Written Submissions and Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Whats included in the notice of arbitratiin

A

Names/addresses/telephone numbers of both parties
Isseu to be resolved
Prospective resolution
Arbitration specifications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Whats included in the statements of case

A

Whether submissions will be sequential/simultaneous
Memorials or pleadings
When evidence will be oresented
When documents will be exchanged
How many rounds of pleadings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Should evidence be produced in the statement of claim

A

no
evidence at this stage is too fictitious cuz the tribunal has no idea whats going on, and giving evidence on a matter thats unknown doesn tmake sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When should evidence be bought in

A

After the first round of pleadings,ie after response to counter claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When should experts be bought in

A

It depends, some experts will be needed from the onset if their testimony is needed for the foundations of the claim
Example: Material from bridge is faulty

Some experts are only needed at the very end in regards to the quantu of damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Article 3 of IBA rules

A

PArties must submit to the tribunal all documents in which they should rely on
A party may ask other party for production of documents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Requirements for requesting other party for the production of documents under IBA article 3

A

Documents must be material and relevant to the outcome
Documents must be in the possession of the other party
Documents must not be in possession of the party requesting
Production of documents must not be unduly burdensome
Party must produce precide statement of documents it needs
Must believe that they reasonably eist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Procedure of written pleadings

A

Usually sequentially and not simultaneous cuz may reuslt in a situation where its like 2 ships passing in the night
Move for te production of electronic documents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Time and length limits

A

No time limiit, normlaly takes like 3 months between submissions
Some institutions are now considering putting word counts/page limits on submissions cuz the lengthier they are, the longer it takes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Collecting evidence

A

Not really feasibe to look at statistics due to confidential nature of arbitration
Fact finding rahter than law applying is central to arbitration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Civil law v Common law

A

CV- judges take a more proactive approach
CL- Not really

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Admissibility of written pleadings

A

Normally will be accepted as admissible, arbitrators told not to use rules on evidence from their own jurisdiciton
Pragmatic approach applied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Burden of proof
State rule

A

Burden of proof rests on the person making the allegation

UNCITRAL 27(1)- Burden lies on person making claim/defence, some will require evidence or testimony but some are so obvious that they dont need to be bake dup by proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the standard of proof

A

Usually the balance of probabilities, ie more likely than not.
The more outrageous the claim, the higher the burden of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the categories of evidence

A

Documents- most important
`witness testimony
Expert ebidence
Inspection of subject matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Documentary evidence

A

Parties produce documents that they will relu on and usually provide them with their written submissions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Article 3 IBA

A

Provide tribunal with documents that they will rely on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Redfern schedule

A

In regards to documentary production
Helps crysralise the issues between the parties as to what documents needed and so the tribunal know each parties position

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What will tribunal do if not satisfied with the redfrn shcedule

A

Request additional info
Order a case management conference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the prague rules?

A

Give a civil law tatse to arb
Provide that parties cant request fo document production unless theyve made it clear from the onset that it would be needed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The production of electronic documens

A

Newer documents rather than old documents are given more weight

Common LAw- all relevant documents have to be produced

Civil law- only the documents that the parties will rely on

21
Q

How does IBA define a document

A

A wrtining, communication, pricure whether recorded, or paper, or electronic

Doesnt differentiate between a hard copy or a soft copy

22
Q

Documents in possession of thrid parties

A

The tribunal has no authority to issue subpeonas to theird parties, may request assistance from the court.

23
Q

Adverse inferences

A

Tribunal will drw adverse inferences from a party that fails to produce evidence with an order from tribunal

IBA 9.6 and 9.7

24
Q

2 limitations where IBA rules aply

A

When tribunal has made an order for the production of the document
When the party has failed to give a satisfactory explanation for not submitting

25
Q

Presentation of documents

A

Usually in chronological order
Hyperlinked
If authenticity is at dispute, tribunal will request the original
If in anothe rlanguage, tribunal will reuest that it be translated

26
Q

Fact witness evidence
Role

A

To explain and supplement the evidentiary documents to help the tribunal conduct their fact finding

Less weight given than documsnts due to memor and sometimes cuz they have direct/indirect interest in outcome

27
Q

Article 4 of IBA rules

A
  1. disclose of witness
  2. Can be anyone, even the party
  3. Can be prepared by lawyer
  4. Tribunal can request that this be done within a certain period of time
  5. Testimony include name facs etc
  6. CAn be excluded if fail to apppear
28
Q

Presentation of witness evidence
Name rule

A

Parties can say which witness needs oral testimony, but tibunal can decide even if parties agree to not have oral that the witness be oally examined

Article 5.2 of the prague rules provides for this too

29
Q

Prparation of witnesses

A

IBA and LCIA allow for this
however, it would be misconduct if lawyer were to make witness give testimony of something that they both knwo to be incorrect

30
Q

PArties as witnesses

A

Yes unless the parties agree to not
Tribunal will hold less weight because of their direct interest in the outcome

31
Q

Admisisbility and weight of witness evidence
State provision

A

Generally, it won’t be inadmissible, just less weight will be given to it.
Article 27(4) UNCITRAL
Tribunal has discretion to determine evidentiary weight of testimony

32
Q

Evidence outside of seat

A

Tribunal doesnt have the power to subpeoona thrd parties
However hague convention, although not bidning for tribunls, sinatories gernall assist
But the fact that negative inferences are drawn also helps

33
Q

Expert evidence

A

When tribunal lacks the necessary expertise they can:
1. Issue their own expert
2. request that parties bring their own

34
Q

Issue their own expert

A

Parties are asked to agree on candidate
If cant list is made
If cant, tribunal decides

35
Q

request that parties bring their own

A

More difficult for the tribunal because 2 onflicting experts

36
Q

Hearings

A

In the majority of arbitraton, hearings occur

However, some have no hearing and tribunal still administer award, very rare

37
Q

Organisation of hearings

A

By tribunal but can also be done by the insitution

Most timely and cost intensive part of the arbitral process

38
Q

Location

A

Wherever the party deems best
MAin evidentiary hearing usually at the place of arbitraton

39
Q

Remote hearings

A

Prior to covid, only for urgent matters

Now more often recognisd

Recognised inequality of arms, if one online, other should go online too

40
Q

Pre hearing conference

A

Rationale: Saves time and money spent on actula hearing itself

Too late: Doesnt shape hearing

Too early: Tribunal uninformed and wont know what to discuss

41
Q

Things covered at pre hearing conference

A

Running order
Allocation of time
Lenght of opening statements
Scope and lenght of witnwss cross examination

42
Q

Things covered at pre hearing conference remote

A

Dress code
cyber security
Platform
Service providers

43
Q

Aim of hearings

A

to cover everything in the shortest amount of time possile for wxpense an dschedule o arbitrators

44
Q

Opening statemet

A

Short cuz tibunal already well informed on issues

45
Q

Examination of witnesses

A

Shouldnt be told to be disingenious, misconduct under IBA

46
Q

Wtiness conferencing

A

Usually for experts to facilitate discussion and allow for the tribunal to ask neessary questions

47
Q

Closin submisisons

A

Usually written

48
Q

Who has the last word

A

usually repsondent cux claimant started

49
Q

Deafault hearings

A

If party fails to participate, eharings can rpoceed ex parte and award sitll issued, award has to mention failute to participate so that it doesnt get challenged

50
Q

How to not participate

A

Boycott
Cause undue delay
Amke it impossible for things to proceed

51
Q

Procedure

A

Must keep party full informed
doesnt have to advocate for party
Can produce award