risk assessment. 12
- The hazardous properties of a substance2. ExposureD. durationA. activitiesF. frequencyT. thresholdsT. typeL. levelN. no. of people3. Route of entry 4. Particle size of solids 5. Volatility of liquids 6. Concentration7. Solubility8. The nature of the task 9. Mixtures of chemicals10. Effectiveness of existing control measures 11. Results from health surveillance and monitoring 12. Individual susceptibilities
LD 50 :
the ingested dose which kills 50% of the test population, measured in milligrams/micrograms per kilogram of body weight.
LC 50 :
airborne concentration of a toxic substance lethal to 50% of the test population, measured in millilitres per kilogram of body weight.
The nature of the task will also affect exposure to hazardous substances. Employees may be exposed: 5
Directly i.e. by doing the task Indirectly i.e. by passive exposure to the hazardous substance in the work area Undertaking cleaning or maintenance tasks By contact with contaminated work areas, clothing etc. Accidental release of a hazardous substance.
Mixtures of chemicals 4
Additive effects: The combined effect equals the sum of the effects of each chemical alone, i.e. 1 + 1 = 2 Synergistic effects: The combined effect is larger than the sum of the effects of each chemical alone, i.e. 1 + 1 = 40. Antagonistic effects: The combined effect is less than the sum of the effects of each chemical alone, i.e. 1 + 1 = 0. Potentiating effects: A chemical that normally has no effect will increase the effect that another chemical would have alone, i.e. 0 + 1 = 3
Individual susceptibilities Employers are required to protect particular groups of employees who may be at an increased risk, for example: 7
Inexperienced trainees and young people aged under 18 Pregnant workers Disabled workers Any employees known to be susceptible to certain illnesses such as dermatitis Any employee suffering atopic (allergic) asthma due to pollen, or eczema due to dust mites etc. may consequently be at more risk of sensitisation to a work exposure to a sensitising agent Any employee known to be previously sensitised to a work based skin or asthma sensitising agent Any employee with pre-existing medical conditions, which could be made worse by exposure to chemicals.
The principles of good COSHH practice are: 8
1) Design and operate processes and activities to minimise emission, release and spread of substances hazardous to health. 2) Take into account all relevant routes of exposure. 3) Ensure control measures are proportionate to the health risk. 4) Choose the most effective and reliable control options to minimise the escape and spread of hazardous substances. 5) Where adequate control cannot be achieved by other means, provide, in combination with other control measures, suitable personal protective equipment (PPE). 6) Check and regularly review control measures to ensure their continuing effectiveness. 7) Inform and train all employees on the hazards and risks and the control measures developed to minimise the risks. 8) Ensure that the introduction of control measures does not increase the overall risk to health and safety.
Sources of exposure should be reduced by: 3
number, size, emission or release rate
PPE tends to be less effective and reliable than other control options, because it: 7
Has to be selected for the individual Has to fit the individual and not interfere with their work or other PPE worn at the same time Has to be put on correctly every time it is worn Has to remain properly fitted all the time the individual is exposed Has to be properly stored, checked and maintained Tends to be delicate and relatively easily damaged Fails to danger, sometimes without warning.
‘Software’ controls:
defined methods of working, supervisory actions, record keeping etc.
‘Hardware’ controls:
example: local exhaust ventilation (LEV).
The hierarchy concentrates on ‘control of source’ (collective measures) as the most effective and reliable and ‘individual measures’ (those relying on people to do/wear etc.) as the least effective and efficient: 6
Eliminate the hazard, or substitute for a less harmful substance Change the form of the substance Modify the process to emit less of the hazardous substance Engineering controls, for example: local exhaust ventilation (LEV) Minimise the number of workers exposed Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).
The use or production of hazardous substances may be eliminated by: 3
Changing the method of work eliminate the task so that exposure is no longer necessary Modifying a process to eliminate the production of a hazardous by-product or waste product Substituting wherever reasonably practicable, a hazardous substance for a non-hazardous substance, for example: water based pint instead of oil based paint.
Carcinogenic Category 1
Substances known to cause cancer on the basis of human experience
Carcinogenic Category 2
Substances which it is assumed can cause cancer on the basis of reliable animal evidence
Carcinogenic Category 3
Substances where there is only evidence in animals which is of doubtful relevance to human health (i.e. the evidence is not good enough for Category 1 or 2)
An employer could use the following information sources when investigating whether carcinogens or mutagens are used in the workplace: 11
Chemical labels Safety data sheets (SDS’s) for substances used in the workplace, particularly relevant risk phrases Annex VI of the CLP Regulation for classification as carcinogen The European Chemicals Agency candidates list or list for substances of very high concern (SVHC) Schedule 1 of CoSHH By the application of the criteria in CHIP in a self-classifying approach for new substances EH40 Workplace Exposure Limits Scientific papers Information from trade associations The Chemical Industry Association The International Labour Organization.